WingsOfRedemption WANTS TO START A WAR With Breaking Banquet
he's not going to church to try to sleep with her, but he's going to church to impress her because he eventually wants to sleep with her because he literally just said he's been trying to sleep with her.
*Translation: you're going to church because you want to sleep with her.*
you care because the incentive to care is you have an agenda, which is an itchy rocket that found a target
Bro is trying his absolute hardest NOT to be honest . It's when you try to bullshit and make it sound romantic or some intimate fuckery is when people get on my nerves with pursuit of women. And that's why some women can smell that shit from a mile away and make mfs wait.
*You can't con a con-artist, women are not stupid. If you're going to church just to impress her, that's NOT impressing her. Trust me. Simply walking into a building & sitting in attendance because you want her cheeks isn't impressive.* Shit's corny as fuck, to me a dude, so imagine what her take is.
You give a shit because you want to fuck, that's why 90% men pay attention to women they don't know & hand out attention that's not earned, that's why you acknowledged her existence vs literally everyone else (male & female) with a level of EFFORT you wouldn't show your own mother.
This stranger didn't earn your attention, you gave it to her because you were that easy: Typical but 100% natural. Just say that & stop tryna make it something it's not.
The issue is People get caught up in how cold that sounds, regardless that it is 100% fucking true reality and then start mentally contorting their own intentions tryna to make it sound noble or some shit.
And then after the marriage, that perfectly painted rationale you fabricated suddenly crumbles under it's own weight.
Because NOW she's not a mystery anymore and neither are you. Hence the divorce statistics. (women of God give off a different energy, or vibe), ie. Church women are different....pffft OH fuuuuck off. Clearly you've never been part of more than one church family, you'd know that shit was a damn lie.
ESPECIALLY with the older women. The only thing most church women of the modern era do, is give it away to men/women they actually want, get older & past their prime and then make suckers like him wait for it because they now they're women of god all of a sudden, and ONLY when it's convenient and AFTER they're not getting action like they used to.
Bro want to sell his own bullshit to himself. Sees a fine mama on the street, he then does cardio. Absolute fucking NPC. Zero agency or fortitude, way too easy of a male. Complete drone.
Very young on the brain, eager to create some regrets he can easily avoid, fuck ya life up with a smile on some bullshit. but at least you can say you got to hit, for whatever that's worth
This kind of dude is what Divorces were made for, he'd get burnt and go MGTOW or some stupid crap.
He'll be 3 divorces in life, and still chasing that Disney template.
Wish the video was about that tool instead of wings. 3min in, and literally i mean 3:00 on the dot, and he's getting on my last nerves. And why vent about this shit to wings of all people, like he has ANY wisdom to bestow.
Because what i'm saying right now? Is what Wings should be saying so he can help this mook wake the fuck up.
Because this is how you waste women's time, for real. Young bucks jumping through hoops for a short term release, when an older mama likely wants something real, authentic in the longterm.
Wings neglects his wife in almost every way, it's public record. So WHO in their right fucking mind shares that kind of TMI with WingsofRedemption of all people??! Lmfao Truly a moron
This is story is what Ironman 3 took notes from, the book is better, it shows the Extremis in a much cooler/graphic way. Much more gruesome detail to the serum.
Tony is shown exactly how far he'll go to get the job done, no matter how drastic it is. It's a little dialogue heavy in the beginning, some typo here and there; The villain is weak in terms of ideals, or lore but he's strong enough to have been a problem for Captain America.
Dude had a sense honor despite the contrary. Cause he could've easily ended her even before her voodoo started working, she banked on it & won.
Those women are built different to put themselves out there like that, like elite clerics, elite concubines with class.
Earlier that day she saw what he was capable of, could've snapped her in two with one hand and tamed the beast anyway, AFTER he stated he was aware of her Order's methods "tricks" lol knowing about it and being able to do something about it are two different things Feyd. Completely different.
At least he's survived, for whatever that's worth in his case. A baby girl, as instructed. The loose implication that they can control the outcome of the child's sex, sheesh, OP.
An Elite group pulling strings, manipulating bloodlines, ending bloodlines, orchestrating tragedies for an Endgame Messiah/ or other world power to arise, very subtle Hollywood, subtle.
Went in for another watch: I wasn’t tripping, this is definitely Jesus parallel/more so Anti-Christ propaganda. On the level of The Matrix, which is what this is, this generations Matrix. (also Jesus imagery/Anti-Christ/transhumanist propaganda)
Dune is worthy of that position too; Cause think about it, it’s accomplishing a level of epic the MCU took 10 years to build up to.
The failure of the Sequel trilogy. Not financially, but culturally, literary. It’s a narrative disgrace to it’s predecessor.
There’s no, and I mean NO REASON why the stakes, the action, and the characters of DUNE (movieverse) are this good when not only is Disney trying so hard to do the exact same thing AGAIN and failing —
But this is custom lore a lot of people aren’t even familiar with, this isn’t a superhero or a anime adaptation, this is coming from some book I’ve never even heard of and it’s this good? (Not a masterpiece, it’s just well made)
Both propaganda, (Matrix /Dune movies) don’t get it twisted but they’re good, except Matrix 4, that was ass.
Reverend Mother said it best:
“There are no sides”, none.
Just the order, in chaos. And if there is no chaos, well well well, better brace yourself because we’ll create a tragedy to course correct.
(Said the person part of an elite group manipulating events of the world and pulling strings, wiping out bloodlines, breeding their own followers with certain people in power to artificially bring forth a force from the “outer world”. They’re literally telling you what’s going on.)
Both propaganda, but one works & the other doesn’t (Sequel trilogy, Phase 4 MCU).
(good handful of competently executed lady characters without it being inflated that they’re FEMALE and “strong women” or some shit)
Why? because them being female isn’t their stake in the setting or their stake in your mind as you’re watching it, they’re just good characters first, people first & it registers to you as normal, not woke. Not exceptional because they’re women.
I didn’t really pay attention the first time but Florence did a good job as Irulan, channeling that mature wisdom of a leader in the making. She’s pretty smart (not in the way that modern society WANTS girls to be smart which is a Scientist or something, she’s intelligent politically and well read) and after she explained her case of the dangers of downplaying prophecy, religion & martyrdom and what that means to people wanting hope — To the Emperor. He said she’d make a fine Empress.
And he’s right. It’s easy to miss what she’s doing (actually) in the story, you see Florence ofc, but Irulan is easy to miss. That’s because the story doesn’t over-inflate her importance, when she’s more significant than she appears.
Point being, she’s a royal with a conscience (a good example of a decent person on the side of the “enemy”), she’s here & there throughout the story, being the voice of reason even to Reverend Mother, until she’s face to face, not with Paul but Muad’Dib.
Everything she said and did led up to her facing him, a force of nature of a man. Completely different animal. And both of them told the exact same thing (“Strategic alliance”)
The story begins with Irulan and it ends with Chani.
