Yes! correct on the incentive point 9:24 if people got a fine for quitting they'd stop doing it as much, fact is there's a reward for destroying marriages, mainly women doing it.
Women's emotions fluctuate & some women see dysfunction as an evolutionary advantage but you have to keep in mind that the culture doesn't raise women to see monogamy as stability but a limitation, a ceiling instead of a threshold to a new venue of living.
They're raised with an "autonomy" / I, Me, Myself, Me, Autonomy, Me,: mindset.
That Former Mrs.Ball left likely because she felt bored, complacent, in his shadow probably & leaving was her gaining "agency" or some crap. Perhaps she didn't feel like she had enough part to play in the childrens outcome, perhaps he was a control freak about it.
Otherwise: "agency" is the usual cult dogma that's been drilled into their minds. We don't know her reasons, we're not in her head, but as a general rule this is the fetish dogma western women are brainwashed to obey like slaves, it's the modern rigid norm, but no one's supposed to challenge that norm even though it's hurting women's longterm interests.
Women were told to trade patriarchy for egalitarian socio-political gain & career enslavement; they traded nuclear unit norms for the norms that burn them out, leaves them isolated & lonely because most men will sleep with them but don't take them seriously or respect them because of toxic internet culture that just drives the two further apart either through the media disrespecting men, more gaslights & enabling female resentment of men. Or malecentric echo chambers feeding male resentment of women. People talking past each other, fetishes, distractions etc.
Or the good men they get, they run away for "self-preservation", there's always a term given to them to justify being the weakest link of civilization and frame it like a sovereignty crisis.
Always a victim, hence why they'll never be taken seriously as equals or peers, if you're not held accountable, you're not perceived as an equal or an authority. Apparently not even by womens own women's movements.
Women always have an excuse framed like an existential ultimatum and if you challenge that then you must be a misogynist.🤓🙄
*It's not women's fault that they aren't taught to be wives in the first place. Men have to realize that.* You have to, that's the part that's left out in this "American/Modern Woman" meme. Women are listening to someone's narrative, Even listened to the snake, women either obey norms that help them, or norms that will destroy them. Just because the ideals are coming from Feminism, doesn't mean they're not rigid norms.
And keep in mind this is a basketball wife, not some southern bell from the rural south who was raised to be a real woman and raises the quality of her husband because she is quality.
Aka The lost legend of the "Matriarch".
Let's not confuse the two, there's way too many sub-countries within the one nation of The U.S.A to broadbrush women as a homogenous group.
Is it majority? Arguably. But not all of em.
I will agree with OP that the best American women to marry haven't been born yet, or more likely: Are dead already.
Either pick your meet spots better or just go abroad with tampered expectations, because modernity has infected the entire planet in one way or another. And the quality of men in America aren't exactly 9 out of 10s either.
This is just the era you've been dealt. And it's not all on women, it's mainly on their alleged "movements" that don't get held accountable for what they're telling women, & warping their expectations of life and men. Only then to blame men when the egalitarian, socialist, female-centric ways don't work because they're not and have never been efficient.
That homie made a good observation the bob's acknowledging what he did wrong in the imprisonment chamber as Violet got them out simultaneously, didn't demean him when it easily could've & these days? Likely would've been written to do just that likely uncutting his monologue as a joke or something, especially with Helen reinforcing her own agency in the situation telling Dash not to interrupt him, that little detail is so good vs just sitting there passively & listening until Violet does her thing, everyone in those few seconds had something to do, Violet acted, Bob came full circle on his arc, Dash noticed Volet, Helen reinforced Bob's moment. Everyone had a part.
That man is paying attention to the writings nuance, much appreciated. And agreed. 1:31:15 could barely make him out over the others but he voiced exactly what that scene worked. the guy on the 2nd row on bottom, 2nd left box
2:09 Outside of the film, lets be real::: For Kara to go her own way is to retcon the cousin connection or just retcon her entirely from a universe that has a Superman already, or turn her into a Superman villain, or turn her into either Supermans daughter (Superman: secret identity) & he steps down, depowers with age, goes missing or dies honorably-- which technically is nepo still, but thats a way more organic torch pass, than a miracle survivor cousin which trivializes Kal surviving at all (And I STAND by that because it's 100% facts).
And a daughter being trained by Superman, Batman & WW displays she earns the mantle.
