Gillette Lost $9 Billion Trying to Fix Men "A price worth paying" -- there is no "toxic masculinity"

“"A price worth paying"”

there is no "toxic masculinity", there's bad behavior, and bad behavior isn't gendered. The whole point of the term is to make certain  bad behavior a male phenomenon, a gaslight than a genuine call for accountability. And when its all said & done, it's not a razor company's job to tell people how to act. That's the parents job, a brand is not a parent.

This is the problem.

Asking a woman for her number isn't harassment, it's inconvenient. Persistence, ignoring context clues of visible disinterest is harassment.

• Because hypothetically: she dropped her wallet or something, would inconveniencing her in the street then be harassment because interacting with a woman AT ALL is now harassment?  "Why aren't men approaching women anymore?"
• Or is simply wanting to talk to her on the basis of sexual pursuit specifically the problem? So what happens when women approach men? (And more are doing so, as I’ve personally seen)

Specifically it's inconvenient if the timing is inconvenient. Very simple.

Humans make the simplest human interactions as harassment then women wonder why no one approaches anymore, “what happened to men?” becomes the next gaslight. 

• When women silently want to be approached as if men are dogs to perform on psychic command, but should stay away when she doesn’t want to be bothered, that’s not how that shit works. At that point just wear a neon sign that says “approach” or “piss off”.

Furthermore, Women are some of the best bullies i've ever seen, as with female PDF’s: They’re not rare, they’re just better at it & way more subtle. 

Many of which are mothers, sisters, co-workers, & wives. Women are excellent at cutting people off, this narrative of fickle women with their heads hung low in the office is hilarious, especially when you’ve worked under female tyrants (co-worker or boss) who were untouchable because they could weaponize their womanhood against the bureaucracy:

But you’ll never see that reality in an ad.

 I've had to rewrite how I speak to people when starting a few jobs because the women I spoke to were so overbearing and toxic. I've had to adopt more controlled domineering composure in the past decade just to get women to respect boundaries. Many of these women had positions of power, most did not & shared the same bad behavior but had the "pussy pass" which is more than enough power. 

Is it women being toxic masculine? Is it toxic femininity, because they did the exact same thing but their sex gave them passes, even other women hesitated to say anything. Or are they just women with no house training, exuding bad behavior?

And not all the women I've talked to did this, but so many did I had to legitimately rework my social methodology & not just American women.

And sexual harassment, women do in spades, mainly verbally, touching arms, blocking doorways, groping. The difference is they get away with it AND without controversy or an article, & they didn't have to know the right people to get off. They were women, that's all it took.

"Girls will be girls" We saying this when another white woman is caught sleeping with another 12 yr old child & doesn't get 20 to  life in prison?

So is a tampon company supposed to press women about what women with bad behavior do? See how stupid this is? Despite what I’ve said in the past, this really isn’t all about misandry: it is, but it’s more so about a gaslight posing as accountability.

As i said. It's not toxic masculinity, it's bad behavior being universally unacceptable. 

The point of making "masculinity"+ toxic because a man is behaving bad at the time, is to make those specific bad behaviors an association to maleness as an existence. So then maleness is something to be “fixed”.

Even a "pussy pass" both has merit and is a problem, because that implies men don't get passes, not true. Women get heaps more (relatively, because if you have liberal leaders sometimes racial or gender identity politics take priority over womens well being) due to the very real biological bias but a "pussy pass" should be "pretty pass" which can apply to men. Because an unattractive woman couldnt pull off what a Margot Robbie clone could.

Toxic Masculinity is a cultural gaslighting OP/ operation and many people have taken the bait. Because that was the goddamn point, these labels are scientifically constructed to an intended affect.

That's why the ad didn't work, it's making behavior women do in droves into a male specific issue. 

•  women didn't ask for this, women are not the scapegoat here either. 

And no, it's not a price worth paying, because these companies aren't paying for it. Civilization is.

• Women's education delays having children, but men retreating, resentment, regression, frustration: DEMORALIZATION, guarantees babies/ family making doesn't happen, period.
• If boys remain boys, glued to fetishes & fantasy to run away from predatory society. Fertility rates become a statistical redundance. 
• Most Women aren’t studying to become astronauts, so education slows birthrates but it doesn't drop birthrates. So when studies & Ai chat mentions "education" take it with a grain of salt because those same sources will never admit that propagandizing American/Westernwomen into being undesirable is actually what killed birthrates, not women doing better vs the quality of woman tanking dramatically-- and because the women have tanked, the bar or length men go to to be decent drops. And yes, women do that have that effect and stake on men, as men do to the women.

The entire problem is we've told women that making a living makes men unnecessary, and so women think making money makes them sufficient without men and men are taking the bait thinking a woman making more means he's less than. 

The entire point is to make women into something they're not: "Independent", because autonomy (woman finds herself first) became Self-worship (woman lives for herself for better and for worse) which becomes Isolation, Loneliness or both.

• Shit like this for 30+ years is what drops birthrates & demoralizes men AND women from trying. When people give up, when men give up, it’s game over. 
• Because if the women opt out and men still try, there's hope, men are persistent if they're allowed to be.
•  When the men opt to be boys forever while the women are still trying, multitudes of women in public places, available and waiting, nothing happens because the women have no game, or wanting to give men achance, same men who were told to stay away; and all the males are either passing it up for their own safety or masturbating to goddesses, waifus, any stupid shit they can invent to replace women.
• Or hooking up which means less than nothing Or running away to other countries because their homeland ruined men & women's future for the sake of female "self-actualization" Or "accountability" which means "Men on trial". And running abroad to these women is no solution, because we all have highs and low, & low quality american woman often means also low quality american man. 
• Dont run away from your women.
• You have no enemies. 

So no: It WAS NOT WORTH IT.

Some behaviors are divided in disproportion (violent crime), however this is why I bring up female PDF’s, because you don’t see them doing it or it's not reported as much, is not admission of the absence of it happening. 

Women being better at bad behavior, more subtle at toxicity to the point it’s an artform vs the male tendency to use bad behavior as a louder statement of status, testosterone makes them less cognizant of consequence, thus they’re the mascots of it- 

doesn’t omit women as a participant in said behavior despite being majority of the species. To some degree, that is statistically improbable.

And it's not right to the cause of accountability, because you’re intentionally making it seem as if femaleness is an outlier to bad behavior. 

“Toxic Masculinity” The label is clinically by design manipulative & literally nonsensical.