I love this back & forth between them when Tucker started dissenting, ppl say (ppl meaning conservatives too ngl) Tucker didn't push back on Nick. Yes tf he did, he just wasn't confrontational, he did it with class, calmly. Big brother energy without Little Broing Nick, respectful.
This is an important caveat whenever men go "off" on women or perceived double standards, be it behavioral, social, professional, or systemic 3:00 the only reason why women might do it or abuse the privilege is they're allowed to do it and not only enabled but men are part of the issue enabling. Thus they abuse it. Doesn't alleviate women choosing to do it, but it's an important caveat to not hold it against them for exploiting social leeway and cheat codes made available in the first place. Because the cheat codes have had & exploit (physical exploitations & abuse, status) they do so too at women's expense. Goes both ways, always.π§
And "happy wife happy life" is bullshit, it's the mantra of a slave, a keeper: Womankeeping.
- You're the partner, protector: You serve her needs, not her servant: just as she does for you. If yer not both happy or more importantly: if the consideration of happiness runs more than the other person gives a damn, there's no relationship.
- That slogan is just code for idol worship which just enables low quality women thinking being vain & selfish is natural, it's what it's always been: Woman worship.
Just like Nick said, it's a "pedestal", you can want her to be happy, you can make her a priority without disregarding yourself. Women can make men happy without service being an existential attack on modern rigid norms of perceived "autonomy".¯\_(γ)_/¯
- And no, women are not complex: double meanings, Holding subtext back is a maturity problem.
- Communicative incompetence even, that's a damn teenager. Stop enabling this crap as "girls being girls". It's not cute, and it's not attractive nor inevitable, it's a conscious tactic to get the man to give a crap, or get his attention. The same type of vehicle some women use through arguments, questions, or celebration. It's just a social vehicle.
Nick is 1000% correct, this complexity myth is just more enabling. If your woman is acting like a damn riddle, encourage her to communicate more effectively: She'll be more satisfied by not making her life more miserable because you didn't decode her brainteaser of the week because of something you did or didn't say on a Thursday 7 years ago.
- Women are encouraged to self-actualize & their actual gods are "agency", "Independence" & the Holy spirit: "Autonomy" = Me me me, which is fine, find yourself but don't get lost in yourself. Because with that much self worship the ONLY destiny suited for you is isolation.
Meanwhile the needs of everyone else in their orbit is thrown into a black hole, because if they do even a pinch too much, many burnout or some crap.
- Because that mindset is not fit of a mother or a wife or a pillar of a family or community, its not resembling anything of a woman a Nation desperately needs. Thats a product of the times, a member of society but not a pillar of stability or a source of any strength, a disposable-- which is why "self" is pushed--
- an isolated member is more disposable, a narcissist is easier to isolate-- #WARFARE:
- all to dillute less quality women being raised that will pose a threat to the same system feeding women terms like "mankeeping". The entire point is to groom customers of the propaganda system that needs women as a living, breathing ammunition to the fakeass "gender war" to somehow think being educated equals no family is the natural outcome, when its really about having a funky attitude no one wants to deal with.
- A woman that takes accountability cant be manipulated with a scapegoat (aka men as the villain of the week again), because owning your mistakes as a person or as a group is the ultimate agency no hashtag, academia article, or gender studies major can give you- ever.
- A woman that gives while knowing her worth enough to avoid exploitation, boundaries- isnt a woman thats transactional, thats a woman who labors, gauges output of labor thus avoids burnout and mentored by women to know the differnce vs complaining that adulthood is inconvenient because labors and thus inconvenience & labora are a womens issue when its not.
- That kind of a woman is a threat because she fights injustice, isnt looking for a scapegoat. Won't accept one, thus immune to one. That is as much a threat as a man who won't apologize for telling the truth, or man enough to admit when wrong without allowing it to bruise his masculinity. Fail with grace, concede with class. A brutally undervalued lesson boys need to be proper husbands and girls learn the same thing through accountability.
There's a lot of women out here holding it down, I see it everyday but a too many of us are using "Self-preservation" to mask fragility and adulting skill issues.
Underdeveloped ENDURANCE skill issue.
Men are told to step up, do more and then when her priority is herself, his priority is also her, what happens to him? No one gives a crap, that's NOT the design of God, Quantum moderator or nature, brotha Tucker.
She submits to him in the first place to serve his needs as priority out of respect and he makes her the priority because he values her as his honor: That doesn't translate to "Happy wife, Happy life." that translates to a perpetual system of give & takes = " We win." That's the design, that's how it works.
We're conflating male's natural proclivity for the well being of women with making women the only priority when One person doesn't make a relationship of TWO people. This is where both left & right wings get it wrong doing the same thing but having different values while making the same mistakes.
- Women dont belong in the kitchen, they belong where Adams rib was, right next to men. Adams rib wasnt attached to his asscheeks, thus not behind him. Right NEXT to him. If religious ppl like to use the book so much there's your lore accurate parallel.
- One person being happy is not everyone being happy, women's progress in society is not everyone winning. Because if it doesn't work for you, if her mankeeping you is a problem, then it doesn't work at all even if she's benefitting instead at the cost of his womankeeping.
- Reciprocity is not what women say it is,π¨π¨π¨ I can't make that anymore clear.
- It's give and take on both ends of the spectrum, and no it's not about keeping score, because even Lesbians can't manage an algorithmic 50/50, by probability: it is impossible. It's solely about giving a shit which can exceed to 70/70 easily. This is what I meant by a woman that evolved past transactional mindaet paranoia, and it is 100% paranoia. So much how people ruin what they have is what they tell themselves they deserve because they either overrate their labor or they only value labors they see directly in front of them-- and dont even realize the sacrifices made that they'll never know about but are venting on reddit to strangers about how they deserve better:
Which maps out how Social Media was a double edged sword and double shot of poison into the veins of humanity. It was a mistake.
So if men care about women's happiness more than women care in reverse? Or at least that's the perception?
Or emotionally dense men that don't know how to initiate an emotional/social bonding moment with women without wives having to ask to talk every single time? (And years into a marriage, it can get demoralizing for women)
You're not raising women or men, you have a generation of oblivious parasites that are harmless but too self-centered.
Either you're in a RELAT+ionship or you're keeping someone's daughter or son-- for little to nothing for free.
Because the giving back is the payment, you're not getting that? Then It's for free fellas. Burnout doesn't just happen to women, there's a reason why men drop sooner than women, and it has as much to do with lack of support or consideration as it does diet & habits.
It's about the team----Period (!) or not at all.
It's that simple.
"Happy US, or it's BOGUS." ππ now put that shit on a t-shirt.♂♀
14:18 "-by serving each other" EXACTLY Tucker.✅ So logically If you're serving each other in the first place, that's the intended system, so naturally "happy wife, happy life" logically doesn't fit into that. Precisely my point.