Why doesn’t the movie inflate the fact that they’re strong women? Because the movie doesn’t treat you like an idiot. That’s how it should be done.
It’s not putting them on a pedestal like many woke productions, or bending them over the couch for the sake of pandering like in Anime. Two different extremes.
Yes, Chani mentions that the Fremen way is that men and women are equal or (how any competent society should be functioning). If anyone reaches to say that’s woke? (I’m not even going to entertain that, or be smartass. Just relax. That line doesn’t mean what you think it means/ And this is coming from a mf who’s calling this Anti-Christ propaganda, so IF I’m saying the line wasn’t that deep, then it wasn’t that deep.)
Cause if you wanted to nitpick? That’s easy bait, when it’s really not.
Overall, this reminds me of Aaron Ehasz’ writing chops, how a Live Action Avatar The Last Airbender should be written.
Paul survived a genocide just like Aang but “Usul” is going in a very different direction:
Unlike Deku & Aang, Muad’Dib is not here to make friends, appeal to your inner child or some shit or hand out mercy for nothing in return.
But you’ll see what I mean. Paul is a little Gary Stu-ish (on purpose, hence the chosen one narrative. One of the signs is that he knows some of the Fremen way without being taught. Neo was a gary stu too.)
Yet the guy (Paul) still has to be taught, like Neo & Aang, he’s not perfect. He cries, he gets pissed, he doubts himself, he’s human still.)
Not a perfect little angel like Deku (who cried way too much, gets pissed only when convenient but when abused by the same guy his entire life) or unless it was time to make a CRaZy FacE during a fight. Please.
DUNE PT 1–2, Not as groundbreaking as The Matrix, not even close.
But given the fact that this has an almost 200 million lower budget than Endgame and is a better film than Endgame in story, (some) visuals, direction, writing and effects?
Worthy. (And I also gave Endgame a multi-viewing the week it dropped, 3 in fact. *never watching it again, it’s just Nostalgia-Fanservice: The Movie*)
So yes, still a decent little movie, outside the realm of conspiracy.
Part One did it’s justice setting the groundwork, which is why it felt dry or boring for some people.
It got the work done, so the second could come out swinging, which is why the pacing felt so much better in this movie, it started right in the thick of the plot. The work was done already.
The level of foreshadowing in this movie, throughout? Is insane (PT 1 too). I counted it somewhat, the most throwaway line or an establishing shot you’d easily miss or overlook as random or an artistic decision, sets up something that will happen later, or in a couple of minutes; Or the next movie, and no I’m not even talking about Paul’s dreams.
Visual foreshadowing, visual storytelling. Vision. Not agenda shoved down your throat, not blatantly anyway. If you want to sell people propaganda without them rejecting it?
Make it good & wait for them call it a “masterpiece” or something. (People won’t question what they like, because bias lowers your defenses. That’s warfare for the mind, The Matrix mentioned something similar.)
As for the movie, 2 of Paul’s outbursts in the 1st to 2nd act don’t sell for me because Timothy himself doesn’t come off as intimidating, at all.
But? When he goes Lisan-Al Gaib mode? And his speech scene in the southern temple? (my fav scene in the movie, how it began, the scene that led up to it, his stride, that shot, the MUSIC. Jfc, Hans Zimmer.)
Projecting his voice, like a godly apparition in human form. His aggression, body-language, he’s not asking, he’s telling you what’s going to happen.
The man can see timelines without an Infinity Stone, the LAST thing he wants to hear is someone informing him he has to kill one of his many mentors because of “tradition”, ALL just to speak his mind in a gathering.
Yeah, anyone would get pissed when all they’ve been hearing is “Prophecy, prophecy, prophecy” for the past imma say…(3 months toa year)
That entire scene was him embracing the role, while expressing his frustration that he had to do it at all.
He sells it 100%, reminds me a lot of Jesus roasting the priests in the temple. Same exact situation. Some other hang ups I have would be:
We never get to see exactly how Worm Riders dismount their Worms, we’re never shown how they get off. Especially how they manage to get a pregnant woman & crowd on and off one of those behemoths.
The Voice, as a concept is too broken. There should’ve been some kind of criteria like if you try to use it on someone who can also use it, it can be countered or something (Like “The Force”). Or you risk injuring your vocal chords if abused etc. It’s way too broken, you can win pretty much any fight by just commanding them to die. It’s basically Lelouch’s Geass
Paul is a sympathetic MC, he’s cool, he’s a bookworm, it’s good to see him learn something from others (to negate too much gary-stu energy), he’s like the quiet, nice kid in class. But he’s not all that interesting, that is until he transitions and he starts carrying himself a little differently. Pretentious? Sure, Messiah complex to the max, but again, consider his frustration with the whole thing. And he’s got the energy to make people follow, and I’m interested to see what he does next, that’s the point essentially. He’s not that engaging until he is.
PART TWO is worth the money because it’s 2 films in one, surprisingly well paced. But there in itself lies an issue, there’s a lot going on in just this one movie that could’ve been fleshed out. As you notice, there’s very subtle points where time-skips are implied, like Maud’Dib’s reputation, we didn’t really get to see how Usul got that reputation just that the name means something infamous to the Harkonnen’s at a point, so much so that that’s how they address him, like he’s Robin Hood or Captain America during the Civil War Arc (books). But it works because it keeps the movie from being 3 hours, but definitely skimmed over some things.
Some of the fight choreography has some chinks in the armor in the bigger scenes, like a character’s back it turned to someone who’s facing them and they don’t strike. The combat is overall solid, but that (in any movie) drives me nuts, and I saw it on my first viewing lol. But I won’t specify when or where, I don’t wanna ruin it. Because I can’t unsee it myself.
I find it very, VERY unlikely that the Harkonnen’s wouldn’t have a contingency for The Sand “Demons”/ Worms by now. Nukes exist, space ships, personal shields, hover jet packs, but not an Orbital Rail gun? Or a mounted Rail gun on a base wall? Fishy. Awfully convenient. (Harkonnen’s would have my ass in R&D because that’d be my first question to Chain of Command “What if we simply designed-”)
This is not a masterpiece, it’s a well made movie with an interesting parallel to The Matrix, very very well composed (Props to Hans Zimmer), well acted, the setting & story are interesting for what it is and how ambitious it is.
And very ominous overtones that caught my eye.
Might shill it again another time.
I recommend you watch it in theaters at least once before it goes.
If you have tinnitus or something, DO NOT brave IMAX.
That shit gets so loud it physically assaults you sometimes.
And if not, then enjoy it however you can get to it. It’s the same movie wherever you watch it.
TMI: I personally ignored the first movie when it dropped, “Paul’s Dream” OST somehow found it’s way to me via a playlist in 2022, finally watched PART ONE March 2024, then I was impressed with what PART ONE was setting up, and the sequel impressed me more —
So, If this is trying to be a Trilogy, I’m definitely going to have eyes on that 3rd installment.
