A lot of these Hollywood films are trailers for the movie you’re living in.
Tuesday, September 30, 2025
Rocky vs Drago | Rocky IV (1985) Reaction Mashup
Monday, September 22, 2025
"How to make it stop" (size fetishism) /r
"Basically, I have a giant fetish and I absolutely hate it. I've had it for years and I hate the fact I have it. It makes me deeply uncomfortable despite me telling myself it's normal and ok to have a weird sexual interest. Like, it's genuinely causing me great mental distress the fact i have it and I just want to know if there's a way "to make me not have it anymore"
Thanks for sharing. **
It persists despite what you say because what we want to be true there boils down to a destigmatization efforts, which is cultural subjectivity and has nothing to do with reality.
It's ok to admit that a child's imprint misfire that created the seed was normal, but the fetish itself is not. Repeating these fickle destigmatization talking points only exacerbates the problem. As its been for more than a decade.
Fetishes are not sacred concepts. Acknowledge this first, then letting it go becomes easier.
- macro-isms Is symptom of a cultural saga but not a clinical illness, nor is it a benefit, natural/genetic/ nor a passed on evolutionary advantage
- You don't need it, it needs you. Remember that.
- It prevailing in the mind is just lingering impressions from years ago circulating throughout the brain, reinforced through internet shenanigans
- it's sexual & it likely (not always) derived from childhood imprinting miswire, that by itself is why it's persistent.
There's no quick way to not have it anymore, but there is a way to divorce it gradually
- Slowing it's roll won't be like flipping a switch
- what will determine the difficulty of leaving it behind, is lingering invasive thoughts prevailing of the fetish solely due to how long the mind has been subjected to the media.
Be it a person, a scene, an image. Go back to the source of which triggered it & realize in reality: it meant nothing. Rob it of it's power, take actual control, & that requires making peace with it, not accepting it, making peace.
If it was a movie scene, then it's a stupid scene in a movie, meaningless. If it was a good movie 'MvA', watch it. What needs to be normalized is defanging the triggers. Not make a career out of turning nothing into something it's not.
And if therapy or seeing a licensed official is needed to do that, do it.
But "owning it", is not taking control, letting it go is total agency through divorce.
TL;DR Don't distress yourself, A fetish is not as significant as people think it is, it's not permanent, it's a psychological aftertaste you can train out through consistent counterconditioning . Neuroplasticity is real, you can re-train fixated brain stimuli, you have to be consistent & find other focuses, goals, priorities.
learned behaviors can be unlearned, it's just exaggerated because fetishism & easy internet access with no barrier can incentivize devotion.
- Regardless If you can't remember the origin-- focus on what in the fetish triggers you specifically
- Dissecting what & why of the triggers specifically & realizing it's not who you are. It's an adoption of a faulty imprint.
- Finally, connect the dots between fantasy with IRL parallels, macrophilia at base, is just a contrived convolution of human sexual relation, even vore which is just a mask for oral sex.
Deprive the urge the reward of dopamine, starve it. The fuel for the eternal hunt for sizefix is dopamine; a fetish like many devotee behavior is a reward-driven reinforcement behavior which incentivizes addiction & adoption, but this one it's amplified because of how epic the scale can be. Deprive the reward, remove the triggers.
"Closure", the word is closure.
But you have to do the work to get there, & that by itself is why many just dive into indulgence, it's easier to just sink to the bottom. The path of least resistance is always easier.
Where, What, Why.
The *how? is irrelevant, children's imprinting is unpredictable, subject to error, & its the only "normal/natural" phase of this entire situation. Children are supposed to imprint, what they imprint on is the caveat, and how far they take the pretense of what they think they felt of what they saw is where the issues start.
A brain glitch.
- Most kids of varying age don't know what they're looking at or how to process it, nor do they know to ask the parents about what it is they feel or saw.
Most people's trigger-happy descent into it derives from lack of information and other people's hatred of it/ or unfortunately of themselves for having it, derives from lack of information.
Limit social media time, delete folders, bookmarks, digital hygiene. Cut the fetishes lifeline. You have to replace it with a vocation (dedicated or casual) and form a new habit chain for your brain to imprint on.
