"I hate everything about having a giantess fetish" /r

"I hate the fact that I want to give up my freedom to a horny giant."

we're not delivered into life to be destroyed, violated or played with; there's nothing to give your "freedom" up to, love yourself enough to let childish things go.

"I hate that I prefer tall girls. And the thought of the possibility of overlooking my soulmate just because I’m head over heels over a girl who’s taller than them."

Preferring tall girls is not a problem, hyper-fixation is issue. Don't view people through the lens of fetishism, if there's no logical/legitimate reason to why you're stuck on that one thing, then re-evaluate it, trace it back to the roots. Know thyself.

"Worse, what if that potential soulmate likes me back? What would they think about me if I overlooked them because of some stupid giantess fetish?"

it's not about what someone thinks. Even with the best VR experience-- it will still never exist, sustain, or bring any meaningful purpose, that's where the need for retreat to fantasy comes from for many: Lack of purpose, lack of stake in reality, which many men suffer in Japan, America, etc. & to no one's surprise Macrophilia surges in countries where men are suffering, neglected, or left behind by the culture.

One can only play make believe. Thus a counterfeit anti-reality.

 

You need to decide if a counterfeit experience you feel beholden to surrender your freedom to for some reason, a parody mocking humanity, mocking women (the main resource of the fantasy) is worth prioritizing over the only life you'll have to live in THIS life.

 

Let alone how it dictates how you view other human beings because of how much real estate you might be giving to the deluded fixation, getting a grip on that is more important than what someone thinks.

"I hate the fact that I get chills when a tall girl stands over me, and I can’t help but grossly fetishize them."

Getting chills over something that basic, is trivial, concerning &, if you "can't help" it, take breaks.

 

Question it, always. But hating yourself / or the fetish, is pointless.

 Freedom is what you feel you have to give up, so your freedom for your mind is exactly what you take back. Divorce it through distance, make that the new habit, that's the only real way to take control.

"Owning it" or accepting it is just more surrender through adoption. Cope for cope, which is another means to submit to it to avoid letting it go because of lack of security without it, paradoxical. The illusion of control.
Start with 24 hours, upgrade to 2 days, & so on, without it. Once a week even, gradual.
Reality is the solution, to find security/protection/affirmation here. Not in Lalaland for entire life.

"I don’t want to think of taller girls as these protective gentle giants. I want to just want to think of them like I do everyone else."

As you shouldn't think tall girls as such, it's off-base. Good for you for questioning it..

 

"protective gentle giants" is both sweet in sentiment and a bit creepy just by how out of touch it is, because it's basically wanting mommy (the first significant giant in a babys life usually), which is GTS & 'shrinking' in a nutshell: regression, going backwards. Infantilism.

You are fully capable of seeing tall girls as they are (like everyone else), you need to give your brain a break from the nonsense, let it detox, doesn't mean the thoughts will just say "Bye" but if you're not pounding your mind with it, you're less likely to be ruled by it.

 

"I hate the feeling of inferiority, and the fact that it makes me hard."

Thin air can get a guy hard, it just happens dude.
Otherwise that's the era you live in, manhood crisis. Masculinity attacked constantly, boys lacking mentors. Fathers are inept, trivialized or just absent. #FutureisFemale, all that jazz

 

It's not like the West respects or honors men, the ppl that build EVERYTHING. So this desire for inferiority is not "weird", because we know where it comes from: western society's decline

 Its a consequence of Gynocentric declining civilization that men tangibly built & yet are neglected by constantly into feeling insignificant & having zero stake in it, thus many feel small.

 

It's a generational bondage for our boys, men in japan are going through something similar. Again, this is why many retreat to the counterfeit for a false sense of security through surrender or parody of reality.

"I hate that to me girls are like some protective weapon, I don’t think of anyone as unworthy of my attention, but I can’t help but notice the giants because of my stupid fetish."

Because your mind was oversaturated with internet sewage, pounded into your head until the subconscious lens of the world was legitimately violated, that's how propaganda works, distortion of reality.

 

There's nothing wrong with you beyond what you're subjecting yourself to for no meaningful reason.