Vs the cousin just being handed the suit being of family ties, aka nepotism.
Or the DCAU route which was unintentionally better because STAS couldn't use Kara Zor-EL legally at the time so they just made her "In Ze" as a work around and that ended up being better anyway.
Kara can NOT go her own way getting by on nepotism. She can NOT go her own way wearing the same costume aesthetic, doing the same thing just with an edgy attitude or that cutesy cali-girl vibe, or the rough girly big sister schtick or the powergirl gimmick. Or whatever Woman of Tomorrow caught itself trying to do.
Just gimmicks, gimmicks, & another stock Kara Zor- El finds herself for the thousandth time filler arc. No substance. No purpose.
She's likeable, but her concept is likeable garbage.
I say this on every video on Kara Bore-El Disparu does that I happen to be on because it's true: The movie was doomed to be cheap, not bad, not the worst but weak knees because that reflects the character.
*To improve Supergirl is to rewrite the character entirely, DC & WB refuse to do that, they instead double-down and so--- this will keep happening.*
Not if the film had the guts, but if DC had the guts. But perhaps there's truth in that, because if the film did go that route, the comics would likely follow. Either way, the pivot has to start somehow.
She will never represent anything feminist when her namesake & stake is because of who she knows. Not what she's done. And the most significant thing she's ever done, twice was sacrifice herself, and it got undone; trivialized. Both times.
When if that was kept intact, she'd be immortalized, because both sacrifices were actually pretty moving, and that's coming from me.
When a manchild spoof of Superman (Prime) has a better character arc than Supergirl, while having a similar tragedy & origin parallel to hers, and far less material given to actually be a character vs a mascot; he's leagues more insufferable yet somehow has a more staple cult presence & nuance (and i use that lightly) than she ever did but she's the one that keeps getting chances, because of relation, not depth or global significance; Kara needs a rework, badly.
It has less to do with feminism & the actress, and everything to do with what you're adapting. Avatar The Last Airbender was plenty feminist, and that didn't stop it from owning.
2:09 There's a difference between scorning an audience that could have supported, or a movie of a character that has a fanbase, but no audience or meaningful significance in the first place. There's a difference.
Can't blame it all on politics or optics, not all of it; the material is just dry af.
If they made an adaptation of Kara's DC Nuclear Winter story, people would love it. Why? Because it's a moving story. I'd sooner recommend people read that than Woman of Tomorrow.
10:28 That's a false equivalence, basically being gaslighted to letting go of your hobbies sooner than you would have organically has nothing to do with this extreme reaction from this guy.
What this guy is doing is a very performative, or maybe he's a hundred percent dead Serious, but this is not an average reaction no more than the ppl overhyping this movie or nay-saying its quality because of box office. (its a solid movie, saw it twice)
This is a guy with a platform and a megaphone, who knows He's going to be listened to, just like the contrasting camp.
So the personal story is kind of mixed 10:28 , "Growing up" aka caving because someone attacked your tastes isnt growing up, its capitulating.
I would say the exact same If one mocked whatever the girls liked at the time that they likely still like now, or maybe they grew into tastes in their adult years that are actually very childish.
Ladies do so plenty with their romantic novels and fic writing, or blogs taking up whole pages shipping characters, self inserts, age play--- grown women btw with jobs.
Adopting Ocs and junk like they're 13yrs old still. Am I going to make a 5000 character article or a 10-20m in on that because someone said something I dont like about a movie? No, im good.
Point being: kinda more of a waste of time than a kid in 6th grade doodling. 👶It's a false equivalence.
Should they grow up because you shamed them out of liking something? and that's coming from me, the accountability guy. But there's a difference between persecution and accountability. What those girls did was persecution. they weren't holding you accountable because they wanted to help or even less likely because they saw untapped potential. Which a lot of women perceive even that young. The question is "motive?"
When you selectively put what you like into a subcategory of immaturity because someone else convinced you not to like what you like, when what they did in the first place>>>>⛔️ was immature⛔️<<<<, or likely intimidated that you had a passion for anything in your life or you had the audacity to openly display it, that was you getting played brotha.
So I get why rich made that example. The correlation is to not be so married to childish things that you become like that other guy. I agree with that.
Yet those girls saw a target and took their shot, if you wanted to recontextualize that or even at minimum, you saw the good in what they did despite how they did it, cope or no cope, that's fine; but from what the data you provided, don't turn it into something It wasn't after the fact just to fit that into this.
