Still The Most Shocking Second A Day (#SaveTheChildren by not bringing children into hell)

could save the children by not bringing babies into poverty in the first place and expecting other people to carry you. by manipulating them in advertisements when the kids are suffering because you had nothing better to do. but nobody's tryna have that conversation. Some women have no reproductive rights, many get forced upon but most already know they live in hell on Earth. can barely feed yourselves and yet you propagate anyway, so saving the children wasn't enough of an ideal to not have children that will exist to suffer, creating more victims of a problem you know exists. But nobody is tryna have that conversation. You have money to make ads to emotional appeal people to "save children" you could save by not bringing them into bad situations. Or use the money spent to make the ad & the ad revenue the companies take for themselves, to instead feed the kids, but nobody's tryna have that conversation.

 Yall need to stop eating this up and ignoring the damning realities because “feels”.

So we can comment our profound statements on “war bad/Ukraine/Palestine, bla bla bla” , fact is, you’re not pointing out the shit that matters-- Why are these idiots birthing babies into Hell?

cause at the end of the day, most turn the video off, it’s not our problem anymore and we resume said normal little lives.

The desperate, dumb, poor, and stupid have the most time on their hands to bump hips, but #SaveTheChildren wasn’t enough to not have them, to not bring them into diseased environment where flies & parasites live in their skin or dirty water is all they have to drink. 

#SaveTheChildren didn’t mean anything to the people having the damn kids. 

Same goes for low wage living in section 8, up to their necks in violence & dysfunction but got 5 kids.

And why aren't we talking about that as much as we are pouring our hearts out for children living in hell and not looking at the people who brought them to hell knowing they live in hell. Nobody's having that conversation. People are too damn easy to control, get you emotional and stuck in tunnel vision, and ignoring the retrospect factors.

Way too easy.

Order A Man To Hand His Child Over To The State? Not While I’m His Captain

being a parent doesn't mean you have the best interest for children, sometimes the worst policies regarding children come from parents. The ego & selfishness to spawn a child for no one's sake but your own doesn't give you authority to make laws regarding children & single people have no say-- As if your reasons to even have a baby were so noble to begin with. "You don't have a child, I do" is not the flex people think it is. It's a poor attempt to shut someone down with the same energy you tapped into to decide have the baby in the first place: Ego, ego, thy name is Ego. People really need to check themselves. Children are not a social status for your image nor a token of accomplishment for your fragile sense of existential worth because you couldn't actually achieve a legacy in life through work. They are the casualties of our passing "wants" & materialism mentality. And the "State" reaps the benefits of the spawning cattle, ready to put the baby through every red-tape process, system and eventually wring them dry of their life-clock in the workforce. Gov. will start dictating what you say, what you see, and they will come for your kids. Not a fan of Star Trek, but this shit was ahead of it's time.

2:12 Boom, that's what most people are missing. This obligatory sense of duty, that's what's missing from a lot of people calling themselves parents. People do it just because they can, just because they want a new toy called a "baby" to spice things up, and the kid just becomes part of the routine. The missing element is duty, and necessity.

YouTube Needs To Remove Family Channels...

At the end of the day, people only have children to serve their own selfish egos.

Using them for profit, or a means to glue your marriage, impress your friends, or to please your parents, or to make your damn self feel good, to feel like you have purpose, or feel like you accomplished something when you have no ACTUAL concrete accomplishments built with your own hands in life---

Either way, the child is being used for someone's selfish agenda.

The baby is the vehicle, the casualty, the tool, the means.

Just something people do because they can, that's it.

It boils down to ego, and self-centered gratification.

So Family Channels are an unnatural, dramatic devolution of that selfishness, but the selfishness to have a child for no one's sake but your own, not even the child's sake comes before what YOU want.

Family channels come from the same vein of hubris that it takes to bring a child into a life where you know you don't have anything tangible to pass down to them beyond good intentions, no real skills to teach, no legacy to inherit or some investment fund for them you started 5 years before their birth.

Nothing.

Nope, they just show up, they're cute, you got to say you have a child now & the social validation that comes with that. Likes and all, you love them sure, but that came AFTER the decision to have them, and the decision making process had nothing to what was best for the would-be child, but instead, the parents involved and their agenda.

And that's it. Ego, it boils down to ego.

No matter what, children are just forcefully spawned in for someone else's vindication, whether it be poverty, an abusive home, people that should not be parents, born in a goddamn WARZONE, born during a recession, born in an era where people know the economy is gonna tank and have kids anyway because (IQ averages are apparently dropping per generation) etc.

It's such a shitty culture. And kids caught in the middle while their parents just wing it, a lot of people treat babies with that western materialism mentality. A lot of people want to HAVE a baby, but not many talk about "raising" a child but a lot people want want want a child. Mooks.