Macrophilia: Misogyny cosplaying as Empowerment, the manhood crisis fetish.

Enter Macrophilia ie. The Manhood crisis fetish/ Agency drought fetish.

PART 1: “Empowerment fallacy”

To tackle a common defense, or ‘aka’ a common cope many use in defense of macrophilia or more so / used in desperate justification for it in lack of an actual reason: the very common, very ignorant — “Empowerment/Feminism” sales pitch.

• Take for example: The overused, done to death scenario of a woman destroying her surroundings/city, like a rabid out of control animal. A child.
• Rambling on and on about “control”, little people being “insignificant” bugs, getting aroused at terror of her victims, the artist / author eroticizing helplessness, trivializing human life.

(You know, all the things a parent wants to see in their child’s mental health. Definitely a hallmark of quality nurture/nature factors.)

Thus, In the mind of a Macrocreep (aka npc Macrophile), at least in blatant of frequency of this same done to death visual:

• A woman with “power” or advantage translates as a threat to men, to other women, children. In the desire to see a woman as an overwhelming dominating force, dethroning men as the physical apex of the human species.

According to macrophile propaganda: “Empowered” women, or a woman with inequity is a threat to civilization.

Or a woman taking advantage of inequity to have her way, even if it’s benevolent means she serves as some kind of looming grotesque deformity to surrender to, than respect.

Surrender & respect are not the same thing. You can follow the leadership of a respected woman, but “surrender” to something is whole other connotation, especially if it’s something fallacious like a false sense of safety AND it’s 100% fantasy aka delusion aka in your head. Red flag.

• That is in no way a “feminist” power fantasy of defying patriarchy, that’s toxic femininity or femininity being hijacked to resemble toxic masculinity & gynocentrism to replace patriarchy as the new author of society’s problems between men and women. Which is accurate.
• Because being a public menace is exceeding patriarchy’s problems and illustrating that simply: PATRIARCHY actually? Made advanced civilization vs empowerment for women eventually destroys it — 

That’s the narrative they push ad infinite like religious zealots.

It’s pushed so frequently, & so often having nothing to do with sex, bonding, or connection: this exceeds a fetish in conventional terms and enters the realm of an *ideology*:

Because notice it’s more about the vocabulary, the emotional impact of the giantess, the feeling her scale invokes, than it is her sexual compatibility or even her having a stake in society —

Words for example, the words, the dogma, the propaganda:

• “insignificant”
• “diminutive”
• “I’m in charge”
• “goddess”
• “like a bug”
• “tiny”
• “Insignificant compared to her” (thats a popular one, gentle, unaware or destructive, that slogan is one of the most common, usually from male tinies — no surprise there *hence castration ritual)
• “It’s MY fault” — The male usually disproportionately being blamed or blaming himself, when the woman is in the wrong/ even when the woman is the one victimizing him, unaware or intentionally. aka Zero female accountability (parallel to real life phenomenon). The man has to be in the wrong 24/7, he’s the piece of shit. And she’s justified in whatever happens to him. Misandry. — Keep in mind I rarely see female tinies saying this, the self-blame theme is almost always rigidly strict to male tinies: Hence *Male Self-Hatred fetish, bowed head, bent back, or crushed vessel beneath the heel of matriarchal authoritarianism or digested to be become a “part” of her, men are the expendable sub-human “things” women just use & discard.
• Misandrist propaganda/ Male-Self hated (IRL)
• Infantilizing, Misogyny cosplaying as empowerment (IRL)

The intent of the excuses used vs the content the people are making excuses for — are clashing.

This is neither feminist, nor empowering, nor ‘men’s desire for more female empowerment’- Which is the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard come from actual experts, so sick of seeing it.

For male & female subjects alike: It’s “overcompensation”, all of it, gentle, neutral, & aggro GTS alike. It’s compensating for something.

So why is men wanting female empowerment dumb in this context? Via a fetish that trivializes strong women by painting them as psychopathic demons or smooth brained easy to please babysitters that simply exists to be mommy?

Well simply put, when society prioritizes the well being of women, the social advancement of women, programs for women, support organizations for women, women never have to perform or do better, someone has to step for women, some system has to “support” women (aka give me money) to & for women, for women, for women, women, women: before or if EVER men get any love or attention to their social issues (unless it affects women in some way).

When a very common western narrative of women “leaving men behind”— The operative question becomes —

How are men craving female empowerment in a society that already shoves female empowerment and only empowerment for women down the throats of men?

How are they lacking or missing or thirsting for something they’re already getting assaulted with disproportionately and not receiving at the same time?

Secondly, how are men craving female empowerment in a society that expresses often: that it doesn’t give a shit about men?

Theory #1 Either it’s men using the fetish as a vehicle because women aren’t getting enough empowerment?

Or Theory #2 It’s damaged men/ & women reasonably acting out a manifested directive through repeated cultural conditioning that gynocentrism finally overstayed it’s welcome or and gynocentrism corrupted the true purpose of feminism.

•  That Toxic femininity is hurting everyone, including feminisms valid intentions, and female empowerment’s initial good intentions complicating the narrative of what a strong woman even is. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

The female empowerment excuse doesn’t hold weight, because you’ll have “shrunken woman” genre where women specifically or solely: are victims of giant women, cannibalism, sexual assault, mutilation, manslaughter, etc. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

How’s that factor into empowerment? 👁️👄👁️Nice try. Funny how they don’t mention that in their puff pieces.

But articles spouting safe, cuddly talking points like “exploring macrophilia” or “embracing” this & “accepting” that like it’s a new mathematics curriculum given to us by a god-alien race — these same people won’t mention the more pronounced aspects of the fetish that are so prevalent, they’re not part of the iconography, IT IS the iconography.

I could give one some credit if they tried to argue that the brutal, horrific, disgusting, anti-human elements are less than 2% of the fetish (but even if it were, that is still a problem) but here, in this timeline, it’s more than 60% of the substance.

• Seems dishonest to say “Understanding Macrophilia and Femdom” then be selective in what you address about it, so it’s not understanding it than it’s selling it. 

So next time, before you go running to the “Feminism” & “empowering” cope thinking that’s justifying the obsession or giving you the fuzzies that society is giving you a foothold, slow your roll:

• cause even if that scapegoat was valid as an argument, it’s still insulting & contradictory to Feminisms actual goal and really makes empowerment look pathetic. 
• A child’s equivalent to a crutch gimmick to justify female superiority — which is just another inequity, another disconnect.
• So an anti-feminist fetish glorifying inequity & suffering, is somehow feminist. 

We done redefined what Feminism & empowerment is to avoid saying: “Mental issues”. 

Two words for Two words.

“Feminism is a movement to end sexism, sexist exploitation, and oppression

clearly states that the movement is not about being anti male but the problem is sexism(females can be just a sexist as man because all of us have been socialized from birth on to accept sexism thought and action)”

— definition of feminism by bell hooks (& she is correct)

“the movement is not about being anti male — ” Macrophilia is.

And as I’ve figured out at the start of 2025 , it’s also blatantly Anti-Human.

• How so? When we’re so desperate that one has to drop the word “Feminism” as a hail mary just to justify this garbage. When the point of Feminism is eradicating Inequity, not glorifying inequity or creating a new one.
• And a lot of it is pedo-bait, doesn’t mean a macrocreep by default is a pedo but this fetish, like any hedonism is a rabbit hole to derangement. A lot of the time the city bashers are teenage girls, or actual children. Or scaling it down to fetishizing a little girl crushing an ant or something, just the most nutjob shit, & for no reason. None.  

The question becomes — do you even know what Feminism is, let alone what you’re even talking about- trying to use Feminism & Empowerment on your terms, to defend a fetish where the concept is the antithesis to what Feminism even stands for?

Think about it, I repeat: if the giant femcel is flattening a city, that obviously includes women & children too —

then what we’re really saying / what the fetishists are saying *unintentionally*: is toxic modern feminism/toxic femininity hurts men, children AND WOMEN, destabilizes the same society that provides her tampons — and?

 They’re accidentally right:

So what macrophiles are actually worshipping is women emulating toxic masculinity, because that’s the caricature of women they’re familiar with in reality, that’s what they’ve been fed. Masculine women, parodies of women being the modern woman.

Just like Hollywood’s toxic “strong independent woman” model taught them to do so, & obediently, they do what they were taught.

• Glorify the attitude & inequity that’s destroying your society from the ground up, from loneliness “epidemics” (it’s a phase, I still disagree that it’s an alleged “epidemic”) to dropping birthrates. 
• And call that “empowerment” or expression or harmless fantasy or feminist, or a “challenge” to norms because that’s working out so well for you people in America & UK lol. 

Or whatever people label it to feel better about it.

Best to think twice before trying to excuse this nonsense as a first world feminist reckoning:

• a reckoning for what? fuck if i know since women have majority of social power as is anyway, & are doing better than ever before and every death gap is dominated by men anyway🤔
• So who are really the ones in need of a damn hug?

Or men wanting female empowerment in a society that already disregards men for women’s empowerment, I repeat.

So apparently it’s neither of those.

The truth of Macro-Misogyny+Misandry+Misery+Misanthropy-philia (Quintruple M) is it’s men (yet again), appropriating women to cope with their own mental issues.

Men using a parody of women, carefully woven of their own sick creation in fantasy where they can control women.

No matter how big, or toxic or accommodating she is: Still, the males & their gaze are what’s the “author/lord” of the fantasy.

Not the Giantess, but what he wants her to be for his/their own agenda , in the fantasy— Because even a woman on twitter calling herself “Goddess…..Tiffany *for example*”, she has no power, no position of supposed “power” unless she has followers that will play along & say all the things to enable her stupidity, otherwise she’s talking to herself.

The male gaze, for the giantess, that is god. Man is god:

—all to cope with their own insecurity, lacking, brokeness or impotence here in life where they can’t control women. Nothing about this (gentle included) communicates “Adjusted”, the 100% reliance on fantasy, the unreal, the lie, the unattainable, the delusion is red flag #1.🚩

Hence, *powercontrolpowercontrolpowerpowerpower*, even in neutral & gentle context, it boils down to the same silly crap. Maladjusted.