 

A fetish is not an inherent, nor a sacred trait ppl should just tolerate, it's not above challenge. It's an imprinting glitch. Random, not destiny.
It's not something mom or dad nor antiquity passed down to you as an evolutionary advantage. It's advantageous of absolutely nothing, a mockery of human connection, meaningless.
You have it on the brain, cause ya gave it too much real estate. Take a break.
Adulting 101: Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.

"This isn’t a role play post. I genuinely hate having this fetish, and how it makes me fetishize people."

Understood, respect for you being brave to express dissent. More should do so.

 

Sexualizing a person and fetishizing them is not the same thing, one sexualizes when they see physical traits for reproductive purpose. Fetishizing is projecting unrealistic obsession specific based delusions specifically, not always sexual or for reproduction but paraphilia vs reducing someone to a thing of criteria, because a misconception one adopted.

 

Show adoration, but don't fetishize people. The fetish is not making you do anything, you're not powerless here, this is part of the lie of the fantasy bleeding into IRL. Your mind is acting out in times of arousal because it's been trained to associate one with the other from repeat reinforcements on your neurological pathways, especially if you splooge to it, it's science.

It's nothing worth hate, nor endorsement, it's worth overcoming. Try replacing it with something more productive, keeping busy, form new habits, learn a language, find something, re-train the brain.

 

"X-chromosome inactivation and its role in autoimmune susceptibility in females", Response to a minor excerpt in an overall solid article.

"The silence of the second X, Women have too much of a good thing: It's called the X chromosome.

Throughout the mammalian kingdom, biological sex is determined by the presence, in every female cell, of two X chromosomes. Males cells pack just one X chromosome, paired with a much shorter one designated the Y chromosome.

The stubby Y chromosome contains only a handful of active genes. It's quite possible to live a full life without a Y chromosome. In fact, more than half of the people on Earth -; women -; lack Y chromosomes and do just fine. But no mammalian cell, male or female, can survive without at least one copy of the X chromosome, which holds many hundreds of active protein-specifying genes." 

"The stubby Y chromosome contains only a handful of active genes.", 

Because it lacks recombination & thus mutations gathered overtime = loss of genes. And yet those handful of genes left are necessities that were spared by design by it's gene regulators which is why it's still active. 

The Y Chromosome is the original: "Less is more" metaphor.

Thus those handful of genes are in fact all it needs. It's a condensed, less excessive, tho albeit relatively less efficient chromosome partner, in contrast to X Chromosome. And X Chromosome is less cluttered, more healthy contrast Y Chromosome.

(for some reason this comment didn't show up the first time i posted it, so i'll post it again)

"stubby Y Chromosome", was that descriptor truly necessary to make your point after already describing it as "short" literally at the end the previous sentence? Or is this your attempt to lightly jab the Y Chromosome like many MANY researchers do whenever it's brought up-  

(which is half of the reason for this address, not just this one article saying "stubby", for by itself is simply a descriptor, & whether not it's an issue is frankly subjective. But a broader observation of speakers being defensive or dismissive or even spiteful on the matter being frankly unprofessional with their language. I've seen some worse than this article, so "stubby" wasn't the trigger but it was an epiphany moment because it just didn't sound right compared to how solid the framing of the other 99% of the piece is. Make it stand out more, like a hang nail. )

" It's quite possible to live a full life without a Y chromosome. In fact, more than half of the people on Earth -; women -; lack Y chromosomes and do just fine."

Obviously, that goes without saying.

I think we all know women can exist "just fine" without a Y. That doesn't require a justification, even with the context of "Autoimmune Disease", because some men also get it (men still possess an X chromosome), each side gets a buff, and a consequence is attached to that buff.♀️♂️

Such a fraction of a statement compared to the rest of the article yet it has a loud tone of unnecessary compensation. Clearly, women are fine without a Y, but another X does cause problems men don't have to deal with. That's the reality. 

It's okay to say.

It often comes across as not a "vs them" but very close to it, a contest, which is a very unfortunate attitude I pick up from a lot of sources from the west. Jenny Graves is one of the more nuanced, mature voices on the matter, reliable, & knowledgeable. ✅

As unfortunate as Autoimmune disease is, In a way males not having another X causing such issues as much is a more balanced model, yet on top of the physical advantages. But only to an extent because there's issues of having a Y and the absence of another X or an efficient recombination peer for Y- which is why women live longer, and if they do get sick, it's not for long.

