2:30 thats part of the issue; it's true in life that a man doesn't "try to make efforts" to get a woman to submit to his leadership or authority-- It's something she gives by choice. It is not something he asks/ takes/or has to make an "effort" to make her do. It's not his place to milk submission out of her. Submission is something she gives, and if she doesn't feel he's worthy or? The more likely scenario is she lives in a culture that drilled into her that submission of safety or any kind of humbling herself is a threat to her agency. Which guarantees martial success is lessened.
Thus she lives an existence where she never defers submission or defers burden to any man, and eventually reaches burnout or frustration---
if you're dealing with a woman who thinks submission is defeating her autonomy then you're not dealing with a woman; you're entertaining a career-teenager, that was groomed to be single forever, child of faux-feminism.
Women didn't fail, Modernity failed women.
Otherwise it's not the man's job to make an effort to make her submit, that's half the problem right there.
Women think submission is surrender, fallaciously confusing grace with being invisible, too insecure to realize a matriarch's submission is indication of agency. A slave doesn't submit, they surrender; ask anyone that's tapped out on a sparring mat, submission is a choice.
And too many men think authority & leadership is a monarchy and a woman's submission is her falling in line, her being managable or >docile<, when that's not submission. In fact docility might be also what women think submission is hence the intimidation of submitting.
Rest your minds, submission doesn't entail being docile & fetching his slippers.
Submission is something he earns through trust & integrity, not just being "the man" in the dynamic as an entitlement.
We're missing the plot on both sides.
No comments:
Post a Comment