"I hate everything about having a giantess fetish" /r
we're not delivered into life to be destroyed, violated or played with; there's nothing to give your "freedom" up to, love yourself enough to let childish things go."I hate the fact that I want to give up my freedom to a horny giant."
"I hate that I prefer tall girls. And the thought of the possibility of overlooking my soulmate just because I’m head over heels over a girl who’s taller than them."Preferring tall girls is not a problem, hyper-fixation is issue. Don't view people through the lens of fetishism, if there's no logical/legitimate reason to why you're stuck on that one thing, then re-evaluate it, trace it back to the roots. Know thyself.it's not about what someone thinks. Even with the best VR experience-- it will still never exist, sustain, or bring any meaningful purpose, that's where the need for retreat to fantasy comes from for many: Lack of purpose, lack of stake in reality, which many men suffer in Japan, America, etc. & to no one's surprise Macrophilia surges in countries where men are suffering, neglected, or left behind by the culture."Worse, what if that potential soulmate likes me back? What would they think about me if I overlooked them because of some stupid giantess fetish?"
One can only play make believe. Thus a counterfeit anti-reality.
You need to decide if a counterfeit experience you feel beholden to surrender your freedom to for some reason, a parody mocking humanity, mocking women (the main resource of the fantasy) is worth prioritizing over the only life you'll have to live in THIS life.
Let alone how it dictates how you view other human beings because of how much real estate you might be giving to the deluded fixation, getting a grip on that is more important than what someone thinks.Getting chills over something that basic, is trivial, concerning &, if you "can't help" it, take breaks."I hate the fact that I get chills when a tall girl stands over me, and I can’t help but grossly fetishize them."
Question it, always. But hating yourself / or the fetish, is pointless.
Freedom is what you feel you have to give up, so your freedom for your mind is exactly what you take back. Divorce it through distance, make that the new habit, that's the only real way to take control.
"Owning it" or accepting it is just more surrender through adoption. Cope for cope, which is another means to submit to it to avoid letting it go because of lack of security without it, paradoxical. The illusion of control.
Start with 24 hours, upgrade to 2 days, & so on, without it. Once a week even, gradual.
Reality is the solution, to find security/protection/affirmation here. Not in Lalaland for entire life.As you shouldn't think tall girls as such, it's off-base. Good for you for questioning it.."I don’t want to think of taller girls as these protective gentle giants. I want to just want to think of them like I do everyone else."
"protective gentle giants" is both sweet in sentiment and a bit creepy just by how out of touch it is, because it's basically wanting mommy (the first significant giant in a babys life usually), which is GTS & 'shrinking' in a nutshell: regression, going backwards. Infantilism.You are fully capable of seeing tall girls as they are (like everyone else), you need to give your brain a break from the nonsense, let it detox, doesn't mean the thoughts will just say "Bye" but if you're not pounding your mind with it, you're less likely to be ruled by it.
Thin air can get a guy hard, it just happens dude.
"I hate the feeling of inferiority, and the fact that it makes me hard."
Otherwise that's the era you live in, manhood crisis. Masculinity attacked constantly, boys lacking mentors. Fathers are inept, trivialized or just absent. #FutureisFemale, all that jazz
It's not like the West respects or honors men, the ppl that build EVERYTHING. So this desire for inferiority is not "weird", because we know where it comes from: western society's decline
Its a consequence of Gynocentric declining civilization that men tangibly built & yet are neglected by constantly into feeling insignificant & having zero stake in it, thus many feel small.
It's a generational bondage for our boys, men in japan are going through something similar. Again, this is why many retreat to the counterfeit for a false sense of security through surrender or parody of reality.Because your mind was oversaturated with internet sewage, pounded into your head until the subconscious lens of the world was legitimately violated, that's how propaganda works, distortion of reality."I hate that to me girls are like some protective weapon, I don’t think of anyone as unworthy of my attention, but I can’t help but notice the giants because of my stupid fetish."
There's nothing wrong with you beyond what you're subjecting yourself to for no meaningful reason.
A fetish is not an inherent, nor a sacred trait ppl should just tolerate, it's not above challenge. It's an imprinting glitch. Random, not destiny.
It's not something mom or dad nor antiquity passed down to you as an evolutionary advantage. It's advantageous of absolutely nothing, a mockery of human connection, meaningless.