And to parallel that narrative, one likely possesses little to no control over even their own circumstance, hence using the fantasy to escape social demands. 

Shinji Ikari Ministry, running away. 

Paradoxically it’s about control & surrender, but not surrender to her, but to what she represents. Because the fantasy wouldn’t exist if it weren’t for reality’s social basis for the emotional feedback that the macrophile gets out of it.

And of course this appropriation, this parody insults women & damages the concept of women’s empowerment or even mocks their stake in society, naturally.

• Because it’s majority self-hating men, confused people and insecure women hijacking the concept to mean what they want it to mean.
• Just like any giant in media (Susan Murphy), anime, etc. is claimed, archived, & hijacked by these addicts. Unless it’s overtly fetishy like Giant O-Jackass Sama (Giant Ojoke-Sama, shit, my bad. One more time “Giant+Ojou-sama”, there we go.)
• Despite the stories of said neutral characters having nothing to do with macrophiles. In turn, Macrophiles project, project & project on anything & everything having a giant woman in it, so she or it represents what they want it to according to their delusions & ideology. 

So much for the “giantess = empowerment” narrative. It’s just a zealot dogma.

And if they didn’t mean for it to come out that way, that’s my point.

(which I’m sure they don’t, they don’t know what it is they’re doing, these are people with a serious, serious, brutal, social virus).

• And their lack of understanding is also — exactly my point. Folk actually don’t know what the hell they’re doing but subjecting the internet to their crap as if the Internet is their personal plaything or therapist insert.

They 100% know exactly what it is they want to see to get their grippy Mc.Stiffy’s up or get their Jack in-The Box moist, but these people truly do not know what they are actually communicating, entertaining or playing with.

“larger-than-life women challenges conventional physical ideals and embodies notions of empowerment.”- collarncuffs 2024

So it’s challenging physical ideals by presenting yet another impossible physical ideal women can’t ever achieve in reality & is actually toxic? How is that better?

So what you’re glorifying is- is an unrealistic physical expectation of women. Uhhh I thought that was a bad thing?

So because it’s macrophilia, and this unspoken rule that fetishes are sacred somehow. That means unrealistic body image & rigid expectations are fine as long as it’s in the realms of fetishism?

• That’s beautiful cope, I’m genuinely impressed at the mental gymnastics. Trying so hard to sugarcoat this, to make it sound reasonable like ‘Bird watching’ or collecting comic books.
• It’s just something society is starting to acknowledge… umm, no? You are irrelevant, the trope exists, but you wanting it to represent you, is not changing the fact that the trope exist before your finger print became legal documentation, you are irrelevant. 

*The trope is not your property just because you have nothing better to do.*

And then we frame a misrepresentation of strong womanhood as a “challenge” to conventional physical ideals?

Which just means healthy physiques that men actually prefer, challenge my ass. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

•  But men aren’t allowed to have any expectations of women, so any traditional norm of women that’s challenged aka complicated, that’s a good thing.
• Perfect Example, this progression of “thicc” women getting way more love these days, is proof that body image is not as rigid as it was as per say the 80s. So it’s not like the Barbie physique is all men respond to.

Again, people are just talking just to talk, to make this fetish sound bold & brave, when it’s really toxic bullshit making women look frankly moronic.

That’s an Interesting double standard. Misusing the concept of empowerment to unintentionally slander women through a false application to what is in reality:

A misrepresentation of women, and an insult to competent femininity, strong womanhood.

• Narratives like “ alternative perspectives on beauty and femininity” (e.g collarncuffs), “alternate perspectives” what does that even mean, you hear how they try to make it sound like a new frontier?

Where this does idea come from, that complicating gender norms//standards/guidelines/parameters became the new revolutionary?

When birthrates drop, & men and women are more lonely & don’t know how to even engage as much anymore — because you fucked everything up? Thinking you knew better than a formula (while flawed & needed tweaking, however — ) it still worked.

Very manipulative semantics to provide a false sense of security by romanticizing what is frankly a very subtle, yet malicious belief system.

Not a fetish solely, but a very wicked, twisted violation misrepresenting human connection.

All to excuse trivializing womanhood. And completely assaulting & bending what a woman is to conform to an insecure, mentally deranged mind’s misconception, by force if necessary:

A brutal rape of the natural human instinct are “alternative perspectives” ergo a violation of femininity. Enter Macrophilia.

The sizegap is the point, the visual Inequity, “Inequity” (something Feminism strives to get rid of, to this day) is the entire point of the fetish.

 That’s why the two do not mix. Trying to conflate Feminism & Empowerment with Macrophilia is a hail mary. Oil andwater.

And if you need a hail mary, you don’t have an argument.

PART 2: “The Nuance”

the bar for what makes an adult gets lower & lower

🛡️Defense #1 “Generalization of Motivation: OP broadly generalizes the motivations of all macrophiles, stating the fetish is only about male self-hatred and control. This may be true for some, the motivations for any fetish are deeply personal and varied. Some may genuinely view it as harmless fantasy, a way to explore feelings of awe or admiration for strong figures, or a simple aesthetic preference.”

“strong figures”, which ties into the same empowerment fallacy already addressed. Appropriating femininity “strong” to mean “force”, which is a masculine angle, a toxic masculine angle. So it’s hijacking, fitting a round piece into a square hole and calling it a rectangle — then calling that mismatch a “challenge” to conventional norms, when the outcome is dysfunction & disorder and a painful violation.

Let me ask a very simple question:

Are women are so underwhelming —

• — insufficient that men need to blow up & parody their strength strictly within the predictable dimension of male understanding of strength which is “force”, conquest & dominance, all to fit their desire for the giant to compensate for their own possible inadequacy and insecurities? Which is what this is really about.
• The key here: Is MALE impotence overriding & redefining what FEMALE strength is for MEN. Not WOMEN.
• This is about men using a caricature to hide behind, an effigy of mommy to be strong for the subject so the subject can take a break from being an adult because (apparently) they can’t handle it, or couldn’t manage adopting a more healthy outlet that doesn’t involve psychological regression and self-erasure. Which is just toxicity as a hobby, regression, and on no planet is that something to endorse.

Because the question becomes: “What are you regressing from?”

As for “aesthetic preference”, Giant-Man for Stan Lee was an aesthetic preference. Stan Lee had a preference for that aesthetic & took the character in that direction with that power with very low probability that he was religiously “fixated” on it specifically because of a social maladaptation.

That’s the difference. Otherwise if it was just a neutral aesthetic appeal, then it wouldn’t be a fetish at that point.

That’s why “The Incredible Shrinking Man” works so well in the same vein, (like so does Attack of the 50ft Woman) it spits in the face of Macrophile narratives in every respect. Despite some perhaps trying twist even that to say the “hidden size fetishism” in the 1957 movie, there is none, it has nothing to do with you.

It has size difference In it, and that’s all you give a shit about and you NEED it to mean fetishisms — when it DOES NOT because you have a problem. Hijacking.

• The Hulk is technically a “giant”, one of the best executed ones I can think of story wise beside Optimus Prime or Shin Godzilla. Between the body horror, the psychological realms, the variations of his abilities. Hulk, the jolly green giant is a storytelling beast.

• For Nancy Archer, it was the mental breakdown, the point wasn’t the rampage, nor was she in the right, homegirl was dead by the end of the movie because of her own actions. Consequences. (the movie didn’t celebrate her being a toxic/public menace, sorry to disappoint you, normies💔), It was about her mental health & dependence issues: lack of support network, her alcoholism, her abandonment issues from her parents’ deaths when she was so young & clinging to someone dysfunctional because she needed an anchor, even if it was unhealthy.

• For Susan Murphy (the love letter to Nancy), her condition thematically was the vehicle away from unhealthy anchors. Untapped potential, self-worth narrative. The modern antithesis to Nancy’s tragedy. Susan’s a descent character.

Mecha for example, they’re literally giants but machines, what keeps them from ever getting corny, stale creative bankrupt blackholes like giantess: is the storytelling narrative surrounding them, the context, the agenda, the cultural subtext, the things they can do. The fact that they’re often a plot device of development for their pilots and the story.

What they represent is tied to the story, characters; the plot isn’t hindered by obsession, repeated, recycled dumbass cliche’s relating to insecurity and overcompensation.

And if ‘insecurity’ is the theme (“Neon Genesis Evangelion”), then in a story written worth a shit, there’s a point to that subtext beyond glorifying/worshipping/ peddling masturbatory self-indulgent propaganda of the problem actually being a good thing because: *self-destruction feels safer😩

My acknowledgement for those storytelling vehicles is the actual alleged “aesthetic preference”, actually.

So I repeat: “if it was just a neutral aesthetic appeal, then it wouldn’t be a fetish at that point.” So that counter is actually not talking about fetishists, it’s talking about people like me, the adjusted.

Otherwise, we are too comfortable with this word “fetish”, so comfortable, we tend to forget that it literally means “obsession”, unhealthy.

So the problem still remains, the basis of the theme is wanting to feel something from the visual size disparity, usually deprecative outcome.

• So It likely comes from the same place of insecurity, if not guaranteed. The gap is necessary because there’s a gap in the mind of the phile in the first place.

Macrophiles get something different from it while obsessing over the same stupid crap.

🛡️Defense #1.5 “While this may be true for some, the motivations for any fetish are deeply personal and varied. Some may genuinely view it as harmless fantasy”,

Harmless, OK —

even if, even as — the subject prefers to see it that way, or convinced themselves to rationalize it as such: Doesn’t mean it is.

If someone fantasized marrying an anime 5 yr old, that’s no more or less harmless than fantasizing a giant woman committing —

GENO-CIDE

It’s all fantasy, so who cares, right?

as for “deeply personal and varied”

I repeat: “Macrophiles get something different from it while obsessing over the same stupid crap.”

Or as I’ve noticed over the years: her size is her right to impose her will on other people to the point of harm, and violation, in the fantasy ofc —

because ejaculating to that “Might is right” narrative isn’t imprinting those harmful thoughts into your mind which leads to intrusive thoughts in broad daylight at random times of the day — which is indicative that you need to take a break or just may have a legit imbalance.

