/re " This is the type of woman you need to avoid" | Modern women are not the entire problem

 Women aren't delicate, not naturally. 

But the modern woman as of 1990 to 2030: as a concept is built too fragile and brittles to be the connective tissue that is a "matriarch", the backbone of the "community" organism and the family. 

The the civilizational pillar of an entity that feminism devalues for a CEO fetish. 

Too many modern women are incapable of being matriarchs because the work as a:

•  single
•  or as a mother 
• or as a wife & mother-- 
• any work that demands too much, is a psychological crisis. 

That's incompetence.

 Because what she (in the video) talking about is burnout, but mind you: if he didn't communicate & involve her in the decision making, that would also be undervaluing her opinion, and neglecting her from what gets done. 

I won't obfuscate and say trash in the can one time made her go nutty, I'm sure it was recurring enough to build up her frustration; but the problem isn't her being frustrated at all, ever. 

Not even 1950s housewives had that plastic smiley face 24/7, women are allowed to be frustrated without it being a "Feminism bad" video essay. But the sheer lack of retrospect of how small, minute, and petty the situation is-- and her running to social media to talk about her "amazing" point average husband: That specifically is telling.

That is where she shows her quality as a woman, and ironically: all for the world to see. That's the impulse of a teenage girl.

Single women talk about this too (burnout), so this isn't about marriage, this is about the caliber of woman that girls are cultivated to become:

Which despite feminism & woman worship culture's effort--- what you're curating  isn't a leader, but a consumer & part-time laborer who doesn't want to work too hard, and will quit at the drop of a hat. 

She even admits that the guy is amazing--  the amount of work women with her mindset perceive as disproportionate:

•  they take it as a threat to their agency, they sit in proverbial corner & stew on their brewing self-agitation, feeling powerless and thus seeding resentment when to claim agency is to just open her mouth and speak to him. Especially if he's as allegedly communicative as she describes.
•  And to run to social media to hunt for someone to tell them they're in they're in the right. (Buzzfeed, Reddit etc.)

And all that does is guarantee the quality of woman either stagnates or drops, same goes for men in their echo chambers. 

Egalitarianism, Feminism, & transactional relationships destroyed the quality of women.

Not just one of those is at fault, none of them are at fault as a single thing (because they all serve a constructive purpose in their own right but it has to be in combination to something else *Traditional Nuclear unit, Patriarchal resources, mutual anchoring/Co-dependency/maturity/duty), but the specific combination of all 3 (without accountability btw) is why too many women are so inept at co-habitation.

It's not even their fault, if these women were born 30 years ago, but this culture prevailed decades before their birth, this isn't their or men's fault. It's a collective failure.

I've said it before: "Village" skill issue.

Mind you, what he's doing disproportionately doesn't register to her mind.

 Her only reality is her immediate inconvenience of being involved in what goes on in their house repeatedly, think about how backwards that is.

If she wasn't the project manager but instead a spectator because he had it down, presumably she would feel left out or have less agency in her own house because he insists on doing everything, then he'd be a control freak. 

She's as involved as her foremothers were, they could handle it (for better & for worse, with less resources) and despite having every advantage they didn't have--- she's complaining to the world that she has to take out trash or give the man a layout of the children's lunch; the problem is being an adult consecutively and inconveniently.

I 100% do not blame her, you know why? 

Zero stamina or endurance, that's not a birthed trait, but a curated outcome. This is what they're molded to become, dead weight with scoreboards in their heads; making themselves miserable with paranoia that they're being slighted or de-valued or someone's out to get them.

• A lot of women have valid grievances with their partners, normal orientation or lesbian, but the common thread with "mankeeping" is NOT a man, it's a woman terrorizing herself with her own subjective scoreboard. 
• And at worse: incompetence as a partner. 

I hold her accountable for being a child about this, but I don't blame her for acting on it; the country she lives in won't hold her accountable, social media will likely vindicate her one-sided report or just unleash vitriol that will only reinforce her bias. Either way, she will be validated and learn nothing & continue to be an American Modern Woman. 

Because why was she designed to NOT be a functional wife & mother and know how to voice her own exhaustion TO THE MAN she's talking about vs venting to strangers on social media like a disgruntled teenager.