Because Paul’s Dream in PART ONE regarding what Chani does to him, definitely makes more sense given not only — how uneasy she was the moment he broke off from the worm caravan suddenly to (do what he did), what he did in the temple, and how scorned she was later on (won’t specify) —
We can only imagine what else he’s going to do that (might) lead to her making that call.
And that’s an “if” because Paul says to Jessica (after the attack, tent scene) he saw his death but claims that’s not what it means.
And it also makes sense in context of the story. The knife was given to him by Chani, and to begin his journey to become Kwisatz: Paul had to die through killing another (Jamis). Killing another is killing himself. So the vision’s meaning was likely isolated to PART ONE’s plot, but it’s something to keep in mind for potential PART THREE.
It’s funny, cause My Hero spoils the ending in just the second episode, it doesn’t work because there’s no narrative point to it, doesn’t progress or fit the kind of story that it is.
Like Spider-man 2002 didn’t begin with Peter saying he’s Spider-Man, it began with a question:
“Who am I?”
It ENDED with him saying who he is, answering the question, because narratively, it makes more sense to hear it AFTER we see the goddamn story, and what he just sacrificed to be who he is. All to justify the answer to the question:
I bet you before now, you didn’t really think that hard on Peter’s question making sense to that extent until now lol. That’s how subtle it is.
Tangent: (Horikoshi copied other people’s homework without knowing why their shit worked in the first place, in context. The man at heart was a fanboy of A LOT of franchises, and you can see it in the entire story *He named a street after “Tatooine”* But his execution & ideas needed more time to mature. His mistake was getting involved with Shonen Jump before he had it figured out and or getting involved with them at all.)
Otherwise, main reason SM2002 narration works: Is because it isn’t a fantasy film with prophetic elements, it’s a superhero title and it didn’t spoil anything.
For that MHA story, us knowing Deku becomes the greatest hero contributes to nothing, because for that story, that doesn’t make sense to know it that goddamn soon.
But in this story, with visions & prophecies, all these biblical parallels, knowing what happens in fragments, works because of how the film executes it, the setting is compatible with it — hooks you to keep watching, some visions are proven right. So for the audience that gives us a sense of progress and achievement even though all we’re doing is watching, we’re not doing anything, It’s very immersive.
like J.J Abrams “Mystery Box” technique but it’s not shit.
Hence why, DUNE: The movies, so far, are already a better Sequel Trilogy than the Sequel Trilogy of Star Wars. Because like EPISODE 7, PART ONE was just 100% Set up and foundation. And PART TWO was basically EP8-9, and now we might get another.
2 ways to technically spoil events here, but 2 out of 3 example swork. Because the storytelling methodology are completely different.
MHA was just copying an aesthetic without understand why the original worked (which is why the story began promising but ended up a narrative failure)
DUNE is compatible with it because the story itself already has mystic/biblical/prophetic elements, so it’s compatible with the trope
And for Spider-Man 2002 specifically, it didn’t jump the gun before the story was even finished in the writing room. There was a long-term point to the narration and the question.
They’re not “separate” literally, because obviously people are still hooking up physically but disconnected on a cultural, social level.
“Male loneliness in a nutshell”
Depends, some guys who are alone, aren’t lonely. Nor alone cause of rejection, some ppl don’t put themselves out there, women too; so Imagine how many lonely women there are, and they outnumber men so statistically even though women are given more opportunities because they initiate less —
they also achieve less opportunities because they initiate significantly less than men (due to moronic double standards of what a “modern woman” is expected to be), thus women more likely to be alone- hence why many ask
“why don’t men approach women anymore?”, because of their failures & lack of action, because they just sit there and wait for the universe to reward them another human being.
No proactivity.
The actual situation: is more men are walking away. “Epidemic” is just a buzz word to fear monger.
The popular/accepted narrative is most women get more action cause they don’t have to do anything (laziness), action comes to them.
So in theory, if women (as a rule) don’t initiate anything, & all they get relies on someone else moving first, what are women’s chances when men play Russian Roulette less & less?
Because if you don’t have to work to get into it, how do you appreciate being in one? (relationship)
Fact is, if you EXPECT action (because out of the 2–4+billion women on the planet. Somehow It’s you, you’re special), someone else always have to perform for you & you don’t have to put anything on the table beside good intentions, and that’s the culture for you? You become entitled, useless even, it’s inevitable that complacency results in being a liability.
And if success for you is entitled because of your sex, you WILL NOT appreciate what you have with anyone. Whether it be with a man or woman.
(The women with sense don’t vary enough in number to make a difference, if they did, this article & all the others wouldn’t exist.)
Which is why not all/many bi-women learn really quick, when they go on dates with women where both of them likely to expect SOMEONE to pay or do this or that, but since there’s no man there? Uh oh, no XY-slave to carry my weight, I guess I have to be an adult and pay for my own meal like a big girl or they share the tab anyway.
Kinda like how you should be doing on any date? (And those of you who do? Well, I’m not thanking you for it because I’m not praising you for doing what you should be doing anyway at minimum, what men do anyway: Being an adult. But good on you for not listening when society tells you it’s okay to be a parasite because you’re a woman. #NoPrivilegeHere)
Point is, the “entitlement” or the preconceived notion is the male is in some way a servant or performer and she just receives. Sandbagging.
Women learn true equality when a man isn’t there to be expected to do everything because he’s “the man” but all the entitlements he expects because you’re “the woman”, that doesn’t apply to you though.
He’s not guaranteed to your body, your time etc. etc., but you’re entitled to free shit, his effort, his energy, his attention; even his life protecting you if there were a crisis that called for it.
A lot of women overlook that, because society overlooks it.
And what are you giving back to deserve any of that? Let alone a drink.
Despite my tone, I don’t hold that against women.
Why? There is no bad student. Only bad teacher.
Point being: where are women getting this idea that being a lazy, burden is dating, let alone attractive? Girls are not naturally like this, most children/little girls are very proactive, you have to coach them not to be as so for their own safety with strangers.
So what happens when they get older is we literally teach them to be entitled & blackholes for a man’s resources, but only or primarily when it comes to men and dating.
The stupid shit women are on is due to society.
“Society” as a meme & collective entails men are helping to reinforce the stupid shit women are on that makes it harder for men & boys to even navigate dating and make it out in one piece, or have peace of mind about it vs reluctance as if engaging with a damn cobra or something.
Women (in this context) don’t piss me off, but ‘that’ pisses me off.
Because most women are not raised to be humble, grateful for everything built by men that they use so casually on a daily, just for many (especially the young does with zero to little life experience) to complain about what men aren’t doing lately.
Zero self-awareness about what civilization actually says about men by the infrastructure just existing for their benefit. A systematic fortress of provision. So privileged, most don’t even get how much of a big deal that is.