• while women's immune systems are superior due to another X, Autoimmune disease and this stronger immune system can sometimes lead to overactivity, making women more susceptible to autoimmune conditions like lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, and multiple sclerosis. So there is a price.

Thus issues in males that women don't have to deal with & in reverse is more evident that each sex is the missing piece of an incomplete human in a poetic sense, which is why the result of the two in physical unity is creation of new life.

To reiterate: the autoimmune disease is a result of women's immune systems being better wired than the average man's immune system, it's as much an extremity as a man's physical strength is/testosterone is (lower immune function, higher injury/mortality rates). A common health problem for women, essentially, arose from an advantage. 

It goes both ways, a balance. 

It wouldn't then be necessary to say "Men get along just fine without another X, it's possible to live a full life without it" as if trying to prove something to the audience or justify anything. It's unnecessary rhetoric, or even if the intent wasn't that, the framing was a little awkward.

Divorced from this source, If more figures of academic authority in general, let alone lower level outlets (including amateurs) stopped throwing cheap jabs at the Y Chromosome and overcompensating whenever a contrast between males and females comes up in this subject as if this is yet another competition or an indicative statement of women and men themselves, which it's NOT--

👁️👄👁️

These studies would then improve and be a better reading experience, & leagues more professional and reliable vehicle without the cringe and lowkey resentment. Because the energy I see & read on Y Chromosome topics, I don't see on purely X Chromosome articles. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

That awkward insertion aside, this was well informed overall as a read. It helped.

And I stand by that, the article is solid information on the matter (disregarding that moot, minor rhetoric)

https://www.news-medical.net/news/20240201/X-chromosome-inactivation-and-its-role-in-autoimmune-susceptibility-in-females.aspx"

That's it. Overall it is a decent enough article, but people (not everyone but many experts) overall get weird whenever Y gets compared to X, no idea why, yet I know exactly why and it's so dated & predictable; western cultural resentment of anything male really needs to be addressed and treated in itself. 

Too many of us prefer controlled narratives wrapped in polished opinions called "theories", than professional theories rooted in the facts that is, not the matters we project onto the subject, starting with our language. 

-2024

Twitter Doesn't Like My Zelda Video...

14:39 The "just drawings" deflections has never been a good argument or reasoning. It's exactly that, deflection, excuses. There's a big difference between how Codename Kids Next Door depicts children and how Japans Anime AND MANGA depicts kids on mass. I'm not even talking about the intentionally dark stories like "Bokurano" or "Now and Then, Here and There" but the loli fetishy stuff. I like Mitsudomoe for example, it's hilarious, yet that show really needed to be toned down in a lot of areas. It gets very very fresh with those little kid characters and out of line with how certain adult characters acted around those kids. *But thats normal for that country then they wonder why they have so many assault cases against women and children in a country with a mega industry that casually dehumanizes women and children. Coincidence i'm sure. Or why their birthrates are tanking when they enable young men to remain mentally suspended boys salivating over jailbait* Loli Is attachment to fetishizing innocence, it's less about the girls and more about the vulnerability, the infantilism. Innocence. That's the whole appeal, the innocence, a ripe pure prospect. Purity. Cute. Women can hurt you, a loli pleases by just being cute. A glorified pet. It's not the drawing entirely, it's not the fiction, it's the implication of it and WHY one gravitates to it in the first place. Why people clamor around it as with any fetishism. It's not always what, but usually why, when, and how. WHY. Not why a 13 yr old is into it (you're afforded ignoramus exception points as a teenager), but why a 19-39+ year old is still latched onto it. There are some things you don't entertain or play with, that's part of growing the hell up, letting childish things go--- Knowing when not to do something. "it's just a drawing" is not the appropriate response, it's not even relevant, it just enables. The response is "where is that coming from?" in the head of the artist. "Why was that the best they had to offer to the rest of the species?" Enough excuses, we need more dissection & accountability. And then national IQ points will stop tanking faster the birthrates. Accountability mitigates bigger social issues from even happening when you stop pretending the little things don't matter