pov: Maybe if i think of myself as an omnipotent goddess to "Fee Fi Fo Goofball" my way into LaLaland, to overcompensate my socio-emotional issues I should fix. Maybe all my problems causing the problem will go away by not actually fixing the problem.
pov: Maybe if i think of myself as an omnipotent goddess to "Fee Fi Fo Goofball" my way into LaLaland, to overcompensate my socio-emotional issues I should fix. Maybe all my problems causing the problem will go away by not actually fixing the problem.
That's how Giantess ties into narcissism, to be the center of attention, the desperation to exist even if it means being a burden from feeling like one doesn't matter & being a monster is the only way one can feel like civilization will take you seriously.
And with a fantasy like that, it just tells people not to take you seriously anyway, paradoxical.
Excuses first: No, it's not okay. Psychologists have their "no harm" clause at the ready to save optics & yet no counterclaims of how it's morally beneficial, mentally healthy or evolutionary advantages of devoting sexual energy towards women enacting genocide or deifying benevolent mountain sized babysitters in La-Laland enabling regressive manchildren than grounded actual partners, men having something to offer vs being weaklinks as a virtue and for the giantess, being a burden to everyone else being something to be proud of.
TL;DR Macrophilia, like otakuism, is another manifestation of loser culture because people don't have any purpose or enough priorities in reality to feel like they matter.
So one of two things happen: You overrate your importance or you disgregard your agency entirely: aka "surrendering" it out of self-loathing to feel an illusion of security out of insecurity.
No less harming than insulting someone to their face also doesn't hurt them, does that make it okay? Nope.
"It's just a fetish, it's not an insult."
K, lets test that, according to the "Chiczilla" scenario/woman worship motif pumped out ad infinite
macrocreeps unintentionally saying: **A woman with advantage or too much power is a threat to society, not an asset, but a an authoritarian element to surrender to = which is? Correct! Blatant misogyny, and a insult to the species, trivializing an alpha female to be a burden upon society.
(Hence the trademark act of women being empowered means harming other people, including children, or just breaking shit ironically, like that garbage af Giant-Ocringe Sama manga, even when she's helping SHE HAS to break something / impose herself on the masses in some way in order to scratch that "she has the power"/woman worship/manhood crisis/ cringecel itch.)
Generational bondage of the male mind, sterilized & defanged.
Many Macrocreeps/-philes are in relationships, married, kids, etc. With the lingering mind tumor to need women to be mommy to make them feel gratified as underneath, lesser, within the authority, feel safe for being a liability, a loser even.
the gentle or neutral admiring a giant woman just standing next to a 300ft tall tree, or a normal sized chic holding something small disproportionately. Absolute Silliness.
The need ala size-ism differences is a compensation game, insecurity by design. The appeal of surrender/ imposition or imposing yourself comes from incompetence, closing a gap, by creating another.
That "part of my identity" crap Is a dependence cope adoption, in which "owning it" is misdirection to avoid saying "addict".
TLDR: "If I embrace it, then it's not a problem." That's not how life works.
A fetish isn't sacred, nor permanent. Wanting to omit your own agency & well being is not a healthy expression of anything, it's an imprint error you took pity on solely because it's sexual & thats why alot of macrophiles pretend to be dumber than you actually are.
The only natural or normal phase of a fetishes origin, is the genetics of why or how a child imprints, and that doesn't always equal fetishes- hence natural.
However, ***what** they imprinted on, is subject to error = hence fetishes.
You can dismantle it, just as you got attached to it, the process is called "neuroplasticity":
https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-brain-plasticity-2794886
Behavioral standards keep getting lowered, destigmatize everything, all is welcome, accept this, embrace that, and we wonder why people don't act their ages anymore. Hence Fionna's own behavior in a meta sense, just a big baby that wants to be a bigger child.
"-top fantasy." That one little line shouldn't be this relevant to IRL meta, it's a disgrace that it is.
people opt out of dating because adults & partners worth having are becoming extinct.
This regression can only thrive when people smile & wave and say nothing. It's not sustainable nor is it cute.
No comments:
Post a Comment