Example: someone made fun of that guy's tastes and instead turned him into what we're seeing right now. It depends on who you're dealing with, just mocking someone's interests isn't helping them.
Good on Op For looking at the glass half full vs declaring war on all women because of that experience, but I would take the lesson but without rationalizing it.
But that has less to do with the example you gave, cause its a stretch. because that growing up together sentiment is all fine and good. but if how what they did wouldn't work both ways. Then how they did it was a problem in the first place.
Essentially rationalizing being gaslighted out of ones own interest, that's where he loses me, we're not talking about a fetish that you would be better off without. We're talking about a simple pop culture staple for its era.
Because while this stuff is made for kids, I could say the same thing about avatar the last airbender, does that change the fact that it's a timeless classic for all ages, or that it completely narratively annihilates tv shows and animated projects that are air quotes more "mature" just in terms of writing.
Or the fact that adults wrote and made the content in the first place? so what do we really saying when we use that talking point?
What is it being made for kids have to do with anything?
I know a grown ass woman right now. Running her own business, sits down and watch the berenstain bears Because she likes the music. She likes the characters. She likes the healthy family dynamics. She even likes the setting itself. How relaxing it is, messages. Because technically, that show is made for a lower age bracket. Same with MLP, she binges that joint.
Despite having a nice phone, She will sit in the day room and watch it on full display.
Should I shame her And mock her for liking it as a grown woman, because technically, it isn't mature? despite the fact that i've asked plenty of questions and have stood by through plenty of episodes myself personally and was frankly impressed with what I saw from memes to pacing & themes.
But because of the age bracket and my idea of peers maturing together, because I'm either intimidated by the fact that she's open about it, or I feel some type of way because she has a passion for something and is open about it, or I have to adhere her to how I do things when what she's doing isn't a dysfunctional fetish behavior---- the question becomes, what was my motivation in the first place versus how she would rationalize what I did about her hobby in order to cope with it.
It's technically more normal for a minor to be doodling a fav IP versus violent tendencies because he has no hobbies or a grown ass woman watching children shows aimed for tots and kids.
Strictly: Thats if we wanted to be consistent to that train of logic.
TL;DR that raging guy in the video either has emotional regulation issues or one heckuva character to play for his content and those young ladies back then needed to mind their own business. 👈🗿
it's just such a weird fetish that they don't turn anyone indian or polynesian or spanish or mongolian or Japanese Okinawan or Norwegian (a caucasian? HISSssss); there's so many shades of the human identity ethnically to tap into, but it's always gotta be bland black african american, usually black female.
That specifically is interesting, it's so bizarre. And they do nothing with that background, absolutely nothing warranting the change, because most of these creatives know NOTHING of the ethnic background to use in the first place. But they like the reactions from the swap.
Just a base level DLC skin swap. 100% shallow.
That's not enough to ruin the entire book, but it says a lot about the writer that gimmicks matter more than substance. Could've made Barb a failed P.I or something, and her arc is becoming a realized detective & hacker through trailing Batman.
Something. From what I saw and remember, there was nothing of Barb worth intrigue in that issue worth talking about beyond the unnecessary swap & what says most about the writer: is that was likely the point.
so they do the same thing but he holds it against the dude more, because he's the man.
As opposed to the woman being what, not an adult? Or an Adult 2nd class license+ allowance to be burden without adult consequences (lifetime warranty).
See, this is, exhaustingly: is why so many women/ or at minimum: too many women, act like children with the confidence we will treat them like babies, aka a lower behavioral standard because girls will be girls. Or as the Black community puts it in othering fashion :::: "Females".
Which says what about women?
So condescending and disrespectful. This is how you treat a dependent you tolerate, not an equal. Ideally, you shouldn't even be this dismissive with your own children, in fact.
Yes, women need to vent more than men on average (also depending on personality) as part of the coping mechanism of a situation they perceive as overwhelming, but that's what actual social networks like friends & family are for and women are not the only ones who need to vent.
And even then, LTG is right that some things don't need to be said, but that applies to women too. The Internet is not their marital companion, and yet that's exactly how women treat an intangible, cold, unfeeling, biased, coddling feedback loop. It's unhealthy and for women specifically, it's dangerous because it becomes a dependency.
