The odd American obsession with a "Female President"

The odd American obsession with a Female President

“The United States is not ready for a woman president — at least not a Democratic woman president.”

“-not ready”, like a woman finally being elected as Commander-In Chief is a cosmic level convergence in the universe, give it a rest.

Translation: So women weren’t ready for a woman president. 😂

Let’s not omit the reality that women outnumber men, and many women chose Trump anyway. Some women aren’t stupid enough to vote by gender tribalism bias and instead actually read policy concerns.

Because a lot of women aren’t stuck in their teen phase & don’t vote by “girls club” rules.

“A vote for a woman is a vote for me, even when policies state otherwise or the candidate I’m voting for is a straight up lying scumbag. A victory for that woman is a victory for me, even though her life has nothing to do with mine and she put 10x more effort to better herself than I would on my best day for my own children.”

(Modern day process of elimination)

“VP Harris. She’s brown, I’m brown; So that means she has my best interest at heart even though her life experience doesn’t even begin to match mine. She doesn’t answer questions coherently or honestly, she lies, she deflects, she keeps bringing up Trump to red herring a conversation whenever she’s caught on her own failures as VP. And she supports censorship, yet for some reason she calls Trump a fascist even though she’s caught on camera advocating for Social Media crackdowns. But she’s brown so I have to vote for her.”

(Current standard of logical decision making because this “Representation” campaign was definitely NOT a propaganda vehicle to make people even easier to control by convincing them to be dumb enough to put themselves in boxes.)

See, It’s not racism if the idiots segregate themselves and call it “progress” or “diversity”.

“‘I think a woman could do a great job as president. I don’t think she is the right woman’”

There is no right woman, there is the right person or not. This sex obsession is disgusting. Instead of her being the first to do it best, its just she’s the First woman to do it.

That’s how low the standard is now.

person a: “First woman to do [insert] that 5000 men have done already”, this is an achievement for women.

Person b: Why? Did she do it better?

person a: Nope, pretty average.

person b: Then what’s the big deal?

persona a: A woman did it.

person b: oooooooookay then, so are women handicapped?

person a: No, pretty capable. Not as strong but Higher pain tolerance, weaker bone density but better immune system, how they think & solve issues is actually pretty interesting.

person b: Then why the celebration as if the collective expected her to fail, when males paved the way anyway?? She did nothing to add to the formula, all she did was join.

person a: Well that’s-

person b: Why do they treat feats of a member of their own species as a separate historical event for a group that’s part of the same species anyway, when it’s a good thing for the whole & not just them- AS IF THEY ARE ALIENS?

person a: I don’t know actually…

person b: That’s stupid.

— Aliens Maybe

“‘People still don’t trust us to lead’”

“Us” — — — — — “Us” ?

“Us.”

“Us”

this isolation language like women are another species. Stop playing into propaganda that wants you to box yourself off.

Stop being a tool playing into your downfall, which is disconnect: “Us” vs “Them” Syndrome

People in general won’t take you seriously when you obsess over superficial shit cause of how it looks.

If your main stay contribution is you’re the first woman to do it, not do it better or differently or phenomenally but just a woman that did it, don’t be surprised when people don’t take you seriously.

There’s no us, there’s only you.

“The outcome of the election suggests, to me, that our society remains more comfortable with women in supporting roles rather than the primary decision-makers.”

Well that’s an incorrect suggestion bud.

Oh “our society” is more accustomed to women being side kicks, despite the past 15–20 years of female supremacy propaganda that says they’re better. Hence not “#FutureIsMankinds” but #FutureIsfemale (How inclusive)

Whoever’s in the Chief’s seat doesn’t change that a woman who’s already the matriarch of a family in real time right now is still the one calling the shots in her family regardless of who is the President.

What does Harris losing have to do with being comfortable with a woman being primary decision -maker when plenty of people live with that reality in their own family units and working environments as we speak, with women being primary shot callers.

If it really boiled down to society’s comfort vs needs, Harris would be President.

All this #FutureIsFemale bullshit, you’d think people would take the hint that this modern pagan female supremacy paradigm that you actually live in and that women basically being god overtone SHOULD be reality- you’d think that alone would’ve gotten Harris in the White House.

Because that’s the blunt instrument of a message that Americans have been getting assaulted with for YEEEARS now.

Otherwise, what is even the thought process behind saying that beside a pathetic excuse to paint the culture as patriarchal when in an actual patriarchy #FutureIsFemale wouldn’t even be a hashtag, it’d be a parody, a fucking joke, which is what it is.