This is the model of woman girls are reduced to, less than half of their power, barely a quarter. And yet your nations media has the word "empowerment" in their mouths.

The women who get it done, don't complain to social media; they walk away from the problem when there's no solution, they get advice from mama or a mentor or a friend who's managed it; or they communicate to the spouse to resolve the matter or (god forbid) fix the issue in themselves like functional adults.

This is the outcome of egalitarian/ transactional feminist progress; the modern woman, career fortified & politically active to her own detriment: a beautiful castle of glass, crumbling under her own weight whether married or single, either way; she either cracks and or crumbles.

Blame/ hold responsible the people who built the castle.

/re "LMAO Chibi Reviews freedom of speech hypocrisy" | Tragedy in motion

 

 i'd be the first one to say "it aint that deep, brotha snob", but snob has been out here calling this out. He's not obsessing over these people for no reason, let alone obsessing, he's reporting goons and snakes because most ppl wont. I certainly don't have the time or patience for this bullshit, so kudos to Snob. Fact is--- Chibi is a hypocrite, and I repeat my previous scorched earth rant--- i can only imagine what this dude finna do when he hit 60 yrs old. *this is quite the legacy he's curating for himself or has curated (past tense).* Cause if snob has been calling this out for a decade, think about the implications of that--via how long chibi has been at this bullshit. *We got to witness the internet & otaku culture ruin this kid's/ this mans mind in real time and he argues "foreign culture" as a shield; and when that doesn't work (cause it's not an argument) then he goes to 'fiction doesn't affect reality' clause, when quite literally to possess a fantasy is to translate or mistranslate actual traits of observable reality, then morph it through trauma & experience and thus fabricate a narrative in creative or multi-dimensional fashion aka media fiction aka FICTION.*

TL;DR Fiction comes from the thing that chibi claims it doesn't effect, but somehow despite it directly/indirectly (not interchangeable btw, not all fantasy is created equal) deriving from reality, despite fiction having objective benefits to many people (which he would cosign in a heartbeat) but at the VERY SAME TIME it does NOT affect reality negatively.*

Convenient isn't it? Age of consent isn't the hill to die on, now he's on his "fiction" talking point, every balls to the wall stance this guy claims to stand for, he always defeats himself.

Because that's not how that works.

Fiction is very much married to reality as the state of wetness is correlated with liquid. And he's some weeb outsider from the west that likely doesn't know the first thing about Japanese culture. The kicker is, he's creating & enabling more young minds to be just like him, hence "Chibitz" or Cheezits or whatever the fuck he creepily calls these cats. That's really the worst part, not his fall, but he's dragging others with him. Brotha is quickly approach if not arguably has already crossed the threshold of a lolcow. And all he had to do was just divorce Anime from the pedestal he put it on, that simple stipulation would've prevented most of this shit he's on, not all, not even the worst of his lore, but it would've lessened most of it. I pity this guy, if someone made a sped up 60 second montage of his gradual corrosion over the years, it'd be a tragedy in motion. Could he change? Sure, but he has zero incentive to do so. That's what destroys a lot of young men & women today, social media makes it too easy to surround yourself with enablement. ZERO incentive to change.

/re ""There are ICE agents dragging pregnant women in Minneapolis--" | The importance of doing your research

"There are ICE agents dragging pregnant women in Minneapolis. They shot a  praying pastor with a pepper ball in Chicago. You are apparently living the fantasy world."

Re: 

The pastor situation 100%. He asserted it was multiple times he got shot (non-lethal bullets, still excessive).

https://www.ucc.org/ucc-pastor-shot-by-federal-agents-with-pepper-round-speaks-about-standing-on-the-side-of-love/#:~:text=Bautista%20is%20not%20the%20first,multiple%20times%20with%20pepper%20balls.

The disabled woman "Aliya Rahman" scenario is messier.

*Apparently (per her testimony) has TBI and Autism🚨 and was not pregnant.*🚨  On her way to appointment (Hennepin County Traumatic Brain Injury Center.), she froze when ordered to move her car by several agents & leave the vehicle, which she couldn't, needed a cane. 

Aliya was genuinely at the wrong place, wrong time, she wasn't obstructing on purpose.

And thus was detained because she didn't comply-- because she froze, because of her condition.

