So the movie about a villain having a happy ending possesses an antagonist anyway, an antagonist who's most prominent described traits is she's mean & actively obsessed with princes, ie. males. EGASP! that little witch.
One of the step sisters were already humanized in Cinderella II: Dreams Come True, quite sweetly in fact. We gonna pretend that better handled subversion never happened?! Lol!
We've been over this lol, kinda late to the party netflix
RECAP:
netflix steps pov: Antagonists are misunderstood* ✅
also steps pov: Oh the antagonist of a movie about antagonists being misunderstood? -- has an antagonist anyway🚨
- did she "Curse a child with black magic?"
- "attacked a kingdom?"
- "attempted genocide"?Oh no no, much worse! ----
She's obsessed with boys. #subtle😱📉🍼
Dear girls, don't be like the villain, liking boys is harmful to your agency, said the blatant overtone of the trope.
The west's most prominent fetish is *losing on purpose, starts with those signals and narratives.
So making villains fat, ugly & combined with female = a harmful association according to pearl clutchers, but the protagonist being self-actualized VS the female villain liking boys, being comfortable in her sexuality (with males specifically) or maybe mean because she obsesses over boys instead of FOCUSING on herSELF (self worship, worship the self, ideological narcissism)
TL;DR AGENCY+Liking boys (natural female human desire) can't exist in the same dimension??-----that isn't a DAMAGING signal?
That's not problematic ? Lmfao.
And you wonder why everyone's confused, opting out, running away, retreating, fighting, and giving up. Your messages are beyond mixed, from the kids movies to your songs, to your headlines specifically tailored to condition grownass women.
It's not the implication, it's the blatant narrative.
POV: Nevermind if the demon eats literal babies, the demon in fact was the victim the entire time ya'll. 😂
No comments:
Post a Comment