Same with men regarding porn, hyper-aggressive predation like Doxx or Swatting, troll culture and fetishism. It's a high.
POV: She's a female, but He should know better, because he's a man.
Excuse you, what?
Tl;Dr Can't respect women as peers and then infantilize them as if it's expected that they act like idiots. Nor can you treat them like that & then complain about the quality of women in the pool being poor, when you're part of the problem.
Can't have both.
I like these longer form videos, but I can always count on LTG pull this crap every single time. It's insufferable.
bro goes from Spider-Verse to He-Man, get yo bag brotha.
I didn't think it was possible for anyone to match Bear's theme and the crazy part is I FOUND this trying to find McCrearys themes in the first place. Sometimes the algorithm rewards my suffering.
Daniel Pemberton - The Power Of Grayskull
Sword of Power Guitar: Brian May
edit: after (consistently) hearing the movie was silly & campy already had me motivated to watch it. This beast of a gem sealed the deal. The synth keys are going crazy.
Zack actually moved on, and he's not wrong that the Grift-vengers are suspended comfortably in 2018-2020 but his own reasoning ability did indeed get worse and his ex-wife hate boner makes his coverage of said "birthday party clowns" (ook?) perpetually suspended just like them.
Difference is their content has better production value & they have & show receipts; they are drama kings yes, but they're not lying about the industry as a complex.
⛔Their problem is they often Project that reality on mediocre projects that in fact doesnt fit their narrative. Thats where they get it wrong.
⚠️But Our Boi zack? He moved on, but he didnt evolve. And the reality of the industry didn't just disappear because Zack chooses not to see it or doesn't realize it or chooses to ignore it because he prefers things to be better than they are. Zack will actually still criticize things from the media but if certain people do the exact same thing he does, then its a problem.
Anyone who speaks the contrary is the enemy; If you're the wrong Messenger, You're the enemy.👈
*4 times out of 20, Zacks criticism has applicable weight beyond "dur, you're old (said zack, the spry 19yr old male)"*
(ex. Nerdrotics pearl clutch tweet over Karen and Matt screenshot, which in reality was a hallway walking shot that barely lasted 3 -5 seconds, that was a valid criticism on zacks part)
majority of the time its bro confusing obsession with accountability. clownish. Even worse, Lolcow-ish on his part.
Comics Drama Matters era.🌭
_For the grifters: almost everything new is a threat to be wary of, And if you do happen to catch yourself excited for something, You have to have just enough cyncism & "maybes" to keep anyone from unsubbing_ (just ignore the fact that they On occasion do report things that they like & the subs resonate with it)
And for Zack, everything the grifters report as bad is actually good in La La Land even if it's dog shit and he himself likely wont watch it 3 months from now, a year, if ever again.
🎉If the industry complex says so, then we "enjoy" it & forget about it or dont like it, but its ok when Zack doesnt like something.
🎉If the griftvengers or the wrong ppl says its bad or mid, then we rebel and say its secretly good (self tell) or just a childrens movie ( Not an argument) or they're just old and will die anyway (get therapy). And when they praise something, we simply ignore that, conveniently. Or? Turn even that into a problem.
Very simple formula, bros channel is a dated time capsule in itself.
same insults, same talking points, stuck. what year? current, moving, no evolution, stuck anyway.
so that guy had it backwards but they are not wrong entirely. And while it is unfortunate, it's definitely not not entertaining.
Just remember & take with a grain of salt, that toxic positivity is more potent, because you don't need to blame it on anything, nor need an argument nor a reason, its far easier to bliss and consume. But be wary of extremes on either side of the binary.
There's no good or bad guys, you either have an argument or you don't.
But the modern woman as of 1990 to 2030: as a concept is built too fragile and brittle to be the connective tissue that is a "matriarch", the backbone of the "community" organism and the family.
The the civilizational pillar of an entity that feminism devalues for a CEO fetish, it's like the modern woman was designed to be a hyper-competent weaklink. Cause in theory, modern should mean upgrade, not factory flaw or Bugged Windows Update.
Too many modern women are incapable of being matriarchs because the work as a:
single
or as a mother
or as a wife & mother--
any work that demands too much, is a psychological crisis.
That's incompetence, then they run to the internet to be told by women, men, media, and academia that the issue is everyone else.
Because what she (in the video) is talking about is burnout, but mind you: if he didn't communicate & involve her in the decision making, that would also be undervaluing her opinion, and neglecting her from what gets done.