You have it on the brain, cause ya gave it too much real estate. Take a break.
Adulting 101: Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.Understood, respect for you being brave to express dissent. More should do so.
"This isn’t a role play post. I genuinely hate having this fetish, and how it makes me fetishize people."
Sexualizing a person and fetishizing them is not the same thing, one sexualizes when they see physical traits for reproductive purpose. Fetishizing is projecting unrealistic obsession specific based delusions specifically, not always sexual or for reproduction but paraphilia vs reducing someone to a thing of criteria, because a misconception one adopted.
Show adoration, but don't fetishize people. The fetish is not making you do anything, you're not powerless here, this is part of the lie of the fantasy bleeding into IRL. Your mind is acting out in times of arousal because it's been trained to associate one with the other from repeat reinforcements on your neurological pathways, especially if you splooge to it, it's science.It's nothing worth hate, nor endorsement, it's worth overcoming. Try replacing it with something more productive, keeping busy, form new habits, learn a language, find something, re-train the brain.
Monday, September 15, 2025
The Charlie Kirk Cover-up is COLLAPSING But Liberals Are Still Desperate...
Thursday, September 11, 2025
"New Poll Reveals What People Truly Care About" Michael Knowles video (comment reply)
For conservative men, one of the top things they value is having children.
A commentor reasonably retorted with this:
“To be fair, it’s not the men who have the children. Women have the children. They get pregnant, they carry, they give birth, and they hope the men stick around through it all.”
https://youtu.be/2gRJ-47TNro?feature=shared
That first sentence is more than a fair point, but with a flaw.
Of course, conservative men want kids more likely, they aren’t going to be giving their bodies to deliver the baby, true true. Agreed.
- If they did, they’d probably want it less, but if they did, women would be obsolete to the species as the natural threshold of life, so women really should stop taking their primary biological stake for granted.
There’s plenty in civilization that women aren’t carrying their weight’s worth of, namely dangerous jobs, despite females being the majority of humanity.
*Women have children, men have the seed that makes women’s role in the reproductive process even possible ONTOP of men having civilization itself on lock.*
NOBODY is bringing that up while we’re having the “they give birth” talking point as if it’s rocket science or she has to code the child’s genetic makeup molecule by molecule to form it’s organs, which is active effort.

The pregnancy process is literally a passive, automatic sequence up until delivery. No qualifications, no skill, any NPC with the female build & fertile capacity can do it.
But not just anyone can build the Golden Gate bridge, that’s the difference. That’s actual work.
NO ONE is tryna have that conversation tho.
The only reason why pregnancy’s messy, taxing simplicity is exacerbated, is because the process is a brutal, chemical hellscape and the final phase is ungodly painful. And yet, I’m not congratulating anyone for a participation toll.
I’d sooner praise good parenting which is actual work and effort because it’s ACTIVE and not passive.
Over a painful consequence attached to a process you didn’t do for society anyway (which is the caveat to Knowles “self” point, have kids, don’t have them — people do either due to ego. Can’t escape it.)
So why should I thank, revere, let alone deify women, when the real work (raising a useful member) isn’t even done yet, if it ever gets done?
No one is tryna have that conversation, ever.
So no, Its not men carrying children, instead they’re carrying the civilization children & women use.
And women use it without a second thought as to how it’s maintained in the backrooms they don’t care to be a part of, or the underground, or WHO is doing the high-end labors (building cities, bridges, power plants, power grids, maintaining sewer system).
Women have that privilege to not even worry about any of this, not carry their weight, walk into buildings women didn’t build, to go online to chirp about what men aren’t doing, while men are indeed dying on the jobs, but women still get to have an opinion about it, as they should.
You don’t need to do the thing, to be able to talk about it —
So It’s only fair men get the same consideration regarding having children.
Doesn’t mean men are entitled of women’s birthing powers, but merely the consideration, given how much men carry of civilization themselves; and no one seems to care and yet expect everything to work properly anyway.
Let me repeat that: Men should be given the consideration, considering how much men carry of civilization themselves; and no one seems to care how much women are NOT helping with the high-end labors and yet we all expect everything to work properly anyway, while men make up majority deaths and suicides.
But WOMEN are the one's that need #Empowerment, funny how that works.