But fantasy doesn’t affect reality guys, just ask Japan 2023, everything is fine.

Dehumanizing the tiny as “bugs”, or it’s their fault for being so small & “tiny” & weak (one of my favorite of their lines, it’s so retarded it’s hilarious) and so their gruesome deaths are justified as she’s getting aroused, all of which are signs of sanity & something to encourage people install into their brain meats.

You know “It’s your fault for being so tiny”, the kind of shit I’ve never heard an actual 4 year old child say but a grownass adult projecting this shit isn’t grounds for concern.

An actual toddler is the new bar for a sane adult, because adults have lost their minds.

• Call that empowerment or a fantasy or say “not harming anyone” or “who cares?”, or it’s a “challenge”, or the contradictory of “providing a safe outlet for examining these psychological dynamics in a non-threatening context.” when the entire point is to be threatened even when she’s not trying to hurt you. Or “FEMINISM!” and that’s the best argument you have to present. Lmfao. Which Is how I know I’m onto something.

“harmless fantasy” is a predictable subjective semantics defense to get beside explaining why they’re fixated on that physicality later, how they imprinted on it in the first place isn’t relevant. A child doesn’t control what it imprints on, which is how errors & misifres happen, which is what Macrophilia is, an imprint error.

Harmless fantasy, they say. But I have yet to hear how it’s:

• morally beneficial
• evolutionary advantageous
• socially healthy
• ethically necessary
• or glorifying genocide is mentally stable
• or the visual hierarchy disconnect (size gap), the visual separation of men from women is a manifestation of something society did right in sex relations

I have yet to hear even Gemini or Grok rationalize or answer that, and Gemini is leagues more progressive & tolerant. Gemini will shut me down in a second if I’m “oversimplifying” “complex” matters or “over-generalizing”.

And even after I’ve ordered it to pick apart my points using academia/ ANYTHING it can to prove reality wrong, even Gemini had to concede in the end.

And so, to laud genocide, & constantly deprecating your own self-worth in fantasy as a pillow (agency drought), glorifying inequity, death worship, & women being physical impositions as an arousal vehicle.

I have yet to hear solid reasons or reasoning justifying endorsing this, and it not boil down to semantics and excuses.

Fantasy derives from reality, if that’s the fantasy, what happened to your reality?

Nothing but excuses.

Macrophilia is a scary “What If” or an edgy “retrospect” about the human condition.

About how a child’s mind can warp something, deform it’s makeup & damage itself without injuring itself. And the cowardice of people in authority that just ignore it because no one’s dead yet over it.

(I’ll wait until a car-crash happens before I install a stop sign.)

What does it say about the human entity, that we’ll defend something like this that is screaming red flags, but because its fantasy we’ll overlook the problematic implications of what society actually did to people, possibly broke them;

what did you actually create in reality that forced or cultivated actual human beings to indulge in something like that?

“Where did the west go wrong?”

🛡️#2 “Ignoring Non-Destructive/Non-Misogynistic Subgenres: While the text briefly mentions “Gentle GTS,” it focuses heavily on the aggressive, destructive content. It overlooks non-sexual or non-violent aspects, such as benign size difference fantasies, which might make the misogyny claim too sweeping.”

This defense I don’t hear often, oddly enough, but I expect it always. Because If I were a Macrocreep, Gentle GTS would be my first line of defense before “empowerment”.

‘POV: Ok, if your go-to assault on macrophilia is “genocide” what if she’s just a sweet giant waifu, huh?’ —imaginary macrocreep

To keep it short, Gentle isn’t safe from scrutiny either, in some ways it’s worse.

It’s just glorifying “mankeeping” & women carrying weak men until burnout. Women of modernity not dealing with Men on their level, but little ass boys that refuse to grow the hell up. Literally.

• How is being a burden to a woman, or her serving & coddling you, knowing 100% the tiny can’t give it back equally — how is that harmless, when women as is are opting out of dating right now because of emotion/social labor because men right now are regressive & burning women out because men essentially aren’t men anymore?
• Harmless? This a goddamn joke? “Just a fantasy” Is a semantics play, not an argument. It’s a deflect.

SPOILER ALERT: The visual size inequity is the subtext, gentle/unaware/city destruction/ or just a giant woman in an empty forest, whatever the fuck —

the visual inequity of the size gap is the toxicity, that is the societal separation of the sexes, because the “size-”isms in the compensation, the “giant-”isms is just a pedestal.

Why? Because the inequity is the point, and the exaggerated inequality is why they’re invested in the first place. That’s gets their stomach butterflies riled up. Just looking up her magnificence is enough to get the brain chemical all bubbly.

I repeat (again): they themselves only give a shit about a character, a moment, a 10 second clip in a random advertisement or tv show or music video from 9–17 years ago in a dream sequence because it had some giant woman doing something and they get a jolt from seeing mommy on the screen.

• They Gif it, put it on discord, booru, whatever these geeks do. Absolute fanatics, actual religious people aren’t this dialed -in their bibles. Shit is unsettling sometimes. Such is fetishism.

The Toxicity is the inequity, and the inequity is the fuck they have to give in the first place, cause if it weren’t for that character being a Giant in that one episode, they wouldn’t give a shit about the character in any other respect. The visual is the problem.

So gentle, wholesome GTS Isn’t an upgrade, it’s irrelevant as a defense nor is it the “good macrophilia” (no such thing) because it’s part of the problem, part of the toxicity.

Why do you need a woman to loom over you & babysit you?

• Why does she have to be the man AND THE WOMAN because you can’t do fuck all to do your part? (metaphorically)
• Why can’t you just step up and be what she needs?
• Why does she have to be your physical warden in order to be considered strong?
• So is a giant woman really “empowering” or did you hijack what an “empowered- woman” is to suit YOUR special needs.

(that’s what this is really about, the sociological mask, the co-opt, the appropriation of what a woman even is so now we’re actually proposing “ “alternative perspectives on beauty and femininity” UN-BELIEVABLE.)

This is why it’s an ideology, how is Giantess a perspective of alternative origin, if you didn’t believe in the narrative as an ideological imperitive? The excuses & the fetishists themselves are proving my point.

To reiterate: My argument makes itself by the rules the macrocreeps themselves abide by, this is why I kept quiet for a while.

It just pays to let people think shit is sweet & keep doing what they do. All I had to do was just sit back and wait.

TLDR. Manchildren regressing & wanting mommy, instead of stepping up to be what a woman needs, the woman is designed in the fantasy to fit a rigid norm, manipulated & controlled by them to yet again serve the selfish needs of the gaze of the male/tiny disproportionately.

Because what the tiny receives (be it death or affection, in this case of gentle — undivided attention & affection) she will never get in return from the tiny at the same volume.

So it’s promoting female burn out, and women carrying man-children through relationships. And he gets to be a comfy liability.

That combined with a macrocreeps usual derangement of her not being aware of her “power” (kill me pls) when the slightest movement makes people around her cower, much to her oblivious/innocent demeanor, so she’s unaware of her supposed “goddesshood” or what she’s capable of:

And she inadvertently bullies people into submission without meaning to & that unaware position of authority is also what gets balls all tingly apparently, ooooh the “control”, oooh the “power”.

“power”“power”“power”“control”“control”“control”

Just the most unhinged shit, you originated from the male but the fe-male was your threshold unto life —and that’s how you portray women?

Real class acts to take home to meet the parents. Clownworld man, actual clownworld.

• And I repeat, it was likely unintentional that that was the narrative in outcome when these people produce this shit, but this is why I say people don’t know what they’re playing with.
• You don’t just “explore”, “embrace” & give life to anything and everything that’s in your head, children do that.

The point of the adult is to the be the upgrade above being ignorant, impulsive, & stupid. And Social Media just gives people an adrenaline shot to take to the next level.

Apparently the new redefinition of what we think an adult is is a “Part -time grown up” lmfao.

JUST BECAUSE YOU CAN, DOES NOT MEAN YOU SHOULD #Adulting 101

🛡️Defense #3 “ — Ideology vs. Fantasy: The text elevates the fetish to an “ideology” or “social virus.” While the imagery might reflect cultural ideas, conflating a sexual fantasy with a fully formed, real-world political ideology might be an overstatement that simplifies the distinction between fantasy and reality for most adherents.”

This is the strongest counterpoint of the 3, here’s the issue with it:

The simplification & conflation would only be fallacious if:

the correlation was incorrect or it was a sheer one in sextillion coincidence or reach in the first place, example: “empowerment fallacy”

• Unfortunately, what guarantee my argument’s validity is the fact that Macrophilia’s propaganda mirrors where it came from, it derives from the dysfunction of the era that’s given it birth and an outlet in the first place.
• Second, if they weren’t telling us what it is they’re getting hot on, they’re literally telling us through the propaganda. So I’m not making it up, they’re telling us, & they apparently need the world to see it because they’re so “secure” in it they need to shove and peddle it online so they can get a “good job”.

The only reason why it’s loosely an ideology is because they themselves repeat a very specific mantra of vocabulary, very very often.

“They” are not interested in connecting with women in the traditional sense (proof being the inherent sexual incompatibility) vs controlling the imagery of women to fit a toxic, domineering, miserable, or cartoonishly pampering caricature that they deem worthy to surrender to.

TL;DR Their version of a woman that is worthy of their surrender & admiration. Macrophiles are not a strong woman in day to day, the women who holds communities together, run for office, mother (top 3 most important jobs in civilization, PERIOD).

No, they worship & exalt, their woman, their goddess, the giantess. The excuses entail using Feminism, the propaganda insults women, but this parody of women in reality has nothing to do with actual women, because a Giantess — Is not a woman

• Because actual women as they are: Aren’t good enough.

And thus her alleged omnipotence enforces the “insignificance” dogma (& it is a dogma/ideology because their comics/gentle included repeat the same 3–6 deprecation slogans and subtle overtones over & over again) and the “giant mankeeper/babysitter/mega nanny/giant waifu who exists to serve the micro p*nis ” gimmick.