And society doesn’t raise them to acknowledge any of that, that’s where most of the issue here is, lack of respect for men at minimum as human beings, let alone architects, and the woman WORSHIP cultures that ‘First Worldians’ live in.
Most women (most, not all, relax) are enabled to expect their grocery list of standards is met but they themselves don’t even match half of what they expect or think they want in a man. Which says enough about what men are getting out of it.
Think about it, back in the 40s, getting with a young lady was a major if not THE MILESTONE of a young man’s life. Women were something to strive towards, to be excited about, getting with a “Gal” was an event.
It can still be, but think about how desensitized people are regarding sex, so when the average person has like 5000 exes by 21 or pregnant by 16, bedding people daily to weekly, what does dating a girl even mean, what is it worth anymore?
Back then, a woman’s hand was an honor (at least in zeitgeist, people weren’t a vanilla hivemind back then neither, some were freaks too lol). Which is why not wanting a woman was looked at like a diseased trait. And in a bizarre sense: Women were seen as the threshold to “becoming a man”, somehow.
- (Never understood that, personally. But in a better world where women were both something good & productive / not harmful for men on a 90% metric & not radioactive and mundane. Men loved women so much that women were told, or christened to be the gatekeepers to manhood, by men themselves.)
Now it’s a growing sentiment that you’re better off as a man — without a woman, really think about that. The damage done to society since and for what?
Now many men & even some boys are avoiding the yearning for a woman’s touch, trivializing it. Walking away from the compulsion to “pursue” women’s company, because it’s now an offense to do so.
‘How these joggers are tackling catcalling | LBC’ (Britain 2025)
Women aren’t a goal anymore in the storyline of man’s life, women are filler, or the prelude to a disaster; think about that shit lmfao.
It’s not as surprising for women, society makes it it’s mission to trivialize men’s role in women’s lives down to fatherhood, and trivializing men’s lives as a whole. So the vice versa of men being filler for women: that’s normal American culture lmfao, it’s so normal many women from other countries don’t get it.
And that’s why they’re the valuable ones men in the west want and it’s a disgrace that culture is so incompetent, the men have to go overseas to get an option worth a damn. They have to run away from home to find a wife.
Because their homeland (America) has better things to do than make sure it has a future worth fighting for.
Unsurprisingly, some men are asking if women are “worth it”, depressing but I get it..
And not recently btw, this is has been a prevailing talking point in men’s spaces and it says less about them, less about women & more about what men have to deal with that led to this view.
Men are very very low maintenance, what women consider “settling” is most men’s maximum standard. Men have stayed quiet for a long time.
The images they’re bombarded with, the hashtags they’re assaulted with (#KillAllMen), the narratives they are subjected to. The constant complaining, the gaslighting, “patriarchy” this.
This new thing, “Man-Keeping”, the “unpaid” gig of emotional maintenance of a man, ie. women being in a relationship and wanting their men to repress their problems essentially, which spits in the face of women wanting men being more sensitive because men being too stoic is toxic masculinity.
Vs the unpaid burden of dealing with women’s emotional trauma dumping & tendency to vent, and complain. What’s that called? “Woman-Keeping” ? “Babysitting”? See we always have an insult for men at the ready, there’s a market for it, but we don’t prepare one for women.
We insist on signalling to men that a woman is just latin for “Burdensome parasite”, why, why do we insist on marketing women like that?
Women being emotionally needy leeches is expected, but if women have to return the same emotional consideration she expects, we label it.
We’ll ask “what have you done for me lately”, say “as he should” —
but too much effort on women’s part is considered “keeping”, so imagine the “KEEPING” lesbians perform for another woman, lmfao. Anyone ever consider that? Or is “keeping” just being a good partner, and some women want a mascot “partner” but don’t want the responsibility, so just stay single, so you’re not put out of your own way.
From a man’s point of view, or anyone with self-respect — Who’s realistically supposed to put up with that constant nationwide resentment, media outlets providing talking points to women to plant seeds of bitterness. “Man-” keeping, “Man-” splaining, “Man-” spreading.
It’s non-stop, it’s like women want to be abandoned, it’s like those type of women want to be hated. And then when men finally, rightfully walk away, then it’s “what happened to men?”
And not, “Why did we do that to men?”, “Why did we push men away?”, “Why did we not tell the people spreading this to stop?” ZERO accountability. Bunch of girls and no women.
People, your sons are not playthings for someone’s daughter to toy with his entire life.
How much are men expected to take, & we still expect them to want to play this game designed to make them the loser, we ask men to be more sensitive and vulnerable, then it’s man-keeping because a lot of women expect to be the center of emotional needs in the relationship, American women are too damn lazy. It’s embarrassing.
How much are men supposed to take, & we expect them to keep playing a lose-lose game and we not question the sanity of the men that keep playing it? Solely for the abuse they put up with constantly, are they supposed to ask for more? Like what the actual fuck?
This ties into the “loneliness epidemic” theory. So stay with me.
Really think about how tragic it is that men are weighing the “Pro’s” & “Con’s” of dealing with the women of their homeland, not ‘embracing’ or ‘being with’ American women, THEIR women — but instead “dealing with” American women.
And it’s mainly the very loud perception of American Women surrounding the actual women of America, what they’re told to want, what they’re told to think they want.
Because some American ladies have their shit together,
but apparently (again) not enough for it to be a stake in the culture, otherwise this post wouldn’t exist and there would not be an alleged “epidemic” of male loneliness and only male loneliness, supposedly. (sure, whatever you say America)
It says more about the culture raising American girls. And women themselves reinforcing the problem by not questioning any of this.
Why? because they’re the one’s society is pandering to.
Thus believing men not falling in line & following the script is something “happening” to men instead of questioning what they’re being told is “progress” is actually doing to their long term success.
“dealing with”
Listen to the language, the resentment, the burden in those two words.
This isn’t to propagandize the 30–50s as a utopian era, but there is a painfully clear difference in just the attitude, because society back then had a different attitude in just how it presented a relationship.
“Harassment”
“Men are trash”
“Creep”
“Predatory”
“annoying”
“invasive”
> “Why aren’t men approaching us?”
Most women are too confused to pick a frequency, especially as a group. They are genuinely lost, they trusted society too much with their destinies. Just as Eve trusted the serpent.
This is why women aren’t the enemy. They clearly have zero idea what they’re in the middle of. Even most men don’t know. That’s why no one knows how they got ‘here’.
Corrosive culture is the issue.
Women/Men/ WOMEN specifically are either built or corrupted by the culture to be useful, useless or a parasite.
It takes a village, because what good the parents do, can be undone by pop-culture or reinforced by the community. You can bet your ass it can and does, everyday. It’s not all on the parents, despite how lacking parenting is nowadays.
And when women are told or signaled 24/7 they do nothing wrong indirectly by blaming men all the time.