I won't obfuscate and say trash in the can one time made her go nutty, I'm sure it was recurring enough to build up her frustration; but the problem isn't her being frustrated at all, ever.
Not even 1950s housewives had that plastic smiley face 24/7, women are allowed to be frustrated without it being a "Feminism bad" video essay.
But the sheer lack of retrospect of how small, minute, and petty the situation is-- and her running to social media (women treating the internet like a therapist) to talk about her "amazing" point average husband: That specifically is telling.
That is where she shows her quality as a woman, and ironically: all for the world to see. That's the impulse of a teenage girl.
Single women talk about this too (burnout), so this isn't about marriage, this is about the caliber of woman that girls are cultivated to become:
Which despite feminism & woman worship culture's effort--- what you're curating isn't a leader, but a consumer & part-time laborer who doesn't want to work too hard, and will quit at the drop of a hat.
She even admits that the guy is amazing-- so the amount of work women with her mindset perceive as disproportionate:
they take it as a threat to their agency, they sit in proverbial corner & stew on their brewing self-agitation, feeling powerless and thus seeding resentment when to claim agency is to just open her mouth and speak to him. Especially if he's as allegedly communicative as she describes.
This is the same self-torturing misery Scott Carey put his own dumbass through the entire book of The Incredible Shrinking Man 1956; see most people read it and think "the limits of Masculinity", "Fragility of Masculinity", "Critique of Masculinity". When Scott's fragility, and seeding resentment at a perceived scoreboard imbalance, & externalizing it on everyone around him, pushing people away, burning himself out instead of taking accountability.
Is more accurately representing Post-2000 Modern women's own fragility than anything patriarchal.
And to run to social media to hunt for someone to tell them they're in they're in the right. (Buzzfeed, Reddit etc.)
And all that does is guarantee the quality of woman either stagnates or drops, same goes for men in their echo chambers, and the endless posturing.
Egalitarianism, Feminism, & transactional relationships destroyed the quality of women.
Not just one of those is at fault, none of them are at fault as a single thing (because they all serve a constructive purpose in their own right but it has to be in combination to something else that actually produces something.
*Traditional Nuclear unit,
Patriarchal resources,
mutual anchoring/Co-dependency/maturity/duty),
but the specific combination of all 3 (without accountability btw) is why too many women are so inept at co-habitation.
It's not even their fault, if these women were born 50-60 years ago, but this culture prevailed decades before their birth, this isn't their or men's fault. It's a collective failure.
I've said it before: "Village" skill issue.
Mind you, what he's doing disproportionately that she isn't paying back on doesn't register to her mind. This is the problem with "mankeeping", these labels academia provide women is under the pretense, that a woman's best interest is the actual relationship. That's why when "keeping" is brought up, Lesbians are nowhere near the discussion. The men have to be the scapegoat and beaten into the ground.
There can't ever be a moral for everyone to learn from, someone has to be made an example of.
Her only reality is her immediate inconvenience of being involved in what goes on in their house repeatedly, think about how backwards that is.
If she wasn't the project manager but instead a spectator because he had it down, presumably she would feel left out or have less agency in her own house because he insists on doing everything, then he'd be a control freak.
And you know 100% that's how this would be spun.
She's as involved as her foremothers were, they could handle it (for better & for worse, with less resources, less opportunities; no reddit to cry to, no tiktoks) and despite having every advantage they didn't have--- she's complaining to the world that she has to take out trash or give the man a layout of the children's lunch; the problem is being an adult consecutively and inconveniently.
I 100% do not blame her, you know why?
Zero stamina or endurance, that's not a birthed trait, but a curated outcome.
This is what many of are molded to become, a nerfed human being. Dead weight with scoreboards in their heads; making themselves miserable with paranoia that they're being slighted or de-valued or someone's out to get them. Aka Scott Carey.
A lot of women have valid grievances with their partners, normal orientation or lesbian, but the common thread with "mankeeping" is NOT a man, it's a woman terrorizing herself with her own subjective scoreboard. Aka Scott Carey.
And at worse: incompetence as a partner. Worst? Inability to even be an adult without self-destructing.
I hold her accountable for being a child about this, but I don't blame her for acting on it; the country she lives in won't hold her accountable, social media will likely vindicate her one-sided report or just unleash vitriol that will only reinforce her bias. Either way, she will be validated and learn nothing & continue to be an American Modern Woman.