Be it preference or aesthetic choice/ or 9 times out of 10: maladaptive obsessive dependence.

Macrophilia is very, very simple: Women aren’t good enough, their form has to be manipulated & inflated by primarily males to fit the insecurities of the subject (primarily-) male (or even female).

Because if it were secure? Or confident? The inherent inequity of the size gap & size imposition wouldn’t be necessary.

• I said “Necessary”, fetishism & paraphilia entails there is a necessity.

Security is security as one is. If you have security, you have an anchor (aka reality), with an anchor, fantasy to that heavy extent isn’t necessary, if not necessary at all (“Welcome to the NHK” EP19 basically).

And the size is as the device, a vehicle to serve men. They get turned on by being loomed over, but she’s really serving them through her size. The “female supremacy” is just a byproduct, doesn’t mean she really has any control. Because if she’s the size of ….5'000 ft tall, she’ll starve, collapse from oxygen deprivation or go insane from lack of social interaction if humanity doesn’t just nuke her to hell.

That is if dehydration headaches don’t submit her first, that’s the part of the Giantess scenario they don’t show: What happens to them after the tantrum is done? What happens in the after the subject nuts & moves on?

Well naturally, she dies. The Giantess isn’t a person, representing women whilst not being a woman, she’s just as dehumanized as her victims.

Then “feminism” is the excuse: This same feminism that is one of many driving forces on Earth to end inequality/inequity —

“Feminism is a diverse collection of social, political, and ideological movements, but at its core, it is a belief in the full social, economic, and political equality of all genders. It is fundamentally a movement to end sexism, sexist exploitation, and oppression in all forms” —

That same Feminism is name dropped to defend males inventing their own deformed incarnation or “alternative perspective” of femininity, inequity & inequality and meat puppeteering effigies of faux-women to do it, and that’s considered a “challenge” to conventions, or “alternative perspectives on beauty and femininity”.

Any nonsensical safety net semantic one can scrabble together, pure damage control. Please just don’t say anything.

If the people using feminism as a defense are serious?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/We_Should_All_Be_Feminists

Then what we’re really saying is feminism failed it’s goal in being for “everyone”, hence “part 1”.

In trying to end inequity, the movement by putting women ahead then broke men into creating an inequity in their own heads and that’s “Feminism”, that’s “Empowerment”.

YIKES.

The compulsive hunger for the looming doesn’t stem from someone secure in themselves or what women are, or acting on a positive, healthy narrative they internalized to love and celebrate women.

• Vs the silhouette of women being ventriloquized to represent an internal imbalance that has nothing to do with women but everything to do with the subject getting their fix, to avoid fixing themselves. Some even prefer being broken, because facing the source of that imbalance is ‘uncomfortable’.
• This stems from disconnect & contention because in reality: Between women & men, there is a disparity of disconnect and contention.
• My main case is the macro culture of western society, I actually don’t need to lean into the possible “traumas” of the individual, that’s just icing on the cake. If I went that far, that’d just be overkill.

All I will say is, there is a GTS writer that has confirmed that they write dark stories that they do, likely because they had a rough childhood. I won’t out who, or the exact quote. I usually would but I’m going to leave it alone, It’s unnecessary. But many do outright share the reason, many do remember the trigger or the moment, or the what happened that pushed them into it. Or what’s attached to them to this day that’s compelling them to act on it when they don’t have to, but domestic trauma isn’t everyone reason, but the reason for the fixation on the gap is 9 to 10 the same reason.

Point being: Macrophilia is not a Green Flag of something done right, you can only try to re-contextualize the fetish to mean something progressive and hope people don’t think about it for two seconds.

Or the best cases I’ve seen is this bizarre attempt to redefine what femininity or what “normal” even is.

It reads like propaganda stemming from someone who’s given up. The safety & comfort in being defeated.

• It’s disgusting what maleness was been brutally violated & morphed into, with no better guideline.
• You can never erase masculinity but you can confuse men into a state of discord & sterilization. In trying to stave off toxic masculinity, you got rid of men that women wanted.
• It’s only reaching or an “overstatement” if it doesn’t align, it’s not an exaggeration if the parallels match.

There’s nothing worse than someone who I coined as *CONFIDENTLY-WRONG. Because if it were me? I wouldn’t want someone telling me what’s wrong with me without a legitimate basis. Or proclaiming why I DO what I do, when you don’t even know me, you just want to attack than help and you don’t know what you’re talking about anyway.

I get it. So I’ve challenged myself with all of these counter-points already, I’ve run it over again & again because I’m not trying to be on no bullshit.

And so, If birthrates were rising, loneliness was declining for men & women, if the sex relations were better, opting out decreased: I would say nothing (probably…maybe).

Macrophilia at that point would just be a very odd societal quirk, still with a very eerie ideological consistency….

But note how the inherent disparity & disconnect in the alleged “harmless” size gap perfectly illustrates exactly what went wrong?

Macrophilia doesn’t sprout or spike when things are great, it’s the boil of a deeper infection. And I’ve yet hear a solid counter or disprove beyond semantics & weak deflections.

When men retreat, where do they go? Fantasy, indulgence, Man cave, & or addiction: where women can be controlled, shut out, silenced & male impotence will be gaslit and spun as virtues in the realm of cult echo chambers where manhood regresses into perpetual boyhood.

Again: If it were truly a neutral preference, then it wouldn’t be a fetish. Period.

It’s more than a “preference”, it’s a fixation because there’s an overlapping association with arousal with no biological basis or reason.

• Foot fetishism (unlike Macrophilia) has loose biological/neurological basis via “cross activation”, not genetic or inevitable, nor is a designed reproductive feature. But it has neurological basis beyond imprinting & seeing something to imprint on in childhood.
• Foot fetishists are still problematic because a zealot is still an awkward zealot, but the sexual association of feet to genitals (foot massages for women can be vehicles to foreplay or arousal even if they’re not fetishists) — that by itself can be rationalized. Because the same can be done with neck arousal, lips, hands, midriff/stomach, legs, etc.

But this one, Macrophilia?……this one is beyond reproductive association or biological logic, the fetish itself makes it very very clear that the point isn’t reproduction or bonding at all, it makes it it’s mission to make connecting with women (even in gentle) obstructed, misaligned, awkward & contrived. That’s the point.

Thus represents something else entirely, something much more personal, inter-personal, societal, and that is what I’m going after.

“Biological factors

Ramachandran22 proposed that the region in the brain which processes sensory input from the feet is next to the region which processes genital stimulation, and there may be an accidental link between the two. Epstein23 proposed that fetishism may be based on a reflex component within the temporo-limbic region of the brain, and, although usually inhibited, it may be released under certain circumstances such as brain injury.”

— Sexuality in the 21st century: Leather or rubber? Fetishism explained

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6495465/

“What would happen after lower limb amputation? In the Penfield homunculus the genitals are adjacent to the foot and, as one might expect, we found that two patients reported experiencing sensations in their phantom foot during sexual intercourse. One of these patients, a 60-year-old engineer, reported actually feeling erotic sensations in the foot so that his ‘orgasm is much bigger than it used to be’ (Ramachandran, 1993b). Aglioti et al. (1994a, b) undertook a more systematic investigation of several lower limb amputees and found, as expected, that many of them had topographically organized maps proximal to the stump and, often, a second cluster of points on the genitals that yielded referred sensations in the phantom leg. (One wonders whether foot-fetishes in normal individuals may also result from such accidental ‘cross wiring’ — an idea that is at least more plausible than Freud’s view that such fetishes arise because of a purported resemblance between the foot and the penis.)”

https://www.rctn.org/bruno/psc129/handouts/rama2.pdf

— “The perception of phantom limbs The D. O. Hebb lecture V. S. Ramachandran and William Hirstein”

So a fetishist is annoying no matter what, & an obsession in most or any context should be discouraged, but the basic sexual association of a foot kink or a foot fixation the foot-genital overlap is a legitimate neural byproduct.

It’s not a designed feature or inevitable outcome like fertility cues (breasts, hips, waist, supple bottom aka cake/ass/buns etc).

It’s a predisposition that can become a kink or fetish through environmental triggers, but it’s not a core part of reproduction.

Otherwise my operative question will always boil down to

“where is that coming from?”

“why aren’t women enough?”

“what are you compensating for?”

And those aren’t the only questions, just the nicer ones.

Because a foot fetish has an explainable genital association, but Macrophilia basically boils down to bullying someone, wanting a benevolent handler, or breaking someone’s will:

Self-loathing. Belief, a narrative, propaganda, repeated dogma — Ideology.

The two are not the same. And if the best you can do is “Feminism”, then you’re admitting what you’re defending is fraudulent.

“No one tries this hard to justify something innocent, safe and harmless-”

Part 3: “To be fair” (Macrophilia vs base Femdom)

To be fair — with porn in general, it‘s usually a subject/usually male’s drive that is creating a parody of a woman to serve a function, unrealistically.

• This is not unique to Macrophilia and I won’t pretend it is. That goes for any form of erotica for male or female creating a parody of male or female to serve a narrative for male or female gaze.

Femdom —

The difference here is what is the narrative? The difference is context, agenda, as stated with the foot-genital associations, there is a difference.

There’s a “Big” difference between a sexy boss lady at work taking top position while she & the male go commando on her desk — where her position in the situation sexually & in the workplace is of authority or dominance.

That’s totally different vs a hybrid representation of both male perceived/self-imposed ineptitude and showing what the consequence of female empowerment at the expense of men does to boys and men’s sense of self & how they cope with their alleged diminishing stake in society being the sacrifice for female empowerment. Which the result is predictably tiny men being the sacrifice for the giantesses alleged superiority.

• Be it wanting to feel protected through surrender or feeling some false sense of security or safety in being dominated in every conceivable way, violated even: The word is —

Insecurity, Compensatory mechanism, compensation.

The difference between Femdom & Macrophilia is extremity, a woman having control because of personality or presence is actual “sexiness” (a art lost these days), a sexual authority the male acknowledges, respects, & thus subjects unto.