“as he should”, “step up”, “future is female” all this mess, how are they going to grow up, or evolve, or do better as people when they think they come out the womb perfect?
Or every ball is in men’s court.
‘If everything gone wrong is someone else’s fault, then I must be doing everything right, right?’
Those are the arguments articles like to AVOID just to say men being lonely is an “epidemic”, or men are being left “behind” by women, or men don’t approach because “fear of rejection”:
Okay, so why don’t women step up?
re: *crickets
Always some scripted fem-centric talking point to make it seem like it’s a one-sided inevitable trend or course of civilization, or a possible price of women gaining autonomy, Is men get buried under women’s prosperity.
And it’s a damn lie, because women would have jack shit if men didn’t go to work to maintain the infrastructure women use to be successful on dangerous jobs women don’t do, don’t want to do, or don’t even know exist because —
#ThanksMenForCarryingTheTeam , let’s hear that hashtag along with that #FutureisFemale bullshit.
You better ask somebody.
When in fact, this “epidemic” is an inflated issue that can be stopped in it’s tracks when we stop pretending men’s minimum best interest has to be sacrificed so women can be comfortable.
Males are behind in some way & women are A-Ok, totally fine, no problems here, women are actually doing too well, they’re the one’s holding everything together with no help. Honest guys, believe us, women are okay…….. *sweating bullets
This phenomenon is not communicated to people as something that can be altered or hindered: ‘Within the control of the people.’
It’s treated like an impending event that just came out of nowhere, out of control.
And when listing the reasons why: the word “gynocentrism” won’t be anywhere near that article.
And to mention that vocabulary is not saying it’s women’s fault, and even if it was the case — it being your responsibility doesn’t make you the enemy, it means you have the power to fix it. Why is that a bad thing?
And why is it when the media makes it men’s responsibility, that also means making men the enemy…this is what women need to asking.
The problem is pretending women don’t have dirty hands, ever, and questioning that fanfic is heresy.
Americans need to let go of this game of “your fault” hot-potato.
A society where men & women are united. Is a society that’s much MUCH harder to lie to, manipulate, and control.
That’s why you keep Mars & Venus separate, and if that doesn’t work (& it rarely does), the second checkmate is keep them fighting, that way when it becomes the blame game, then it’s about ego for both sides.
Thus a society united, is dangerous to people who would sabotage it on purpose.
(Like allowing illegal aliens to invade a country that can’t manage it’s own debt and then make your citizen pay for the TP that wipes the shit off the illegals ass via credit cards.
While your retired Veterans sink & drown struggling to get benefits they earned or in debt because your organization made a mistake.
America is everyone’s savior except for their own people. My heroes.)
Maintain disconnect, give women more incentive to be promiscuous, destroy men’s pride, keep them fighting. Keep men on backfoot, don’t force women to take accountability, don’t make them grow up.
Keep the lie going & control masses through confusion. Hedonism seems like liberation, but in fact the more impulsive you are, the less control or agency you possess.
Wake up. Always look under the epidermal layer of what you’re being fed by media outlets, by posters, by your favorite music artists. By people you respect.
And if you’re too plugged into your life, you can actually lose grip of what it is you’re doing with your life.
(because who wants to sweat bullets 24/7 over conspiracy, and underlying truths that the society that raised us is a fucking cesspool, like we didn’t already know that but, it’s WORSE than we thought.)
I PERSONALLY don’t want to spend every waking day thinking about it, I got shit to do and personally, I like enjoying stuff. I like seeing people being happy.
But-
Find time to plug out your bubble, unplug off social media & immerse into what’s going on around you, especially if you have babies.
Because (While I have my strong beliefs about bringing kids into this degenerating world. But when they’re here, they’re here, it’s done- ) the world you leave behind when you pass on, is a worse one they have to inherit.
Fuck other countries, focus on the world in your own homeland. In your state/region, in your county, in your home, on your electronic devices. The pocket dimensions called “Phones”. You can’t support any allies when YOU people don’t have a pot to piss in. When YOU don’t have a grip on your own people.
‘What does this have to do with male Loneliness?’
Pay attention: culture., culture, society, village, culture. Priorities of the culture. If you don’t have a grip on what society thinks is important, if you’re not questioning it, women & men are going to suffer with the basics.
Such as courtship. Ie. Loneliness. Courtship is basics of the basics, fuck that up: you’re burnt, not cooked, burnt.
So if you’re being sabotaged now? Imagine the hell your children’s children are going to have to deal with.
Which plays into the dropping birthrates, because if you don’t have kids because the world is going to hell, the birthrates cause problems anyway because you/we need people, because other nations birthrates affect the rest of us too, believe it or not, grand scheme.
And if you have a child already? Well, put money away now, make sure you have something you can pass onto them besides good intentions- If you haven’t already, and you keep your eyes on what they’re watching & consuming from culture.
Cause that’s where the seeds of corruption start, the eyes, the window to the soul. Corrupt the children, you corrupt the future.
Take the minds of the children? Control the future.
Fact is, parenthood is the solution to the majority of male /female relation issues.
Just train your little girls & boys, everyone (raises) their children, people don’t TRAIN their children anymore.
Which is why men/specifically women don’t & are not expected to exercise discipline or restraint of will or their tongue.
Hedonism culture anyone? Impulse is law, indulgence is dogma, Man is god, or goddess. It’s no surprise a lot of bottoms go online and gravitate to “goddess worship” tags, when they live in woman worship culture that doesn’t give a shit about them, they’re literally acting on a program that’s been beaten into them.
We’re raising girls to remain girls forever that corrode everything they touch for fun.
And raising Boy-men becoming harmful extremities that do all kinds of destructive crap, mainly to their own minds through fetishism, fantasy, cowardice and The Matrix. Lies. Afraid to live.
Edit (4–25–25)- And now we have this:
South Korea birthrate rises for first time in 9 years, marriages surge 2025
“There was a change in social value, with more positive views about marriage and childbirth,” Park Hyun-jung, an official at Statistics Korea, told a briefing, also citing the impact of a rise in the number of people in their early 30s and pandemic delays.
“There was a change in social value, with more positive views about marriage and childbirth,”
“There was a change in social value,”
YEAH no fucking shit, so you’re telling me, when you stop trivializing the family and stop endorsing everything else but that —
Birthrates rise because the culture / the village not only makes efforts to support family making but signals to the masses that it’s a positive imperative? What?! Who saw that coming?
Who’s been saying the culture is both the cause and key to better this change? NOT ME….
“There was a change in social value”, no fucking shit. As I’ve said.
‘The solution lies where the problem is.’
But a solution is not profitable, controversy is a business.
Peace is boring, birthrates going up because families are working and people being happy is not convenient to some some of us.
Soon, what I’m telling you here will be considered slander, or hate speech or “incitement to hatred” or “incitement to disruption of public conformity” or disruption of “public mental health”, something to make the truth akin to a terrorist attack.