Which is not a label of "Peak Woman in Human History" but somehow a derogatory term, not in the media of course but in the spaces that matter: the everyday person.
What does a "modern woman" even mean? A Success story or a jumbled mess, or a mascot that academia manipulates with flattery, one mansult at a time.
Because why was she designed to NOT be a functional wife & mother and know how to voice her own exhaustion TO THE MAN she's talking about vs venting to strangers on social media like a disgruntled teenager about the guy behind his back.
Will anyone getting the top comment on her video check her like this? Likely not. And that's why women keep doing this.
This is the model of woman girls are reduced to, less than half of their power, barely a quarter. And yet your nations media has the word "empowerment" in their mouths.
It's always glorifying the career, the slave of wages, the feminist ideal--- and not the mother, the matriarch, the glue that keeps civilization sane. That part won't get empowered, and when it does? A man is often removed from the picture. #ProudSingleMom
Society is trying to kill itself. CEO's, GirlBosses & BadBitches aren't going step up when Civilization collapses and there's no feminism to re-build from the ashes.
Feminism is the luxury movement AFTER the men get civilization to a certain point, women don't act like this before that fact. And the women before that turningpoint, they had less to work with and kept their worlds intact anyway.
The women who get it done, don't complain to social media; they walk away from the problem when there's no solution, they get advice from mama or a mentor or a friend who's managed it; or they communicate to the spouse to resolve the matter or (god forbid) fix the issue in themselves like functional adults.
This is the outcome of egalitarian/ transactional feminist progress in this specific context; the modern woman, career fortified & politically active to her own detriment and destruction: a beautiful castle of glass, crumbling under her own weight, whether married or single, either way; she either cracks and or crumbles.
Blame/ hold responsible the people who built the castle. Hold accountable the movements selling women a dream they can't realistically fulfill.
i'd be the first one to say "it aint that deep, brotha snob", but snob has been out here calling this out. He's not obsessing over these people for no reason, let alone obsessing, he's reporting goons and snakes because most ppl wont. I certainly don't have the time or patience for this bullshit, so kudos to Snob.
Fact is--- Chibi is a hypocrite, and I repeat my previous scorched earth rant--- i can only imagine what this dude finna do when he hit 60 yrs old.
*this is quite the legacy he's curating for himself or has curated (past tense).*
Cause if snob has been calling this out for a decade, think about the implications of that--via how long chibi has been at this bullshit.
*We got to witness the internet & otaku culture ruin this kid's/ this mans mind in real time and he argues "foreign culture" as a shield; and when that doesn't work (cause it's not an argument) then he goes to 'fiction doesn't affect reality' clause, when quite literally to possess a fantasy is to translate or mistranslate actual traits of observable reality, then morph it through trauma & experience and thus fabricate a narrative in creative or multi-dimensional fashion aka media fiction aka FICTION.*
TL;DR Fiction comes from the thing that chibi claims it doesn't effect, but somehow despite it directly/indirectly (not interchangeable btw, not all fantasy is created equal) deriving from reality, despite fiction having objective benefits to many people (which he would cosign in a heartbeat) but at the VERY SAME TIME it does NOT affect reality negatively.*
Convenient isn't it? Age of consent isn't the hill to die on, now he's on his "fiction" talking point, every balls to the wall stance this guy claims to stand for, he always defeats himself.
Because that's not how that works.
Fiction is very much married to reality as the state of wetness is correlated with liquid.
And he's some weeb outsider from the west that likely doesn't know the first thing about Japanese culture. The kicker is, he's creating & enabling more young minds to be just like him, hence "Chibitz" or Cheezits or whatever the fuck he creepily calls these cats. That's really the worst part, not his fall, but he's dragging others with him.
Brotha is quickly approach if not arguably has already crossed the threshold of a lolcow.
And all he had to do was just divorce Anime from the pedestal he put it on, that simple stipulation would've prevented most of this shit he's on, not all, not even the worst of his lore, but it would've lessened most of it.
I pity this guy, if someone made a sped up 60 second montage of his gradual corrosion over the years, it'd be a tragedy in motion.
Could he change? Sure, but he has zero incentive to do so. That's what destroys a lot of young men & women today, social media makes it too easy to surround yourself with enablement. ZERO incentive to change.
