Women aren't delicate, not naturally.
But the modern woman as of 1990 to 2030: as a concept is built too fragile and brittle to be the connective tissue that is a "matriarch", the backbone of the "community" organism and the family.
The the civilizational pillar of an entity that feminism devalues for a CEO fetish, it's like the modern woman was designed to be a hyper-competent weaklink. Cause in theory, modern should mean upgrade, not factory flaw or Bugged Windows Update.
Too many modern women are incapable of being matriarchs because the work as a:
- single
- or as a mother
- or as a wife & mother--
- any work that demands too much, is a psychological crisis.
Because what she (in the video) is talking about is burnout, but mind you: if he didn't communicate & involve her in the decision making, that would also be undervaluing her opinion, and neglecting her from what gets done.
I won't obfuscate and say trash in the can one time made her go nutty, I'm sure it was recurring enough to build up her frustration; but the problem isn't her being frustrated at all, ever.
Not even 1950s housewives had that plastic smiley face 24/7, women are allowed to be frustrated without it being a "Feminism bad" video essay.
But the sheer lack of retrospect of how small, minute, and petty the situation is-- and her running to social media (women treating the internet like a therapist) to talk about her "amazing" point average husband: That specifically is telling.
That is where she shows her quality as a woman, and ironically: all for the world to see. That's the impulse of a teenage girl.
Single women talk about this too (burnout), so this isn't about marriage, this is about the caliber of woman that girls are cultivated to become:
Which despite feminism & woman worship culture's effort--- what you're curating isn't a leader, but a consumer & part-time laborer who doesn't want to work too hard, and will quit at the drop of a hat.
She even admits that the guy is amazing-- so the amount of work women with her mindset perceive as disproportionate:
- they take it as a threat to their agency, they sit in proverbial corner & stew on their brewing self-agitation, feeling powerless and thus seeding resentment when to claim agency is to just open her mouth and speak to him. Especially if he's as allegedly communicative as she describes.
This is the same self-torturing misery Scott Carey put his own dumbass through the entire book of The Incredible Shrinking Man 1956; see most people read it and think "the limits of Masculinity", "Fragility of Masculinity", "Critique of Masculinity". When Scott's fragility, and seeding resentment at a perceived scoreboard imbalance, & externalizing it on everyone around him, pushing people away, burning himself out instead of taking accountability.
Is more accurately representing Post-2000 Modern women's own fragility than anything patriarchal.
- And to run to social media to hunt for someone to tell them they're in they're in the right. (Buzzfeed, Reddit etc.)
Egalitarianism, Feminism, & transactional relationships destroyed the quality of women.
Not just one of those is at fault, none of them are at fault as a single thing (because they all serve a constructive purpose in their own right but it has to be in combination to something else that actually produces something.
- *Traditional Nuclear unit,
- Patriarchal resources,
- mutual anchoring/Co-dependency/maturity/duty),
but the specific combination of all 3 (without accountability btw) is why too many women are so inept at co-habitation.
Mind you, what he's doing disproportionately that she isn't paying back on doesn't register to her mind. This is the problem with "mankeeping", these labels academia provide women is under the pretense, that a woman's best interest is the actual relationship. That's why when "keeping" is brought up, Lesbians are nowhere near the discussion. The men have to be the scapegoat and beaten into the ground.
There can't ever be a moral for everyone to learn from, someone has to be made an example of.
- Her only reality is her immediate inconvenience of being involved in what goes on in their house repeatedly, think about how backwards that is.
- If she wasn't the project manager but instead a spectator because he had it down, presumably she would feel left out or have less agency in her own house because he insists on doing everything, then he'd be a control freak.
- And you know 100% that's how this would be spun.
She's as involved as her foremothers were, they could handle it (for better & for worse, with less resources, less opportunities; no reddit to cry to, no tiktoks) and despite having every advantage they didn't have--- she's complaining to the world that she has to take out trash or give the man a layout of the children's lunch; the problem is being an adult consecutively and inconveniently.
I 100% do not blame her, you know why?
Zero stamina or endurance, that's not a birthed trait, but a curated outcome.
This is what many of are molded to become, a nerfed human being. Dead weight with scoreboards in their heads; making themselves miserable with paranoia that they're being slighted or de-valued or someone's out to get them. Aka Scott Carey.
- A lot of women have valid grievances with their partners, normal orientation or lesbian, but the common thread with "mankeeping" is NOT a man, it's a woman terrorizing herself with her own subjective scoreboard. Aka Scott Carey.
- And at worse: incompetence as a partner. Worst? Inability to even be an adult without self-destructing.
I hold her accountable for being a child about this, but I don't blame her for acting on it; the country she lives in won't hold her accountable, social media will likely vindicate her one-sided report or just unleash vitriol that will only reinforce her bias. Either way, she will be validated and learn nothing & continue to be an American Modern Woman.
Which is not a label of "Peak Woman in Human History" but somehow a derogatory term, not in the media of course but in the spaces that matter: the everyday person.
What does a "modern woman" even mean? A Success story or a jumbled mess, or a mascot that academia manipulates with flattery, one mansult at a time.
Because why was she designed to NOT be a functional wife & mother and know how to voice her own exhaustion TO THE MAN she's talking about vs venting to strangers on social media like a disgruntled teenager about the guy behind his back.
This is the model of woman girls are reduced to, less than half of their power, barely a quarter. And yet your nations media has the word "empowerment" in their mouths.
It's always glorifying the career, the slave of wages, the feminist ideal--- and not the mother, the matriarch, the glue that keeps civilization sane. That part won't get empowered, and when it does? A man is often removed from the picture. #ProudSingleMom
Society is trying to kill itself. CEO's, GirlBosses & BadBitches aren't going step up when Civilization collapses and there's no feminism to re-build from the ashes.
Feminism is the luxury movement AFTER the men get civilization to a certain point, women don't act like this before that fact. And the women before that turningpoint, they had less to work with and kept their worlds intact anyway.
The women who get it done, don't complain to social media; they walk away from the problem when there's no solution, they get advice from mama or a mentor or a friend who's managed it; or they communicate to the spouse to resolve the matter or (god forbid) fix the issue in themselves like functional adults.
This is the outcome of egalitarian/ transactional feminist progress in this specific context; the modern woman, career fortified & politically active to her own detriment and destruction: a beautiful castle of glass, crumbling under her own weight, whether married or single, either way; she either cracks and or crumbles.
Blame/ hold responsible the people who built the castle. Hold accountable the movements selling women a dream they can't realistically fulfill.
