/re " LowTierGod Reacts To Hate Comments Under His Recent IG Post..." | You are not a woman

 "why is your shit private, you are not a woman"

aaand here we go with the gender gatekeeping bullshit. 'Only women can do ABC because in my isolated world I decided as such with no logical argument as to why, none.' Just pure semantic reasoning. I don't do it, so all men should do the same because i decided as such. only women can have private profiles. He says the most dumbass shit so casually., and it's lowkey sexist. Imagine it, because he decided only women should have private profiles, men doing it is men lessening themselves or stooping to a behavior that's unsightly, or a statement of fragility for a man but thats normal for women; which says what about women having private profiles? Bro is slick dissing & don't even catch himself. When all this is is he's mad because he's locked out of something & he wants to make it "be a man" situation (which a lot of ladies do when backed into a corner) because he wants to emasculate the people speaking on him. The way this dude speaks a lot of the time when frustrated I often hear from women when they don't get their way. That "you're the man" or questioning someone's gender integrity/ masculinity rationale because they can't control something in a situation. The vast majority of ppl i've ever heard or see IRL argue like that are women, which isn't a crack at the ladies in this context (despite that behavior not being acceptable for any adult) more so it's interesting listening to LTG speak on what guys do & how that looks of those men, and yet he sounds more like a sista than a brotha when he makes it about men's choices in life as a regular coping mechanism when triggered-- even down to something like damn private profile. Junior high schoolyard crap. The irony isn't lost on me, talking shit while private is funny but man or woman how is that in any way a good look? Why even take it further when the best point you could've made 'throwing shots while private' gets defeated by making it about gender for no reason but ad hominem.

Koichi thinks we should "respect" people's fetishes

 "we oughta respect people's fetishes" 

Right, just like you'd respect a tumor-- its not "harming" anyone else sure, but it isn't doing you any favors now is it? 

 A lot has been said that was stupid from Kohei's take, but that is truly top 3 dumbest & bluntly random as hell lines of dialogue in MHA as a whole.  (Horikoshi didn't write MHA:Vigilantes but he might as well have, it's the exact same level of hack & mediocrity)

And its irresponsible, because I'd say the same if it was some parental failure drooling over their computer on a booru site but these 3 are actually assaulting women in-world, and Ko-Kun is just talking to them like they're just regular salarymen too shy to talk to women and he's giving them pointers--- Which actually would be a much better scenario. 

Less predatory and creepy.    vs Giving alternatives on how to get off on specifically the panties of kids.  Enabling mental issues that they need to get fixed, actually.  But that warrants respect, cause god forbid ppl judge anything & keep each other in check, maintaining a sane society, lmfao.  

 The Main character everyone, Koichi the hack.   Deku is corny, he's boring, passive mc, he extended a hand Tomura didnt deserve but Deku never pulled no crap like this.  Such a damaging few panels, small nothing moments like this that add up over the years & DID NOT age well.  

Here I am coming to Vigilantes wanting a break from KH writing quirks, but just like MHA Smash, this author also has a projection problem.  These cats really dont understand Superhero comics no more than woke leftists. 

Either way someone is projecting some foolishness that doesnt belong in the narrative about Heroes, or whatever their definition of a hero is that week.   with Mangaka you really gotta cross your fingers that you get a writer who acts their age & writes worth a damn that'd be half as good as a 2000s Nickelodeon childrens show.

The genre really deserves better than this