Compared to that, macrophilia’s “surrender” overtone is really a hideous vehicle in how the relinquishing of “control” is due to victimization, defeat & trading conventional norms for an exaggerated worse norm, than it is about women dom being a respected force or a woman simply taking the lead.

Can’t really say Macrophilia is challenging anything when #1 it’s conforming to a hierarchy anyway, hierarchy is primarily a patriarchal construct. So what are you challenging when you conform to patriarchal infrastructure anyway?

So? It isn’t a challenge, it’s following the leader, and “challenging” conventional whatever was another pathetic excuse to make a stupid fetish sound revolutionary lol.

• And #2 the new norm is leagues worse than the previous one, so in comparison Patriarchy (flaws included) looks like paradise because at least Patriarchy built something, gave you internet, the advanced civilization that takes care of them, the same one they fantasize being destroyed.
• The same patriarchy that progress enough to where women have roles to the level of Political Congress, The Senate, anything really. Patriarchy allowing evolution did that, women drove it, but patriarchy allowed that change.

As opposed to being bug sized on the floor, living off crumbs off of someone’s plate because you were born the wrong sex. Western Patriarchy is a lot of things, but it ain’t that shit.

So what is the “challenge” here? When you simply trade one set of rigid expectations for another one, but leagues more toxic, you’re not challegning anything.

Macrophilia is not much of a challenge to traditional norms and more like a competitor with Patriarchy to outperform & see which can be more sexist to men, & misogynist to women.

Macrophilia won that contest. Somehow these cats made Patriarchy look ideal lmfao.¯\_(ツ)_/¯

• Because the question is: what is the subject trying to be *protected from?
• Feel safe *from what?
• Surrender to what & why?
• Retreating from what? Being an adult? That’s not healthy. Adulthood isn’t something to retreat from, it’s a state of being, not a job description. So why do you need a break from being an existence?

Notice how the fetish for most, doesn’t manifest from inability to adjust to demand (because a child imprinting doesn’t have a demand, they’re a child), but that’s what it turns into as they get older.

• “growing up” & “getting older”, aren’t the same thing.

But it’s not a solution to solve what created the void that the fetish is failing to resolve. It’s a band-aid, not an answer to the actual problem the subject is seeking “protection” from.

That’s a brutally different context, a much more narrative driven mindset vs a simple kink for women in boots or something, or glasses kink, or a long hair because that hot teacher in middle school had long hair & wore a skirt.

• Notice how I kept saying “Kink” & not “fetish”, because if anything gets to the point of obsession, you need to take a break, and go find a priority.
• I’m not going to sit here and pretend you’re okay so I can vaguely look like a good person, or this generations warped definition of a good person being synonymous with an apathetic coward.

Because then “acceptance” is just a vehicle to avoid backlash, at that point that’s making it about how I look, Me Me me vs what’s going on with the people I’m speaking on. It’s not about their well being, it’s not about what what they’re doing says about US all, vs it’s me saying the right thing.

• Which is my problem most people speaking on this topic. No one gives a shit.

Macrophilia: is Male coping with Female Empowerment, not embracing it or celebrating it, nor Males wanting more of it.. it’s morphing it into a laughing stock. Mocking & disrespecting it.

It’s coping with receiving no empowerment, which is why the tinies get no empowerment.

There’s a twitter/pixic artist that specializes in wholesome giant waifus. Excellent talent wasted on foolery, he drew a wedding photo, multiple of a tiny groom and a wife that had to have been…..600ft tall?

It was kind of sweet and silliest shit I’ve ever seen because it boils down to: “Why?”

Even if they get affectionate attention from giant gentle waifu, she’s the still the one at the top of the food chain & the lesser priority simultaneously.— an inherently unequal dynamic and that’s the point.

• Not the fact that she’s gentle & that’s what maters, because if that were true, she would be their size & still get the same/better outcome. Cause they can actually be ‘together’ — but she’s gentle and more importantly: bigger, thus still better than you in every way, you got to marry mommy.

100% toxic masked as “wholesome”, lmfao.

“Giantess”, is one of the silliest fetishes on the planet. (Up there with loaded diapers & big nose fetishes. )

But Giantess is interesting because it’s relevant to current day issues and decline. It’s relevant, that’s why this fetish is the most interesting.

And It’s an embarrassment to society and an insult to the species: not just the fetish itself, but more so the people making excuses for it.

• because a child can’t control what they imprint on, but the adult chooses how far they take it. that’s where fetishists lose me.
• peddling this visual cancer like it’s their last day on earth or something.

The “Embrace it = security (as a shield)” fallacy

A Fetishist in retrospect: Is cultivated dependence through fixation. Decades of commitment, one even adopts it as an identity trait, a common coping mechanism for addictive dependence — Identity Entanglement. Keyword: Addict

• Because if I adopt it, embrace it, that means I’m secure/confident in it right? Wrong.
• Or it means: “I render any future criticism irrelevant to me, I know I am horrible and i love it. Thus it being an issue is omitted from my reality.” right? Wrong.
• “Embracing that it’s dysfunctional, embracing being the monster makes one an exception to conviction or accountability.”, Wrong.

Those are the presumed get out of jail free card crap people hope for when people say they “own/accept/embrace” but fortunately, that’s not how that works lmfao.

Mad convenient tho, very very clever. But no one gets criticism/conviction/accountability plot armor for being a clown. And just cause you don’t care, doesn’t make the issue dissipate.

We’d solve the world’s problems in a day, not overnight, within a day — if that’s how life worked.

And keep in mind: I wouldn’t be speaking on this — if they didn’t feel the need to make their issues the world’s business in the first place. Using the internet as their emotional labor punching bag. To go as far as to peddle this trash on Youtube of all places?

Doing too much.

And because it’s not physically “harming” anyone isn’t vindication or a defense either, even though many people want it to be. I hear that cope way too many times from Gemini & Grok “not harming anyone”, until I managed to shut them down too lmfao.

I saw a brotha say once (with kids & a wife too) say that because he felt it necessary to inject that fetish into his marriage and his wife “tries” to work around it “when she can”, which is him saying enough without even saying much. Poor her.

Then claimed it was then okay to have it because it had that much real estate over his mind, he made that nonsense her problem for his own sake, not theirs.

100% Knowing she couldn’t truly live up to that crap and still dropped it on her anyway instead of prioritizing HER, the WOMAN IN REALITY, over something/ the goddess in his head.

But we’re not going to have that conversation right?

On how selfish this crap is, right?

I repeat (on the Gentle GTS context): Is the irony lost on anyone that the tiny in the situation is getting most of the gratification out of the fantasy, in-world speaking? *hence selfish.

• Even if the giantess is psychopathic & into it , all the violence or pleasure the tiny gets is one-sidedly more extreme than whatever she gets because the tiny in reality:

can’t do anything for her, not a damn thing, which is why the wedding pieces were so funny to me.

Think about it: People at parallel scale divorce as is, you know how quick a GTS would divorce a tiny lmfao?

How stale that situation would be, isolating for both, psychologically straining that would get for her? Constantly not trying to kill her partner, her voice would be a source of pain for them.

• And because he’s 100% okay with being dead weight, doesn’t mean she should put up with it.
• And because she’s willing to suffer it doesn’t mean she should, that was the impact of Scott’s sacrifice for Louise in “The Incredible Shrinking Man”, after all the crap he subjected her to. Despite her devotion to him, he made the sacrifice to conceal his existence so she could move on with her life. He did that for her. Real man shit, GROWN man shit.
• Vs calling her “goddess” or some crap, 1000% soft and low quality.

Yes, it’s fantasy, I understand that but hypothetically really, REALLY think about how parallel that is to what women are going through these days in dating with the modern parody of a “man” or “masculinity” that progress has cultivated.

• No, women aren’t bringing the most to the table either, they have room to improve but we can’t deny that in trying to make sensitive men, Americans absolutely fucked American Women’s options.

And that is perfectly illustrated in the sizegap, that metaphorically is what you turned many men into in trying to make a modern man, a docile, compliant little accessory.

I see NOBODY pointing that out, not even Macrocreeps catch that. Not even in casual conversation. And you live in that phenomenon, you live in that decline, the statistics are real so how do you not catch it lmfao.

“As a Gen X woman, this describes the past 25 years, which is why I gave up dating . I’m expected to just give and give and give and get absolutely NOTHING back. If I need any sort of emotional support from my partner, I’m immediately dumped for expecting too much. Because expecting reciprocity is considered too much. In my 20s, I had no problem finding decent guys to date. Men do NOT improve with age! So dating older men isn’t a fix. They’re just better at hiding their uselessness. Sorry, Gen Z!”

— Women Are Refusing To Be In Relationships With Men In Record Numbers, And This Is The Brutal Truth Behind Why

(Because it’s manhating buzzfeed, take it with a grain of salt & don’t read the comments, it’s full of bitter misandrist dumping. But the lack of reciprocity sentiment is the key point here that I’m tying to this topic, that’s the point i’m making.)

Women Are Refusing To Be In Relationships With Men In Record Numbers, And This Is The Brutal Truth…
Women are now 23% less likely to want to date than men.www.buzzfeed.com

“The Guardian calls mankeeping a modern extension of emotional labor, one that turns a partner into a life coach. This isn’t about avoiding vulnerability. It’s about refusing to carry someone else’s emotional weight while getting little to nothing in return. And there’s nothing wrong with feeling that way.”

— “Mankeeping Is Why Women Are Done With Dating”

So Macrophilia is remarkably selfish, because the Giantess, despite the base level companionship — she still, quite literally gets nothing remotely equal in value or outcome out of it. Despite her being physically greater, she’s the lesser recipient, lesser priority. Because he will always be the needy party in need of her laboring.

The people trying to make this shit cute are sometimes more annoying because they think the lack of violence makes it better, they think they’re safe to consume without conscience. 

This is the consequence of the inherent toxicity of the physical disparity, but they paint that scenario as something ideal, cute, or different for the sake of different, or “challenging norms” (which just means “complicate what works”) according to their deranged misconceptions of womanhood.

But in lala-land where male gaze controls women’s wills, she’s apparently 100% okay with getting nothing out of it, because she’s just that nice or so unhinged that her benefit is deprecating him & being told she’s a “goddess” by a man-child 1/100th her size, inflating her ego and that’s the relationship. (“Goddess of Law” anyone?)

