Gillette Lost $9 Billion Trying to Fix Men "A price worth paying"

“"A price worth paying"”

there is no "toxic masculinity", there's bad behavior, and bad behavior isn't gendered. The whole point of the term is to make certain  bad behavior a male phenomenon, a gaslight than a genuine call for accountability. And when its all said & done, it's not a razor company's job to tell people how to act. That's the parents job, a brand is not a parent.

This is the problem.

Asking a woman for her number isn't harassment, it's inconvenient. Persistence, ignoring context clues of visible disinterest is harassment.

• Because hypothetically: she dropped her wallet or something, would inconveniencing her in the street then be harassment because interacting with a woman AT ALL is now harassment? 
• Or is simply wanting to talk to her on the basis of sexual pursuit specifically the problem? So what happens when women approach men? (And more are doing so, as I’ve personally seen)

Specifically it's inconvenient if the timing is inconvenient. Very simple.

Humans make the simplest human interactions as harassment then women wonder why no one approaches anymore, “what happened to men?” becomes the next gaslight. 

• When women silently want to be approached as if men are dogs to perform on psychic command, but should stay away when she doesn’t want to be bothered, that’s not how that shit works. At that point just wear a neon sign that says “approach” or “piss off”.

Furthermore, Women are some of the best bullies i've ever seen, as with female PDF’s: They’re not rare, they’re just better at it & way more subtle. 

Many of which are mothers, sisters, co-workers, & wives. Women are excellent at cutting people off, this narrative of fickle women with their heads hung low in the office is hilarious, especially when you’ve worked under female tyrants (co-worker or boss) who were untouchable because they could weaponize their womanhood against the bureaucracy:

But you’ll never see that reality in an ad.

 I've had to rewrite how I speak to people when starting a few jobs because the women I spoke to were so overbearing and toxic. I've had to adopt more controlled domineering composure in the past decade just to get women to respect boundaries. Many of these women had positions of power, most did not & shared the same bad behavior.

Is it women being toxic masculine? Is it toxic femininity, because they did the exact same thing but their sex gave them passes, even other women hesitated to say anything. Or are they just women with no house training, exuding bad behavior?

And not all the women I've talked to did this, but so many did I had to legitimately rework my social methodology & not just American women.

And sexual harassment, women do in spades, mainly verbally, touching arms, blocking doorways. The difference is they get away with it AND without controversy or an article, & they didn't have to know the right people to get off. They were women, that's all it took.

"Girls will be girls" We saying this when another white woman is caught sleeping with another 12 yr old child & doesn't get 20 to  life in prison?

So is a tampon company supposed to press women about what women with bad behavior do? See how stupid this is? Despite what I’ve said in the past, this really isn’t all about misandry: it is, but it’s more so  about a gaslight posing as accountability.

As i said. It's not toxic masculinity, it's bad behavior being universally unacceptable. 

The point of making "masculinity"+ toxic because a man is behaving bad at the time, is to make those specific bad behaviors an association to maleness as an existence. So then maleness is something to be “fixed”.

It's a cultural gaslighting OP/ operation and many people have taken the bait. Because that was the goddamn point, these labels are scientifically constructed to an intended affect.

Thats why the ad didn't work, it's making behavior women do in droves into a male specific issue. 

•  women didn't ask for this, women are not the scapegoat here either. 
• And no, it's not a price worth paying, because these companies aren't paying for it. Civilization is.
• Women's education delays having children, but men retreating guarantees it doesn't happen, period.
• If boys remain boys, glued to fetishes & fantasy to run away from predatory society. Fertility rates become a statistical redundance. 
• Most Women aren’t studying to become astronauts, so education slows birthrates but it doesn't drop birthrates.
• Shit like this for 30+ years is what drops birthrates & demoralizes people from trying. When people give up, when men give up, it’s game over.

Some behaviors are divided in disproportion (violent crime), however this is why I bring up female PDF’s, because you don’t see them doing it, is not admission of the absence of it happening. Women being better at bad behavior, more subtle at toxicity to the point it’s an artform vs the male tendency to use bad behavior as a louder statement of status, thus they’re the mascots of it- doesn’t omit women as a participant in said behavior despite being majority of the species. To some degree, that is statistically improbable.

And it's not right to the cause of accountability, because you’re intentionally making it seem as if femaleness is an outlier to bad behavior. 

“Toxic Masculinity” The label is clinically & literally nonsensical.