soc-commie systems redistributes resources because it produces & builds nothing and maintains even less than that; Socialism & equity mechanisms works best as programs under capitalism & meritocracy. Why? Same reasons why movements like Feminism work best when under patriarchal systems that provides them capital & resources to even use for their goals.
Those resources don't just come out of thin air. Capitalism atrophies but it produces, competition drives the machine Vs socialism, like matriarchy is a connective glue but consumes itself into implosion.
Capitalism very scarcely works on it's own because it drains yet produces to supplant the drain. But neither matriarchy or socialism are designed to run the program perpetually, at least not on the level of macro-society. Which is why they don't pioneer U.S.A's--- that equity & socialism shit shows up AFTER the work is done, funny how that works, right?
Only small scale ecosystems is where that equity schtick works best, matriarchy is what keeps communities together; it doesn't build empires.
Roles & norms exist for a reason. And that rings true even if their rigidity intimidates people.
The declines didn't start until people got cocky & started challenging and abolishing everything. Yet the new norms that causes supposed "loneliness epidemics" & women's "burnout", the very egalitarian/ equitable system that does NOT work by itself (like socialism) THOSE norms don't get challenged.
Matriarchy is optimized under patriarchy. The "everyone matters", everyone's a winner, that very maternal concept of "equity" & "collectivism", that feelings oriented ideal sounds best on paper until it has to prove it's worth.
Right up until it runs out of the resources the patriarchal/capitalist/ the production based system made available in the first place. Including the very country capitalism made possible in the first place.
The socialism, like matriarchy, like egalitarianism are patchworks to compensate capitalist/patriarchal oversight. No more, no less.
This is precisely why rich American socialists stay over there with the silver spoon in their mouths instead of going to the socialist countries that's doing what they want already. They stay their asses right there in America because they like the idea of being rebels simultaneously as patriarchy feeds them.
One redistributes and disseminates resources, the other produces and actually builds something. You don't have to choose one or the other, socialist programs already exist (Gov. Funded food assist, EBT, child support etc. Tax funded programs, that- in spirit: welfare programs do lean on collective resource pooling, which emulates socialist mechanisms.
["But when the distribution mechanisms try to become the engine—when a macro-society tries to run purely on "everyone's a winner," equity, and feelings-oriented ideals—it begins to consume the stored capital."]
Getting rid of patriarchy is not the new frontier western people think it is, when all you've known your entire privileged lives is patriarchy's provision. It's not worth it.
No comments:
Post a Comment