NOT Toxic at all.

There’s a difference between it being okay to have it, and you want it to be okay because YOU have it & choose not to let it go because you have a problem, and at minimum you’re imbalanced. 

People don’t need to hurt for it to be addressed and corrected. People don’t need to be hurt for it to be a problem, a threat without a follow-up or a middle finger gesture is technically not hurting anyone but it’s still wrong as an insult.

• So depicting civilization being trampled to death: nothing about that is in anyway disrespectful to the people pushing the visual TO OTHER HUMANS btw —  will never not be incredible to me. That’s how I know something is ‘off’ in the cranium sector. I’ve met some unhinged people IRL, within 6ft, even they would tilt their head at this shit.

Because you’re peddling this shit to other members of your species that you’re depicting being destroyed: That alone is worth a study, an address at minimum.

For lack of a better expression: “The fuck is wrong with you bruh?” Like deadass.

Nothing about that is disrespectful or downright deranged? So a joke on Twitter is worth a cancel, but this is worthy of “Exploration” now. Humanity has fallen that far from sanity? We’re at that point where Civilization has run it’s course to that degree? I don’t think so.

Think about it from their stand-point, they likely desensitized their prefrontal cortex with bombardment and toxic feedback loops from climaxing to that imagery repeatedly. 

How the fuck is the addict going to fix their own shit? Realistically. 

That’s what accountability is for, what’s what we’re for, so why is no one doing it? Helping them?

I know who I am, and what I’m not. People are going to do what they do, they’re not my children, thus not my embarrassment. And I ain’t getting paid for this shit.

But they don’t have to be mine for me to give a shit, cause yes, someone has to give a fuck to say the quiet part out loud — EVENTUALLY.

Why. Is. No. One. Saying. the. obvious? (rhetorical)

Nothing I’m saying requires a degree / aka a badge to buy credibility before I earn it. Nothing I say is genius or 12th level intellect. 

Very painfully basic reasoning here. 

• That alone: is a problem exceeding what these people are actually doing.
• Their peddled propaganda is merely them acting out, a symbol of their damage but the actual troubling element here is the sheer apathy & this “Who cares” attitude surrounding the fetish. 
• And people will have this “let live” vibe while living in the decline that Macrophilia symbolizes & reflects perfectly, and then we’re pretending not to see it #1 or #2 you genuinely didn’t even notice.

Which is leagues more concerning. We need to pay attention.

Part 4: Illusion of Control

How is an animated macabre of a 300–500ft tall woman sprinkling human beings down her throat is in any way “Feminist” or “EMPOWERMENT”. It’s deranged.

((yes some idiot, a human being, not a hormone crazed teenager or a demonic alien trying to sell you that death is actually sexy —No, a grownass human being in human society actually dedicated their life clock to make that & for some fucking reason — that same grown ass adult thought that was cute enough to share for others to digest into their heads. Show humans visage of horrific human suffering & demise.)

Hits different when you say the quiet part it out loud & stop pretending grass is blue and oxygen is a subjective illusion.

• So in through attempting to “own” it by embracing it, is essentially drinking poison and you convinced yourself it’s kool-aid.

It’s actually owning the subject through attachment, deeper association, kind of like the black symbiote from Spider-Man 3.

Thus, illusion of control.

Hence the obsession with control in the fantasy, zero control over self, minimized will, compromised agency/NPC; because through obsession, attachment, control is actually the ony thing you’re giving to the fetish — thus one obsesses over it because you quite literally have no control over yourself. Paradoxical Illusion.

Why do I say this? What is this paradox? Glad you asked, to reiterate: a prison of illusion of control.

1. So naturally, one commits to making a choice to attempt to take control by embracing the fetish so you can eliminate doubt or the prospect that it is indeed a problem
2. When the only choice where you’re in control or exercising agency is in-fact by letting it go
3. but the fetish is all about wanting to be controlled-
4. And so that’s exactly how one operates by clinging to the fetish for dear life
5. Thus you have no control, even over oneself
6. So naturally, one commits to making a choice to attempt to take control by embracing the fetish so you can eliminate doubt or the prospect that it is indeed a problem
7. when the only choice where you’re in control or exercising agency is in-fact by letting it go
8. but the fetish is all about wanting to be controlled-

— — — Ad Infinitum

Illusion of control. Paradoxical.

You want to embrace it, when you embracing it is omission of lack of control. You want to surrender to a Giantess (scowling tyrant jacking off on a city or a smiling gentle waifu bot) when all that she is is dependent on the narrative you project onto her, thus you are god, not her. Paradoxical illusion.

Only in reality can one give themselves (not surrender) but give yourself to their wife or partner and it not be a paradox.

• Why? AGENCY. Because she’s not a creation stemming from someone’s misconceptions, confusions, or insecurity; a child’s raising in concept can be a product of insecurity or abuse, but a woman in isolation, a person (male or female), is an entity with actual agency.

In fact, lack of control is why many of these people got the “women” metaphorically her stake with a “man” lost in translation.

Or at worst? Lost their goddamn minds.

Not because they fell into macrophilia at all, everyone is afforded stupid phases in their life, but so many DEVOTED themselves to it to this day, in discords clamoring & congregating like cockroaches, discussing any media or upcoming anime with a giantess in it. 

It’s hilarious dude.

That’s where you lose the plot, like what are you even doing with your life at that point, your bloodlines survived for this shit? THIS is what it all led to?

• Cause to no one’s surprise & I’ve said this before, many times-

The obsession with “growth” is a direct correlation with a Macrocreeps refusal to “grow up”.🧠

And “shrinkage” is the reverse, it’s a literal metaphor for regression, hence the lessening of a person to a state of weakness or metaphorical infancy, going BACKWARDS to the helpless state of a child. That’s the point of the “surrender”.

• A child has to surrender to parental authority, giants. This is why I say “mommy” sarcastically. There’s a purpose to what I say.
• Or according to their fantasy, apparently an inferior state of a human that should be abused & used like an object.

Lack of progression, to an extent — suspended development.

Women can be tinies too/or giant oriented macrocreeps, but It is predominantly a male self-hatred fetish, the males are the one’s spearheading it, making short films & shit and controlling the production flow, as usual. 

If people put all that energy into your own families, or a funds account for your kids, could fix sex relations in half a month.

Hell put that energy into yourself, go learn a new language, just wasting all that damn time. On what and FOR what.

Because misogyny for a man is hatred of himself. As is a women’s hatred of men, is hatred of herself. Neither would exist without female and male essence.

The fetish is ripe in societies where men are openly disrespected, abused, omitted from cultural relevance and neglected, and that’s normal culture that boys grow up in.

• So macrophilia existing ? Isn’t a surprise. It’s a consequence, an outcome. No exactly strange or weird, even in it’s inherent derangement.

Men building the cities but the women are gods that can do no wrong while building nothing. Empowerment for the women, men get higher suicide rates.

https://afsp.org/suicide-statistics/

But WOMEN are the one’s that need more empowerment, macrophilia is men wanting more female empowerment guys, said or “theorized” by the experts.

Because macrophilia is such a mystery.

The concept & content of this fetish exposes the fetish. The root cause is society doesn’t give a shit about men, to where men disregard their own stake in both the lives of women, civilization itself, and now a fetish /quasi-cult.

• That’s the fetish in a nutshell, men being irrelevant to civilization and women.
• Men no longer having a stake with women, women leaving men behind.
• Women above, men below.
• Pedestal for she, crumbs for he.
• Disconnect, decline, dysfunction, imbalance.

Nothing of what the brain does is accident.

Part 5: “Where credit is due”

Men wanting to be micro footslaves because they’ve seen enough “#KillAllMen” & “#MenAreTrash” to be convinced that they’re subhuman.

Got to spread it here, there, everywhere because that’s how a virus works. That’s how insecurity works, it’s not secure in one dimension.

Now you tell me how a glorified narrative like that in art, amateur movies, animations, games, wikis etc. etc. Dehumanization as damn near a religion “doesn’t harm anyone”, and then explain to me how healthy and or helpful it is for ANYONE to pump epic level self-loathing death worship into themselves for decades on end like digital cocaine.

Nothing but crickets. We can make excuses, but rationalizing it gets a little difficult.

Even Grok & Gemini can’t explain that shit to me.

Because, I’ll give people credit where credit is due, you can argue emotion semantics 100% the “live & let live”, “not harming anyone”, fine, it’s not an argument, it’s 100% cope and deflection: but okay, I get it, that’s the best you can do. Deflect and hope people back off.

That’s really the only logical stance you can take here lol.

• But you can NOT rationalize or defend any of it. And everyone knows this, which is why people endorsing “exploring” it, only show selective parts of Macrophilia, not what it actually is. 
• And only argue semantics and not substance.
• Meaningless statements like Giant women challenging conventional norms, but ignoring the part where Giant women/Even minors & children being fetishized are shown killing people is the iconography of the fetish.
• Nothing, nothing but crickets.

This can only thrive when people stay stuck on stupid on purpose & hope nobody says anything.

Even if you tapped into the perfect VR experience of a Giant Woman harming you, violating you in every conceivable way and mocking your “teeny weeny” manhood like a school bully which is basically what this boils down to.

• Or coddling you like a goddamn baby, whispering her mighty voice emphasizing how safe you are in her presence, so gentle but unaware of her omnipotent power & bla bla bla Blaaaaaaa. Men ain’t shit, woman is god, we get it. 
• All it is is the modern strong woman archetype surrounded by the fickle, skinny, indecisive, apologetic, whipped, weak man archetype we see everywhere in tv shows, games, and movies.

So again, we know exactly where the fetish came from, the abusive west that successfully neutered *enough men to make a dent in both collective happiness, birthrates, and apparently mental well being.

Each generation possesses less adults, and even less men.

Eventually, you have to get back to reality, where women are not your enemy, nor your mile-high nanny, nor your overlords.

Hence the problem: Peter Pan Syndrome, Boy stuck as a boy doing little boy shit — FOREVER.