Truth & Fact will become bigotry, a crime, conspiracy, offense, infraction—banned
Accounts will be erased, to erase the truth.
YouTube is spearheading that agenda right now by shadow-banning people they don’t deem “sponsor friendly” so what do you think is going to happen when they don’t deem certain voices “Public-Appropriate”.
Thus, the traditional family unit has been trivialized, by design. It’s just something you do because you can, nobody takes it seriously anymore.
Many people don’t treat sex, themselves, or each other with any respect, just casual pass times.
So marriage and children is just prolonged recreation at this point until you just drop it like another hobby or pass time, children included. I know many people that treat raising their kids like a part-time job.
I know some young people getting together without a hitch, who are happy, and have been friends for years —
Young people In huge mixed gender friend groups/ youth groups, no frequent fighting or gender wars, they do almost everything together. It’s amazing to see, not that it’s rare, but it’s nice to witness despite what we’re told in articles.
And that’s not even top 3 reasons how I know this “epidemic” is bullshit.
Like I said, people are still getting together physically, but there is some social lapse, much of it is unnatural, much of it — is orchestrated.
Otherwise, It pays more to say women are “leaving men behind”:
“Y Chromosome” is a “defect”,
“Y Chromosome is disappearing”
The Y is “shrimpy”,
Women need men to “step up”, “Male loneliness epidemic”, etc etc etc. Women are never faulty in any way, never struggling.
Language, all in the language. Frustrate men, and give women another false sense of security.
But we can’t nail why boys are offing themselves, we just can’t seem to hone in on the cause of male loneliness, & men unplugging from society, why they feel like nobody gives a shit in a society that makes it clear it doesn’t give a shit because these boys weren’t born female.
Because American women are just walking avatars of accommodation, virtue, desirability and love that even foreign men leave their own women for.
‘Because American women are in the top 3 best options on the planet, even trad Filipino women can’t compete. ‘
Said no one.
And why is that? Like, seriously, that wasn’t a dig at U.S Ladies, it’s a prelude to these operative questions:
“Why isn’t that the case? Why is it that women of America, are set up for everything but success when it comes to SUCCESSFUL interconnections to another human being/love?”
A fundamental human experience for many, a basic one that everyone (in theory) should experience at least once.
there’s videos upon videos of confused lonely women, heartbroken, begging us/ anyone to explain to them “what happened”?
“Why are women set up for failure in the present while being told the ’future is female?’“
What future is theirs, when women aren’t building the present, it’s men. And why does the future being female exclude males, if the future isn’t everyone’s, it does not exist.
Like I said: “false sense of security”
Migrant men go west primarily for career purposes, opportunities, some straight up say “money”, but “American women” is not even top 5 reasons to go to the “US of A”, some bring their women with them.
Many American men leave, even more consider it vs actually leaving due to financial constraint, why is that?
So if men on both sides of the fence are generally not interested or ecstatic of the American woman pedigree, and in many cases prefer others.
Could the issue be the men, or how the country is raising the women?
The options American men have- are entirely 1000% relevant to men opting out or being lonely because they don’t even want try to go fishing in a mountain of shit for a diamond that’s likely married already, not born yet or more than likely: dead already.
When the decent women are not common enough to be the norm, they’re the outliers, the exceptions. And if good women are the exceptions, what’s the average that men are given to choose from?
We need to ask that more, because it’s not all about what women want. Women are not the whole of the relationship, they are one of the half.
We like to boil down birthrates to what women choose to do, but women don’t get a role in the reproductive process if he doesn’t choose her in the first place. You won’t see that point brought up in these Birthrate articles.
Because even in an era where excluding men results in low birthrates, even when talking about birthrates we still make it all about women. Women are irrelevant in the sequence, unless he chooses her to begin with.
Stop. Excluding. Men — Unless it’s to complain about what they’re not doing for women. Stop it already.
I saw an article from maybe 2012 that said “Women are becoming more unhappy” and you know what?
It took all of 5 minutes for someone to make sure to muddy that fact by saying (paraphrasing) it’s a “myth” because blabla “Education” bla bla bla “Sexual liberation” bla bla “Freedom” bla bla “Childless” or the more sugarcoated: “Childfree”.
***pure damage control.
But men being lonely? OH That’s a definite fact!!! Nobody is going to challenge that! That’s an “EPIDEMIC”, as you know!
Because women being unhappy without men is a quantum impossibility, we need women to keep thinking they’re superheroes until the mask drops and finally they see the mess they’ve been living in their entire lives.
But Men? Yeah, they’re hopeless without a Missus to tell him how to twist a doorknob.
Hence the stupid dad trope, a very very VERRRRY early misandrist propaganda piece from before the century turned.
which is actually just stupid male trope nowadays.
Very parallel to the ‘dumb blonde’ trope, but much more mean spirited because some of these dads/men don’t even know how to raise their kids or get any respect from them. Because they’re like children themselves that the wife has to clean up after, and she deserves better. She, the paragon of responsibility, is raising kids & a child.
A lovely thing to put in front the eyes of children.
It’s less a statement about men being stupid and more to illustrate the illusion that men need women to function, when it’s reversed in reality.
Because again: Who’s the building the cities? Is it your #Girlpower I hear so much about? Is it The Female Majority who actually SHOULD be helping to build that shit?
Or is it the Male minority that are told they need step up? That’s actually carrying the country.
Quiet part said out loud sounds pretty loud.
Keep men beaten like dogs until they start liking it, craving it, accepting it as the natural- UNNATURAL order. Parodies of themselves, unaware to how exceptional they truly are by simply looking at cities, infrastructure, plumbing, powerlines, powerplants, children, women etc.
Men are convinced they are irrelevant, hence loneliness, they are demoralized.
Which results in horrible options for women because the men remain boys; as the women remain girls because women’s importance in reverse to men’s trivialization, women’s important is actually inflated, severely unearned ego in many American women.
And it starts with language like:
“Epidemic”, “left behind”, “irrelevant”, “defect”
Why? Again, to make it seem inevitable.
That is the point, to make men & even women feel like they have zero control over it, “shrink” their significance even; and if they’re “insignificant”? might as well “surrender” to it. *wink wink
Even though the solution lies with men and women. Simple.
Some women question it, but only after they start getting burned by it. Most of them don’t care when men are suffering, but only when women’s dating prospects thin out, that’s when most female NPC’s wake up.
We need more women asking more questions BEFORE it’s too late vs acting out, looking for other women on Reddit to pat them on the back & reinforce their bad decisions. Or pulling out their own hair to make a “statement”.
Then Men get pissed, run their mouth in return, or walk away, or being angry.
(disproportionately for many, some cats are just looking for a reason to blame women for why they choose to never leave the damn house. Never improve their personality, or at least say “Morning” to a lady in passing, if that doesn’t get him arrested etc.)
And so, birthrates drop.
Barriers, barriers, barriers. That’s what the agenda is, put up walls between men and women.