Second & most important, Women wouldn’t have to “hope” for men to stick around if the women that raised THOSE men (since single moms are so rampant now), chose better men in the first place & or raised better men that stuck around for other women.*
Why do women grant low quality men heirs anyway, and then can’t manage to raise a better man than the one that abandoned them?
Because who better to groom good men for women than women? Do women not know what the fuck they're doing?
So if women have to “hope” now, then women are failing women, all because her body, her bad choices, her fault. Women are set up to fail.
Her choices make other women pay for it. That's the price of a bad choice with her body. You'd think the people who'd be the most careful with the womb is the people lugging it around their entire lives, guess not.
All in all, agreed & yet a little off the mark.
Friday, September 5, 2025
Julie Winters is underrated (The Maxx *recommended reads*)
The Maxx, Watched the mini a few times.
I eventually read the story, some bits of the ending wasn't that well executed- the writer went to some very very weird places (not weird as in *I just didn't like it*, weird as in complicating the narrative bro was going for in the first place = unnecessarily convoluted ).
But the main issue is it was rushed.
The cartoon & first half of the story definitely holds up, like everything before #21 was/is tight.
The story after the fact is still decent but it just felt off. Like the direction/cadence, how quick things were wrapped up took a nosedive.
Just after a certain point things just took off and never came back to lead the viewers along in a more proper fashion, like the first 60% of the story.
Julie is one of my favorite mc's because of how messed up she is, she seems like this idealized, risqué hottie (the image of her *in the pink top & jeans* most of the internet knows about) but she's really got junk in the trunk. Serious baggage, not a nut case, but almost too real a person sometimes.
Because she's even hypocrite to an extent.And how messed up she always was, later we find out in the story. She's definitely not your squeaky clean feminist, holier than thou female character with a message to preach, she's as flawed as they come, with a bizarre intimate detail of some repressed trauma, insecurities (again) later on even after the show is concerned.
(There's an implication that she's bi as well, and again, the show doesn't include that because that's laaaater on.
To reiterate all this showed up way later. If The Maxx was a 2020 release, her possibly/definitely being bi would be crammed in #1 as if that matters to her overall arc.)
Her being Bi would be branded on her forehead, because that's how many youths are groomed to think that's what their existence boils down to. A very era specific misconception, the sum of what you choose to be isn't your identity: but that ONE SPECIFIC superficial trait (usually a hobby fetish, or something sexual) that's your identity.A box.
And so, that's what's done here, the opposite. Because this was written before western zeitgeist took a blow to the head.
It's an implication of bisexuality because there's a character that's not Julie...but obviously is Julie, that likes another girl.
- The fact that her adolescent "sexual curiosity" on the queer spectrum is not a defining trait of her existence but simply one of many facets of her identity (which is what that is or how that works), good execution on that front.
Did not see that coming, and that's how it should be. Some people will just clutch pearls because *queer* but for most people with nuance, it's the delivery, it's the frequency, it's the desperation to push a narrative vs the queerness being part of the narrative, which is more organic.
So being a central focal point, that's why she (Julie) works, she's fucked up, she's human.
Sara is difficult, the story gave her more to do to a point (which I was here for), but again the execution was weird, she was set up to be a major piece, then things just lost it's own plot. Especially towards the end, and I really liked her, given how she was introduced very very early as a minor character
(It's like introducing Ochako in BNH Season 1 but Season 3 forward she becomes this instrumental character that you couldn't see being any less than what she became after she stepped up to a higher echelon of importance; ofc that never happened for Uraraka but that was just an example).
Sara is very clean as an NPC then gradually came forefront. It read like OP rushed the narrative in the final stretch.
Reminds me of My Hero. Time constraints, exhaustion, boredom, idfk but the tone in the first half was solid
(Like My Hero, but My Hero was significantly worse, the whole thing was garbage but in COMPARISON to post Season 3 the first half was objectively better because there was less on the author's plate, same thing for The Maxx, sort of.)
-but gradually towards the end, the pacing and writing performance just felt off more and more until it just got clunky.
The Maxx, still a good read, a good subversion, a good deconstruction of characters and the “superhero”, still coherent in the last bit, but messy. Eccentric as a whole for the most part.