*Where ICE went wrong was the excessive force after she asked for her cane & stated she was disabled, and by omission of evidence & her own testimony, she was not pregnant. 

She didn't testify as such, and her legal team did not prove as such. *

She needed a cane to walk, ICE did not provide, they confiscated it. Thats bad enough. Their immediate  agenda was getting out of the situation via rapid-carry technique, which dragging is standard practice, it looks bad because of the context. 

But military do the exact same to the injured when a shoulder carry is too time consuming in a high stakes situation. Dragging her was their method of choice of rapid-carry technique/extraction, but carrying her would've been more humane than dragging dead weigh. Whether it was faster is up to the beholder, I personally think carrying over the shoulder is faster.

 

The conduct was excessive, but even if a lie or untruth, if you're being told the detainee is pregnant allegedly & she's verbalizing for a cane. You need to breathe deep & think.

However, also understand how yells & screams can blend into background noise in the field unless it's coming from allies you subconsciously whitelisted---- however if she's repeatedly asking for her cane & you proceed to drag instead of hoist or lift or carry, thats neglect. 

And while she was granted hospital care, that was only AFTER she lost consciousness; her overall treatment was unacceptable.

Neither of these sources i cite mention a pregnancy, it's a lie. We shouldn't repeat things without sources or drop it on public forums without looking it up first. Then proceed to receive likes for partial misinformation, confidently wrong.

At worst you can incriminate the fact that her being pregnant was possible & the agents didn't care and kneeled on her anyway; assuming they registered the shouts. 

*But in the grand scheme, this is why obstruction & "protesting" should not be conflated as the same thing. 

Getting in the way of federal officers then playing victim when actions have consequences have set a dangerous precedent for everyone, including the ICE Agents; to where a woman was accidentally in the way on her way to an appointment but the agents were in bulldog mode because they're used to people being in the goddamn way constantly. 

Because everyone wants to be a superhero in lack of actual priorities in their own boring lives that could use that same exact energy.* 

When if these feddies were allowed to do the operation and leave, they would literally be gone faster. That's the reality.

This is precisely why people need to stay in their place, keep your damn cars parked where they're supposed to be, stay out the damn street, & just record, picket, say your piece, posture on Blue Sky or Twitter that you're changing the world.  

TL;DR _The pregnant woman situation did not involve a pregnant woman but it was still excessive; respectfully, this is why research is important._ 🚨

Minnesota woman ICE pulled from car during arrest files claim against feds: https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/aliya-rahman-ice-arrest-claim/#:~:text=On%20Thursday%2C%20the%20MacArthur%20Justice,damages%20caused%20by%20federal%20employees.

Minnesota woman dragged from car by ICE agents gives testimony in DC: 

https://womensagenda.com.au/politics/world/minnesota-woman-dragged-from-car-by-ice-agents-gives-testimony-in-dc/#:~:text=Rahman%2C%20of%20what%20happened%20to,president%20Donald%20Trump's%20immigration%20crackdown."

/re "Ya Boi Zack has his own RULES that Destroyed his channel-" | "Who Cares?" | What happened to Ya Boi Zack?

"I don't agree with everything he says, but he's the sharpest, funniest, most insightful YouTuber out there. He was dead on with the woke stuff years ago, and he's right about the birthday party clowns for the most part. Yeah, he should stop rationalizing his own lateness, but he's right that I would rather have quality than a crap book that's "on time." And who cares that he's losing subscribers??? The channels that consistently grow are all pandering, crap factories that just hit all the same cynical beats designed to feed the algorithm. And who cares that he's losing subscribers??? The channels that consistently grow are all pandering, crap factories that just hit all the same cynical beats designed to feed the algorithm.
And who cares that he's losing subscribers??? The channels that consistently grow are all pandering, crap factories that just hit all the same cynical beats designed to feed the algorithm."

Mixed bag. 

Him losing subs actually has legitimate implications, the main one i'm noticing is his unhealthy obsession with drinker, nerdrotic & the like. Like a bitter ex-girlfriend levels of resentment. 

Which is actually playing the algorithm game anyway, controversy & hate videos is sloptubing. 

Because he's leaning into an audience that agrees with him simultaneously as people are leaving in greater numbers (hence how ppl are noticing the dip). Thus that "Haha 50yr old manbaby, anti-wokes R stoopid  dur" talking point & the comments just echoing what he says Aka he's a pandering crap factory. Just with less effort & production value.