‘birthrates drop specifically in countries where female opportunity mutated into female privilege, we’re told feminism helps everyone yet male suicide rates are high in first world countries, and nobody cares because it’s not an issue inconveniencing women.’
“The Long-Term Decline in Fertility — and What It Means for State Budgets”
(Talking to you America. Your births have been dropping since the 70s, and the 70s specifically, because that was back when girls were raised to be women and not grownass children.
And men weren’t whipped 24/7 by their own homeland, no hyper-advanced video game culture coddling boys to replace reality, or to replace women with artificial abominations, fetishism, bastard effigy’s of women in Anime. Actually convincing some males that infantile dumbasses that want to be patted on the heads like dogs or sidekicks is more appealing than real women with agency. Why? Because a woman with no agency is easier to control.
American culture made a woman with agency into a threat, a turn-off. So American boys clamor to Eastern culture cartoons (yes, Anime is a form of cartoon, get over it) to digest depictions of girls with illusions of agency, because a girl that doesn’t challenge you or screams at you because you’re a “pervert” is non-threatening.
Or stuff like “macrophilia” which is the extremity of the damage ‘The Woman Worship West’ did to the minds of males.
Back then, it wasn’t a big deal, because people actually had to “live” life to an extent. If you can imagine such a thing.)
“due in large part to delayed marriage, widespread contraceptive use, and changes in abortion laws.”
-prb.org
Yes? Also education for women, but education doesn’t take 15 yrs for the average woman, so birthrates dropping partly because of women’s education is an inflated talking point, that (despite the fact that I brought it up just now)I’m actually sick of hearing it & seeing it in articles.
Because most women aren’t becoming astronauts or brain surgeons.
And the most important factor no one talks about, because it’s the actual reason:
“Sociological suggestions”, “cultural influence”, Men not bothering as much anymore. Her role in the process of birthing anything doesn’t begin if he doesn’t try. Which lessens her importance in the matter of birthrates, which is likely why these outlets will not mention it, or they genuinely lost the plot.
Sometimes it’s not about numbers, it’s about how people perceive the act of building a family, is it a priority or a pain in the neck.
TL;DR Do American women and men truly want to “deal with” each other at all ? How do they even see each other on mass?
Are they brought together in a positive light in the pop culture
how do the movies present female empowerment & are men made to look impotent next to her in the same breath?
Are they enabled to get along ?
Or disconnected as a ploy to sow discord?
Because why else would you constantly make men look incompetent because he’s next to a competent woman.
To rephrase that: Is a man’s competence & stake — the ritual sacrifice for women replacing his relevance in the story, thus (symbolically), society itself.
And women didn’t ask for that, lmfao. That’s the hilarious part.
Or the problematic overtone (that macrophilia communicates very clearly) that a ‘competent woman or a woman with any power is a threat to men’ because: men (according to these writers & fetishists) in the proximity of strong women, seems to be by default dumb, incompetent, insignificant, impotent, less than human/less than her, or irrelevant as a DIRECT result of her being realized or in control.
And naturally, that’s a lie.
So maybe we need to be stop holding it against men complaining about that and the men complaining about that trope should stop holding it against women because the mary sue/ social mouthpiece is a woman, and instead ask why writers (a lot of which are MALE/MEN) insist on illustrating that harmful narrative.
And where is that coming from inside them; that a man has to be dethroned for the woman to be exceptional or have agency or be strong.
Because unfortunately, since sex is trivial & meaningless, marriage is trivial, basically the theme of the century is “trivialization”.
Trivialization plays into the loneliness. For men & women.
Thus women aren’t a measure of gain or success for most men anymore.
They’re losing that position, in fact, It’s safe to say women lost that honor over these past 30 years.
For some, to many: women are an obstacle, a burden, a risk, a gamble, a liability.
Not all men, but enough men to where we’re talking about a “loneliness epidemic”, that says enough.
And that is a statement of the culture they live in
How much more are men expected to take exactly?
The one’s that aren’t angry just end it themselves, so how much more are men expected to take before we realize women need to get off their ass and do something besides make demands as if they have ANY leverage to bargain with.
The way you fix this, is together.
And In case it needed to be said, women’s natural design isn’t to be a liability: co-captain, a ‘necessary’ help. Anything but a “liability” or a burden.
Further more, in the 70s, men were more involved with women for the most part, not perfect relations, but involved with the world outside their bedroom door.
And when men are getting positive female attention on a healthy basis, even from society, especially from the village — then they won’t be trying to replace women with a negative or false projection of women.
Social media was void, people had to talk to each other, women had their spaces & groups, men had theirs. Men need a break from women, women need breaks from men.
“A break” is not the same as a “divide”.
But current Gen- Society indeed did break a lot of people, not all, but too many.
Broke them enough to where they felt the need to spread a fetish that paints women as pure evil, spiteful, detached, & that’s the primary iconography of the psychological affliction = misery
Hence, “Macrocreeps”.
But you know what these people are not talking about with this giantess bullshit:
The ‘psychology’, where this virus came from, how unnatural and hateful it is.
And how it resembles modern American sex relations, that’s why it’s so interesting, it’s a literal mirror of where civilization went wrong.
Via a fetish displaying toxic femininity (inflated importance, zero accountability) destroying civilization, thus the disconnect of putting women on pedestals/ above, harms men, women, & children entirely. Poetic.
And how it correlates to the “loneliness” phase, the divide, the disconnect of the sexes. The size gap itself is a divide, literal distance between him and her.
And how the origin of macrophilia doesn’t correlate to anything resembling good parenting or a good, healthy, productive experience for a child in society — or indicative of a society that gives a fuck about men’s mental health or well being.
Macrophilia is just latin for ‘“Misogyny/Misandry/Misanthropy/Hatred of people” cosplaying as empowerment, but don’t tell anyone.’ Which is why the primary iconography in some way is either women committing genocide, hence “hatred”, not healthy.
The crowning jewel of modern human incompetence on full artistic display, I give you: “Giantess fetish” ie. “Macrocreeps”
In that respect, this loneliness situation plays 100% into using fantasy as compensation for lack of living, or lack of an anchor. And just being in a relationship is meaningless, many Macrocreeps have partners & are still lost in wonderland. You can have a partner, and still not have an anchor.
If a man is raised generally having access to women who aren’t antagonistic, society isn’t antagonistic, women who aren’t enabled to be everything but desirable.
If he lives in a society that doesn’t make him feel inferior. Provides empowerment but only for her, #HeForShe, #KillAllMen, etc etc.
If the culture isn’t making women the enemy while trying to give them a fighting chance; at that point men would have no reason to not approachwomen:
they won’t have a reason to unplug, opt out, walk away, weigh the risks, quit, or invent hellscape wonderlands where women being their monolithic abusers is what they need in order to get it up.
For the fetish, some “experts” even say “explore” it lmfao, cause it’s not “hurting” anyone.