Sure you’ve got your parasites & attention seeking grifters calling themselves “Goddess [Insert name]” on twitter making asses of themselves, with social medias out the whaazoos ready to milk these abuse starved NPC’s for every buck & drip of drool or attention they can get.

Taking full advantage of these mental issues for their own gain, and feel like Queens in the process. They say something stupid like

“Somebody say hi to me, and maybe I won’t crush your town.” — actual comment

Just the most attractive, 5 year old toddler shit imaginable. And they get supported for it.

They just need to play a role and entertain boys they’d never give so much as a conversation to, let alone a side glance or meaningful emotional support if they bumped into them on the street.

• *But here, get stiffy from a picture of my mouth, dur. Now we’re best friends.
• *I’m going to call you “WOW you all are really tiny!” and you respond to me, and that’s our online dynamic. Healthy.

Just the most depressing shit, this is what human interaction has become.

Or be that person claiming to use a crush fetish aka abuse glorification as a ”bridge to therapy”; I shit you not, a woman said this on camera with a straight face.

Imagine it, using meth as a bridge to therapy for a drug addict with black track marks on their arms, abstinence you said?

Nope, more drugs, more abuse, more of the problem, that’s the bridge to therapy and recovery. Thanks, Jessie Switch. Genius.

Part 6: “these are someone’s children”

Frankly, If mass genocide is cute or hot, what won’t you entertain & internalize into your mind or Whitelisted as a desire? Becomes the question.

That’s what psychologists need to be addressing, “what WON’T you entertain-?” when the fetish eventually escalates?

Here’s the fallacy with the “let live” cope:

(not clinical disorders *because the bar is so goddamn high for academia* but it is a mental issue & maladaptation)

Fact is, when it comes to mental issues being made to be everyone’s business via spreading it on most platforms, we have to keep in mind — — — -(And I’m going to be more brutally blunt here going forward)

The rest of the world is not your brow beaten, misogynist, anti-human, purse whipped little macrophile cult-faction where everyone’s in on it. #1

#2 When you make your issues the world’s business on “social media” not “private”, nor “Your Media” “Social media” on the “Inter- net”, it’s all our business now. You don’t get free-bees, especially when what you packing is that disrespectful. 

Cause your shit pops up on searches sometimes, and so, the “let live” luxury doesn’t apply anymore. 

Psychologists were ZERO help, & every time I see a macrophile with doubts on Reddit, they’re immediately met with enablement and damage control because the fetishists make it about their condition than it is about the person looking for help. 

POV: If you have doubts, & your doubts make logical sense, then that threatens MY confidence in the fetish. So? 

I’ll erase your doubt, enable it, bring you back to into the quicksand to serve myself & maintain status quo than help you, which should be my first priority but it’s not.

So between experts with noodles with spines, enabling articles dating back almost more than 10 years & echo chambers —  I did the work myself. Now we’re here.

Let live applies when you keep it your business, back when fantasies stayed in bedrooms & not turned into online spectacles.

Keep in mind please: (these cats are obviously regular people with jobs, routines, kids, families, but possess an unconventional degree of “functional insanity” or Maladaptive Impairment, derangement.)

Whether here, or anywhere else, none of my tackles are an effort to dehumanize to go after these people; despite how they take pleasure in trivializing human life like a joke, these people are still someone’s children & have a genuine problem, they’re just as much a victim of the society that warped them as anyone else.

Beyond that, apparently, if genocide is a turn on, these people just aren’t that bright. So keep in mind these are (as with anyone) someone’s child with a social/emotional/psychological affliction stemming from environmental catalysts & abuses (not always), but 99% environmental/cultural bondage, and neglect — which is in reality not their fault.

Imprint misfires is responsible for the seed they’re acting on, but they didn’t choose what they imprinted on. The caveat tho, again, is the fetishism is their fault, they chose to take it there, to take it that far and choose to turn it into something far exceeding the effort put into Presidential campaigns. The imprint was outside their control, but the fetishism is a choice. And can be unlearned. *eg. Neuroplasticity*

The process of imprinting on anything is natural. But the initial suggestion brewing in their minds is not normal, it is not natural. And no the imprint didn’t turn them into fetishists or make them do anything, lack of house training creates fetishists, obsession is a behavioral setback.

Babies don’t come out the womb, cuteness at the ready thinking “Swallow them whole, Julie.”, obviously deranged stemming from a confusion planted later in life.

Something obviously happened here to these people outside their control & then they made the decision to escalate it into a fetish.

So despite my aggressive tone (& no I ain’t apologizing for it), they’re not a problem to be removed, as much as they royally piss me off. The mindset however, that they’re entertaining & channeling ad infinitum is where my criticism (& very apparent eternal agitation) is directed at, most of the time. Because if you’re the one pushing this shit in the first place, then I’m looking at you, obviously.

A mindset doesn’t have power until you “surrender” to or “accept” it, entertain it, and give it “power”.

• Then make it everyone’s business. The core of how it got on my radar in the first place.
• The crap that goes on in said DeviantArt comment sections, trust and believe, that isn’t going to fly out here. Better ask somebody.

Games, anime, little amateur movies, community, tell your partner, etc. your misery needs our company, we get it.

But we want everything except a solution to what is a blatant problem by redefining what even is a problem or raising the bar for what constitutes a problem. 

Which is where Psychologists & most of academia lose me entirely. THAT’s the real reason why the bar forpsychological disorder is so high, pure laziness.

”NOO!! you can´t make people get giant and masturbate to it, this is unrealistic”-

A grammatically sound Macrocreep actually said that sarcastically in a group where no one will challenge them & thought they were the clever boy, lol. Real tough guy.

All this “teensy”,” teeny”, “tiny”, “little” bullshit ad infinitum like 4 year old children well into your goddamn 60s & 70s, still obsessing over the same 5–7 vocabulary words. A true paragon of the best humanity has to offer.

Still looking for the comforting the bosom of mommy & daddys domineering presence in some fucked up lala-land.

Not everyone is you, some people had good childhoods that translated to functionally, mentally sound people who get by on breast/hips/ waist ratio/ Lingerie/ napes/ etc. between 4–6ft women like a normal person with a reasonable kink to season it with.

Listen to me: Just because it’s been in your head since wayback, doesn’t make it your baby, a fetish is not your baby, it’s not sacred, it’s an imprint glitch.

Real men don’t need wardens & handlers like inept man-children with no direction of their own masculinity, or lack thereof, which is what this is really about, a generation of lost boys:

And “Real men” just means “Keep your balls attached & have some self-respect, cause no one’s going to have it for you on your behalf.”

FINAL STRETCH: “We know where it came from”

Macrophilia is not an expression, and if I loosely wanted to say it is: It’s not expressing anything I’d wish on the children of someone I actually hated.

What is it “expressing” (artistically or otherwise) actually?

• the empowerment excuse is invalid, cope
• the feminism excuse is invalid, cope
• strong women?, invalid, more cope (all explained why)
• It’s expressing rationalizing being a selfish, useless, burden in a relationship. And glorifying staying “behind”, while women do all the work in the dynamic. Gentle or Destructo — it’s the same result

Even when it’s just a neutral scenario/ art of a giant woman in a forest, it’s still a narrative of inflating a woman’s importance into a theme of pedestals & woman worship. Which is where feminism ultimately dropped the ball with the rise of gynocentrism: Pussification of the male, and the male confusing his love for the female with putting her on a pedestal. Which is what Macrophilia is, a conflation, a social tumor.

“-the male confusing his love for the female with putting her on a pedestal.”

The “Giant-” in the “Giant+ess”, is just an unearned pedestal, that’s all it is. Another form of toxic masculinity. 

The Fetish doesn’t work even in artistic neutral, because it’s the byproduct of an unfortunate fungal growth that ultimately happened because of Feminism, the misconception of “Female supremacy”, which is not Feminism.

But Ironically, people will swear on their mama that Macrophilia is some Feminist power fantasy, because if it’s Feminist that means it’s a good thing and thus above criticism. 

If you criticize it, you must be afraid of strong women….

(Literally a comic about a giant woman eating her daughter alive, why? Because she was “tiny”….uhh that’s it. You beating off yet? )

“Feminist” Right, nice cope bruh.

This retreat/security/safety/safe space/ reprieve/ this regression is the comfort in being a child, while mommy makes all the decisions, protects the subject from all the bad things, you are the center of attention (positive or negative), and you feel safe under maternal authority that has control over everything that happens to you. 

Her will determines your fate. 

hat is soooo attractive, lemme tell you. Nothing more titilating to the female kind than a male who wants to be weak, and useless.

It’s not creativity, it’s a cope, antithetical to a competent adult model, because the fetish communicates plainly —  To some very specific degree: the subject can’t handle adulthood & needs a time capsule backwards to the state of a toddler, hence the size regression.

• TL;DR A cry for help, which is why these people’s obsession lives online, thrives in echo chambers where their eternal insecurity can get gaslit into a virtue. The ideal.
• Constant pool of validation, so logic, doubt, and growing as a person never sinks in. 
• And when someone does drop logic in the mix, crickets.
• Nobody has anything to say, because what the hell could you say? “Leave us alone?” Lol. 

Macrophilia, like a lot of modern sensibilities of a “strong woman”, Macrophilia is also a distortion of man’s natural desire for the womb-man.

Contrary to what some people might say to slander or insult the fetish in jest, none of this is actually “weird” or an “incel fetish”. Pathetic? No question. “Incel”? No, it’s the outcome of cultural castration.

It’s a Manhood sacrifice rite/humiliation ritual/Abolishment of agency.

Not because she takes the lead because he respects her agency. 

His, the tiny’s contribution to the scenario is void, his stake is diminished —and her stake is so exaggerated it’s a deformity, her strength is an anomaly, incompatible with both the male and civilization itself.

That is a Giantess.

Ain’t nobody trying to justify that , I guarantee you this— 

The Inequity (something Feminism strives to get rid of to this day) is the entire point of the fetish. That’s why the two do not mix, among other reasons already addressed.

It’s a fetish born from generational trauma, neglect, isolation, dysfunction, disconnect, misunderstanding, mistranslation and mistreatment of both sides.

