2:30 thats part of the issue; it's true in life that a man doesn't "try to make efforts" to get a woman to submit to his leadership or authority-- It's something she gives by choice.
It is not something he asks/ takes/or has to make an "effort" to make her do. It's not his place to milk submission out of her.
Submission is something she gives, and if she doesn't feel he's worthy or? The more likely scenario is she lives in a culture that drilled into her that submission of safety or any kind of humbling herself is a threat to her agency. Which guarantees martial success is lessened or basic human connection is impossible. (a much more likely candidate to drop birthrates than economics and education, because cultural sociological incompetence is leagues more active than the latter)
Thus she lives an existence where she never defers submission or defers burden to any man, and eventually reaches burnout, resentment or frustration---
if you're dealing with a woman who thinks submission is defeating her autonomy then you're not dealing with a woman; you're entertaining a career-teenager that was groomed to be single forever, child of faux-feminism.
Women didn't fail, Modernity failed women. Egalitarianism works when applied to Traditional foundations, not the other way around.
Otherwise it's not the man's job to make an effort to make her submit, that's half the problem right there. It's not his place.
Women think submission is surrender, fallaciously confusing grace with being invisible, too insecure to realize a matriarch's submission is indication of agency and strength. A slave doesn't submit, they surrender or subservient; ask anyone that's tapped out on a sparring mat, submission is a choice.
And too many men think authority & leadership is a monarchy and a woman's submission is her falling in line, her being manageable or >docile<, when that's not submission. In fact docility might be also what women think submission is hence the intimidation of submitting.
Rest your minds, submission doesn't entail being subservient & fetching his slippers and if you got a man worth a damn, why not? Can't expect to maintain anything while serving no one but yourselves. You were groomed to be single, isolated and lonely forever. You were lied to.
Submission is something he earns through trust & integrity, fetched slippers is a testament of earned position-- not just being "the man" in the dynamic as an entitlement.
Same goes for the woman, you don't get put first just for being "the woman"; it's an entitlement as a WIFE, 100%, but to even get that far is something you should be earning beyond just being "in love".
We're missing the plot on both sides. Too much talking past each other & not enough communication, and yet everybody wants something.
It's not sustainable, and it hasn't been. Wake the fuck up.
Submission is a choice of acknowledgment of the man as the head of the situation, not the boss but the authority. that's no more slavery than it is A man's part to prioritize her wellbeing over his own, which technically puts her above him anyway while he has the primary authority.
But ppl rarely mention that caveat
Too many people confuse "submission"️ with "surrender"️ when they're not the same thing.
This is why too many chicks out here thinking submission is a threat to their "agency"-- Meanwhile, they want men to act like men. But they don't wanna respect the man's authority which is part of the deal.
modernity got yall overthinking everything until you dont know how to do any of it.
if she doesnt see him worthy to submit to, she doesnt respect him. *If she thinks submission is a threat & never does so? Thats why her ass is still single.* And if his manhood has been redefined so many times by fem lens experts, he doesnt know how to be worthy of that submission or thinks having to do so is simpery-- thats why his ass is single
Common thread: Me me me me, "Im the main character"
This is like redpill bros thinking a mans devotion to a woman is weakness, when thats literally a mans submission to the wife, thats part of masculinity. You expect her service but you aint gotta give an inch.
Modernity has played its members like a childrens game. Thats why your birthrates are shot, the fundamentals are all wrong.
It's not like there's some unspoken rule that after she submits, she can't voice her opinion ever and has to shut up indefinitely. Or submission is something that he takes from her versus something that she gifts by choice, because he earned it.
Yall just just create worldviews off of how it sounds.
Its not about her being a robot, its about how she sees you in the first place.
Progress did a number on Americans.
But in principle I agree with LTG, I dont want a servant neither.