That’s cute, & I’ve yet to encounter someone who can tell me how — glorifying misanthropy, inferiority complex, regression, abuse, inhumanity, conflating women with “misery” for men, devolution, general dumbassery, glorifying abuse of children, sexualizing children, misogyny, misandry, infantilization of grownass adults, trivializing life, illustrating women as straight up evil & calling it “empowerment”— IS HELPING anyone or anything.
Nothing but crickets.
Most of these experts don’t even catch the sociological elements of Macrocreepisms.
Excuses enable it.
Loneliness fuels it.
Collective Human Incompetence created a sub-culture of human incompetence.
Macrophilia-isms in it’s raw form is how you break dogs, not how you raise or treat human beings. Which is why the popular expression is mistreatment.
Truly, a brutal rvpe of human instincts. And it also ties into the loneliness situation, the disconnect from women.
You read what you read, and then the subtext of the message/ or image is internalized in the mind, subconsciously, prone to influence one to believe something if the feedback loop is persistent enough.
It’s called “subliminal messaging”. Political campaigns exploit this, it’s an actual science. Subconscious messaging isn’t enough to influence once, so it has to be repeated.
To read or watch something however, and then the iconography is internalized consciously. That is more likely impact behavior & belief if you’re susceptible to certain imagery or lean in a certain direction prior.
Like if you’re not hungry but you see an add about food, and now you’re hungry. Same thing. It didn’t invent an idea, it steered you into a direction.
Implanting suggestions; there’s a science to cultivating a persons beliefs and there’s a formula to breaking human beings entirely and making them feel like it was their idea.
It’s all connected to destabilization, and how you got here.
And it starts with the family and leads to compromising children, sacrificing them even. Break them, from mind to even spirit. Break their will.
So, antagonizing the protector class of your species, will hurt only your species. Like it is right now.
Making women believe they deserve something for nothing will only hurt women. Like it is right now, and will continue to do so.
You’re being played. The people. Wherever you are, because this is all going to converge into a one singular convergence of Government.
You already know what I’m talking about.
‘You can’t create, without destroying’, this is a common phrase in media because this is a principle for many with the power to do it.
And they’re telling you they can, will, and have done so (many times) & all of it’s through what you see.
(Listen, don’t listen, I don’t need you to. But just keep all of this in the back of your head, that’s enough.)
And it starts with excitable language: “Epidemic”, lies.
It certainly is not as one-sided as they want you to think.
So don’t wonder why birthrates are dropping, do not be confused or wonder why. Because the “why”, well you’ve been living it your entire life for the past 30–45 years, even before you were born: It’s called “culture”, society. post 2000s-Modernity.
It’s not a mystery and it’s not hopeless, South Korea did exactly what I’ve saying was the solution: Change the culture, specifically- change what signals you’re pumping into the people.
When your village sets you up for failure, you will fail. Birthrates, recession, strife, confusion, are simply one of many failures to come.
When your village sets you up for success, more likely, you succeed.
And do NOT wonder why you fail, it’s on purpose. Just business.
If you have little ones already. You can train them to be disciplined, skilled, have integrity. But the world will still try it’s hardest to undo all of that, and it will burn to the ground around those kids as the generations pass.
War is coming, is here, and there’s no attempt to prevent it. Whether it be through our leaders or through your children-
You have been in a battle for decades but the war is coming- is here, and I’m not talking about literal “war”. Your mind is the trenches.
You’re being sabotaged.
The “epidemic” isn’t male or female loneliness, it’s western hubris that thinks it’s so progressive & enlightened, that it can take for granted what got it this far.
Privileged culture normalizing dysfunction, then blames men when cultural dysfunction from both women & men results in more dysfunction for women and men. And that’s men’s fault somehow.
“Men’s fault”
When the solution is women and men, but the only party we address for improvement or blame is men.
That’s why men’s options are so terrible, that’s why women are confused why what they were promised isn’t what they got.
And men being frustrated is why women’s options went to shit.
And that’s why women “progress” & “protest” and never evolve.
Which in fact would help men be better. Hindering men, hinders women.
And hindering women, hinders men. For the ‘initiated’, that is 100% understood, that’s key to sabotaging any civilization or social system. Destroy men first.
We’re told women are doing so well in society: education, owning real estate, careers and yet — “What happened to men?”, “Why aren’t men approaching us?”
You have everything, and nothing.
‘Things progressing for women meaning men get left behind, is women losing anyway.’
I can’t stress that enough, society lied to you:
Because think about how fucked women’s options get when attacking masculinity results in sterilized man-children and boy-men with no initiative or drive.
When has anything been solved by “redefining” it and replacing it with nothing but a hypothetical or subjectivity. that’s not a guideline, that’s a red flag that you had no business trying to alter what was there in the first place.
Men too paranoid to approach women because of what they’ve seen, lived and heard from other men.
And the bipolar message modernity sends to women that they should kick ass & take the bull by the horns everywhere in life EXCEPT dating.
Autonomy everywhere except when you date, sit on your ass and let him do everything as if your womb cures cancer.
What kind of option is that for men?
Being a pretty burden with good intentions is not an evolutionary advantage, nor worthy of procreation. (#WomenAreNotSpecial)
That’s the price of wanting modern equality while adhering to “traditional” dating rituals, only because we got to sit back, do nothing and wait for performance.
That’s the ONLY reason why that specific dating form was left alone, but everything else had to go because “progress” & “agency”. Because women got to do nothing but held the power to deny & reject. Ego kept intact. Pure genius, I’m actually impressed.
And despite that observation, Men aren’t perfect, not here to be abused, used & discarded, nor are they the problem.
Women aren’t the masterminds of this decline, & (despite what macrocreeps seem to be stuck on in their little fantasy lala-lands) women are not out to get men or be a proxy or punching bag for his mommy-issues, nor are they the problem either.
They’re both key to the solution, we have the control to fix at least a portion of the problem.
The point of “epidemic” as a term, is to paint a narrative of inevitability. Hopelessness.
Because if it’s an “epidemic”, no point in even trying to find a solution right? It’s too big right? We’re far gone, wrong.
And that gaslight benefits some people, to keep you believing you have zero control to change anything and keep playing
‘your fault hot-potato’
in your reddit subs/ & threads; secluded from challenge & real discussions, but so confident to blame each other for an issue you can both fix, but only together.
The entire point of said propaganda is to keep you fighting, demoralized, confused, arguing, questioning each other, questioning ourselves. Derail norms & standards, then ask why nothing works for you, after your tribe’s stride for “progress” destroyed the formula to make it work in the first place. Stay distracted, jaded, scorned, and disconnected so that a solution never comes to pass.
(But as we’ve seen, a solution exists, one I’ve stated, but for the west, you have so much work to do. So much damage done to repair. The obvious solution lies exactly where the problem is. To go forward, you must carefully — go back.)