So perhaps he's just a shite youtuber, maybe it's something else.  

More importantly, *Zack used to be that rebel, he used to be special, but now he's dancing the fine line of a Lolcow.*

And maybe.....25%/ aka a quarter of his nitpicks are valid. Like Nerdrotic's idiotic tweet about Karen being infront of Matt in a still shot from Daredevil Born Again, stupid, Zack was on point.

_Otherwise, if you're confident in what you say, then how many times do you need to say the same thing? That goes for them and Zack._ (And that's coming from me, the irony isn't lost.)

 I'm subbed after 6+ years and STILL subbed just because I'm entertained by his downward spiral. For me it's more noticeable, because I sat on his channel for 3+ years came back and dude is on something different, something slightly off. 

If it weren't for his rambling I wouldn't have ever watched drinker or nerdrotic, Im not subbing to them permanently but broadly thats partly why he's losing subs. 

I repeat::::::: I actively AVOIDED those guys for years, him raving about them constantly got me curious, im not one of those ppl that just takes your word for it, I scope it out. 

And what I heard from them directly DID NOT align with his rhetoric, at least not enough to warrant the vitriol he possesses. He doesn't bring attention to when they praise something, he highlights to his audience  only the side of the party clowns he wants to pretend is the only canon event that exists of those people. 

And that's not how that works, that's where he's getting this all wrong. ZERO NUANCE.

TL;DR he's like an anti-woke NPC going off an article's title for 30 minutes but for him, he's going off a thumbnail or title for 20minutes and given he's Zack with all his turtles pace verbal eccentricities, a 3 minute statement will indeed be 20- 30 minutes.

It's only now in 2026 that I typed his channel in google to confirm if I'm hallucinating this dude's derailment arc only to find out people 3 years+ prior have noticed the same thing I did. Which is what I didn't want to see.

I couldn't believe it,  Reddit posts and everything. Zack used to be that guy--- Underground comics gem, but now he's here, and everyone's asking "what happened?" 

Losing subs is very VERY relevant. That rabbit hole is how I found this video. Full circle. This bloat comment of mine is mapping out just one reason he lost subs, just one. Cause he almost lost mine, but I'm curious as to where he veers off to next, he could clean it up over a week and he could bounce back without compromising himself. Imagine the glowup, one of the best character arcs, but he has to want it.

Problem is if he thinks he's the "good guy" & his internal narrative is "Me (Zack) vs Them (Anti Wokes)" then he's really just re-packaging Anti-woke vs Wokes. Othering.

Everyone's got an "Other" that they think it's their job to fight, where Zack goes wrong is not realizing his participation in it or he does, hence the obsession. Creating enemies where none exist, aka purpose, aka content, aka feeding algorithm.

Losing subs is very VERY relevant. That rabbit hole is how I found this video. Full circle.

This bloat comment of mine is mapping out  just one reason he lost subs,  just one. Cause he almost lost mine, but I'm curious as to where he veers off to next.

So  "who cares" is just  deflection, it's more about "why?" it's not like he takes 5 year breaks. 

So if he's still here and losing subs, there's a reason. 

Otherwise regarding the pandering crap factories--- cynical beats, better editing, longer videos for viewer retention, organized playlists, articles/tv clips cited/got receipts, better energy; memes, doesn't take them 20 minutes to get through a damn sentence,  bringing up cultural staple moments in entertainment history I never knew existed, they're consistent, i don't agree with everything they say either but they're also not wrong on a lot of beats regarding the cultural corrosion etc. etc. etc.

I don't know everything about these dudes, they're not my internet uncs, their content i turn on and press ESC on when I got better shit to do. So if they're on some crazy shit Zack & only Zack knows about, then he needs to go to Youtube Execs or the authorities; otherwise he needs to calm down.

Because I repeat, if it weren't for ZACK acting like a crazy ex-wife, I wouldn't have ever watched those other guys.  

Waaaay more to it than just anti-wokes being cynics and Zack is the valiant Anti Anti-woke here to save us all; Just like there's more to Zack's videos than just him belaboring points, getting lost mid-thought, filibuster and coughing in our damn ears.