Even when the woman is gentle, there’s always a subtle subtext of women being intimidating, or the men or people around her being afraid, even when she’s unaware of her physical position.

The reason for that is a lot of them are in fact: Doubting their manhood, and are indeed afraid. Including the one’s in relationships.

• Having someone doesn’t mean you’re complete, it means you were available. Which is why some (even with a real woman close to them) still feel the need to inject that obsession into the relationship, because she isn’t enough. Even if the partner is receptive & tries to play along, It’s never enough. And it’s selfish & they don’t even realize that’s what it is.

So Macrophilia existing actually isn’t weird, again, it’s a consequence of generational double standards, abusen, neglect & inequity.

Mind you, this isn’t a reaction to Patriarchy’s inequity, males creating an inequity in fantasy as a cope to what Feminism tried to do for the good of everyone, but politically it became a woman centric paradigm, which is why that’s Macrophilia’s anti-reality. Same goes for male giant macrophilia but as you can tell, clearly, the female centric macrophilia in gynocentric society — surprise surprise is the dominant narrative.

Big shock.

Which is why the SIZE+GAP is the core inequity that keeps these people on the plantation.

That doesn’t make it normal or actually “natural”, it’s a deranged parody. It’s disgusting how brutal some people will disfigure their own natural impulses of connection to other people, then claim they made friends through the fetish. It’s not worth it bro. 

We made a pal through genocide worship & mankeep mascots, congratz. Jus’ sayin.

But that’s also the fault of the internet making access to sexual gratification. too. damn. easy.

But the consequence of it existing makes total sense in retrospect, which is why the correlation of real life events, sociologically, is not a stretch, or an overstatement. It’s a very clear, very vivid reflection in the mirror.

We know exactly where it came from.

(I’ve said this before and I’ll keep saying it, “this is not a mystery”)

• At best, an embarrassment; at worst, an exhibit of modern society’s failure to affirm women & girls without abandoning men & boys.
• We lambast the ideal of the stoic man, masculinity is toxic, demand men be more vulnerable, & when they are, they’re not taken seriously. And now, they’re a labor for it.

 

Nothing they do is good enough:

• “as he should”
• “happy wife happy slave life”
• manspreading
• mansplaining

“mankeeping” (to explain my usage of the term, the origin of it is actually to illustrate men being a burden to women via women socially & emotionally maintenance men to the point of burnout, because men don’t have many friends & don’t reciprocate ; the caveat to this is the emotional, psychological, financial, & social burnout women place on men despite how many friends women have, men are subject to vents & dumps. And the fact that men do give back just as much as women do because women for some reason don’t filter how much they give, then the other person is at fault because she overextended, this happens with LESBIANS as well, so men aren’t the common thread, it’s women. 

We overlook all that but women complaining about their labor with men is turned into a equity talking point. So it’s a double standard & I have my many reservations about this 2025 “Man+sult” to add to the list of misandrist propaganda, but my application of it here on macrophilia— is simply to mean “inequitable burden”/ “lack of reciprocity” which is the definition of it anyway.)

• #MenareTrash
• Y Chromosome is “shrimpy”
• Y Chromosome is shrinking & disappearing, fear tactics everywhere
• Women are leaving men behind,

Attack, attack, attack, attack for decades. Macrophilia is not a mystery, it’s a spawn. Men can’t do anything right, men👏can’t 👏get 👏a 👏break👏.

• Expecting men to suffer in silence with this simmering hole in their chest.
• Or if they do open up, then that in itself is a problem or a burden. A “labor”, lol.
• All with no societal support on the level that women get: festering in these inadequacies & one of many copes is either blaming women, macrophilia, fetishes in general, obsessions, waifu’s, addictions, or other toxic outlets. Some kind of Idol worship to focus their lives on in lack of a life.

They all share the same theme: Misogyny, and HUNGER FOR PURPOSE, to surrender is a form of service, these boys, just want to serve something (this is instinct, providing for the family is the service), a woman. These boys need purpose. A stake. You don’t need a degree to piece this together.

• And the best our experts can do to explain this- is to theorize that Macrophilia aka ‘Male Self-Hatred fetish’ is a harmless fantasy/ manifestation of men wanting or desiring more powerful women in a society that is already gyno- (Female) centric. Illogical.

A man that’s empathetic, doesn’t have to be vulnerable. 

A compassionate man can be vulnerable, but he is not a weak because vulnerability is not the same as an emotional man. 

They’re not the same things, but we don’t make that clear —

So men sometimes confuse vulnerable with just being a weaklink, an emotional floodgate. And then find safety & reprieve in essentially being a helpless baby.

Society got what it wanted, a defanged, sterilized male: (key word) NON-THREATENING boytoy.

While not knowing what it was asking for, actually. And Macrophiles are a partial result of that misunderstanding.

The loneliness rise for men AND women? Is more tangible evidence. Just another “gap” of separation, just like the size gap, disconnect.

Otherwise the only way the Giantess is superior is everyone else has a handicap? That’s not power, it’s a crutch.

That’s like calling yourself a “god” because you can beat a 2 year old in a fist fight. Color me impressed.

• Like, If the only way you’re omnipotent is when everyone else is handicapped: That’s Pathetic & silly.

Train your children to be secure in order to produce “adults”, not produce more grown-ass children cosplaying adulthood. 

Looking for giants to exercise or enforce a mock simulation of “adulthood” FOR THEM & totalitarian Government control over them to get that exciting jolt in their stomach.

Because apparently adulthood and control is precisely what they didn’t have in the first place. Which is why they need to see a giantess exercising what they’re not doing, symbolically, not literally.

• So they run to a giant woman to be man enough for the both of them since he’s not going to step up to women’s level, which is not that far ahead of men, despite what articles tell you.
• Which is…. actually accurate to what some men aren’t doing IRL, due to no training or proper guidance, no mentors, no societal reinforcement.

So he’s castrated verbally, emotionally, socially, or physically, or just her presence is so overwhelming he has to monologue how “insignificant” he is “compared to her” —

That one’s a very very very popular line, it’s heartbreaking really — when it’s not gut wrenching hilarious. 

It’s just a castrated buck (the author) narrating that he has no stake in the life of the modern woman.

Now you tell me how that’s harmless & not worth outreach or a single fuck to give. Male isolation & generational destruction is something to “explore” & “embrace”, absolute disgrace. Disgusting.

It’s either symbolically the consenting or forceful erasure of masculinity. 

Or trivialization/mockery & destruction of femininity — usually it’s both.

Everyone catching hands from the subtext.

Macrophilia is the epitome of the concept of “overcompensation” which is why the writing in their craft is frankly, absolutely, god awful, even as a neutral critic consuming a medium: HORRIBLE products with good production value, but with about as much substance as an air sandwich.

• Please hug your kids, build children up while they’re small and vulnerable or risk them remaining that way forever, imprisoned inside their own mind, and all that that implies.
• Not to stave off Macrophilia specifically (you’re not god, you can’t be there 24/7 nor control what they imprint on), but to prevent as much complication as possible, period.
• Being a macrophiliac can be unlearned, a child doesn’t choose what they imprint on, but to make it a fetish, is a choice.

Neuroplasticity —🧠💪

proves this Macrophilia foolishness and fetishes in general are hardened concepts through behavior, not cemented in nature nor permanent.

https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-brain-plasticity-2794886

We, society are very quick to forget how malleable the human mind is, how easy it is to break people- or the truest extent of what people will normalize (no matter what it is) in order to cope with something else entirely.

The one’s claiming they embraced or owned it; are often compensating the most subconsciously. Like wearing it as a badge of honor, to impress who exactly? To convince yourself? Bah, pure compensation. Trying to convince others to convince themselves that they’re A-Okay, cool story.

For decades on end, same feedback loop, nothing but stagnation.

It’s why, despite some making decent art (in STYLE only)- their content overall sucks pure donkey ass. 

It looked better & better every few years, but things kind of leveled out/fell off when they started making better animations, then the art scene got somewhat redundant, the best artists already peaking what’s possible and then Ai was like a shot of adrenaline so the impressionable talentless members are really going to go nuts with this foolery and they have —  as I saw coming. 

Whole thing’s gotten dry nowadays ngl, even for comedic value It just lost it’s bite, it’s so boring. 

pov: “I’m insignifcant compared to her”

Macrophile “content” aka propaganda lost it’s edge, no cap.

But despite the aesthetic improvements, it’s still absolute garbage.

Like a pile of shit sprinkled with pink diamonds, on a dinner plate & the experts told you it’s a chocolate sundae.

Like a recurring nightmare about a child’s understanding of exaggerated portrayals of strong women, trying to justify itself through repeated, forceful exposure.

(Because if you numb yourself to it, then it’s not a problem anymore right? Wrong.)

• All a compensatory mechanism for something totally different from what’s being projected & yet so clear/way different from what you see is not what it means.
• Hoping anyone sees that projected trauma, horror & pain and then says “good job, more pls”.

Not it. I take a bizarre comedic glee in the fact that some of us will be well into our 60s-70s still on this same exact bullshit, like a glitched NPC, stuck in the same dialogue loop until the video game is just turned off permanently.

Yet another means to defang the human being, another form of generational bondage.

Be honest, all of us. Don't project a toxic negative misdirection / or specifically a toxic positive obfuscating subtext onto it to give it a better sales appeal to the masses for the sake of vindication, which is just damage control, lying with a straight face.

Pre-emptively attempting to control the narrative about this thing before the truth eventually comes out. 

(Darkness submits to light, for darkness is a state of absence of light. Universal fact)

Something like this, as with any form of corruption or confusion even WORSE than Macrophilia: it only emulates the ugliness, dysfunction & benevolent toxicity it hailed from, western culture's real time decline and social disconnect of loneliness, constant strife, gaps, gaps, pedestals, gaps, separation, gaps, opting out, gaps, isolation, gaps, misery, gaps, gaps, unnatural, contrived, disconnect. 

Pay attention to what it's blatantly telling you, not what they/me/we/you want it to say, even if it means appropriating Feminism by force in order to do it.