Men wouldn’t be killing themselves more than women, they’d be doing better for themselves in education and other areas along side women, as women are.

Not dominating in homelessness, suicide, struggling, occupation deaths, prison deaths, deaths in general and suffering & left behind; All the areas that’d be National news if they were instead occupied by women but they’re not, it’s just a male issue thus a non-issue to society. Because men suffering is called Tuesday, women’s slightest inconvenience is called “problematic” or “his fault”.

Systematic double standards both ground-level AND judicial, the system forgets men’s issues even exist and when they are given a platform, it’s out of mockery, antagonism ie. called “misogyny” when the men forget their place or treated with narrow tolerance and zero sensitivity.

I can just smell the male privilege from here, smells like burning ash and smoking dogshit.

You live in a Matriarchal Patriarchy, it’s okay to say it.

Stop calling it “the patriarchy” because that way you can blame men for the problems, when in reality your problems started the moment you left men behind to put women on high. The moment you disconnected the two in the culture.

It’s neither men or women’s fault, but you can control both by keeping them in constant conflict. That’s how you control a generation to eat themselves.

People overlook how sensitive & emotional people became in the past 2 decades, not indicative of anything patriarchal. This cancel culture phenomenon in itself is a matriarchal tribal attack mechanism.

America stopped being a Patriarchy years ago.

That aside, I’m further confused by this “Primary Decision-Maker” argument: Because for some, being The President, a glorified celebrity; Means you’re actually in charge as to what the masses see, how they think, what the children will perceive as reality in the culture?

Control over the banks, News, sociological narrative, cultural direction as to how men and women conduct & see each other and what signals they’re being bombarded with by pop-culture which actually shapes how people even behave for the rest of their lives?; Control over Civilization’s heartbeat, propaganda. Power.

So we think because Harris lost an Election or if she won; She’d be in charge? You think Trump is in charge? Lmfao.

The President is a title, not a statement, hence how some Business Tycoon was able to become The President AT ALL, sometimes people overlook that punchline.

To control what you see & consume in your everyday life is outside the realm of just “The President”. And that level of control is actual power, because that level of control looms over “The President”.

That’s control over one’s reality, thus society.

Because that’s how you determine cultivating a generation of determined builders or a crop of impressionable idiots with opinions, a list of micro-aggressions, and good intentions.

Raising Adults or Big-ass kids.

I won’t go as far as to call them figure heads, but your Presidents are Class Representatives of a certain “Class”. They are not “the” BOSS.

“Maybe a Republican woman would see greater success”

………. Right because the problem was Harris was a Democrat. That was the issue, spot on. 100% Correct.

Man, they’re ahead of the curve, if only she was a Republican, that’s brilliant. Why didn’t I think of that, wow!

Or maybe stop salivating & fetishizing a Pet female president cause “Vagina magic”, cause that’s exactly what this is.

I hear “female President” so much like a woman being president is going to usher in some cosmic shift in the fabric of reality, second coming tier shit. I remember the night Obama was elected, nothing changed for blacks. America didn’t develop anti-nuke force fields, the cure for cancer wasn’t released- So you cats really gave that man a trophy because he participated with the right skin color.

You’re that easy.

So what exactly are we expecting? You don’t see how condescending it is to fetishize a person in a position just because of a superficial trait and not actual accomplishment?

Why or when did Americans allow themselves to be dumbed down & infantilized this much?

I wish I was making this up, obviously that’s all people are choking on. Not her bringing America to a Type-II Civilization status, no- just having a woman’s ass in the Chief’s chair was the accomplishment. You can’t make this shit up.

Present a candidate with proper plans /policy and if that’s a qualified woman, GREAT.

Yet deifying a woman participating something men did already is not a galactic event bud.

Praise women for inventing it or making it better, not just signing up to do it too. You get better candidates when the standard is higher, not lower; the U.S military could learn from that.

I repeat, women don’t have to do anything right/ better/ or correct.

The bar is so low, just being a woman doing it is worth a badge.

You cannot be okay with this but call something else “Benevolent [this]” or “condescending [that]” when tokenizing just by being a woman or a woman of color or what the fuck she actually brings to the table isn’t even a factor because all everyone is gagging on throat deep is the “It’s A GIRL! — “ boner.

Point being: Harris barely answered any questions, deflection, laughing like a creep every 5 seconds, and in fact very rude & passive aggressive to every interviewer that didn’t go easy on her: because the train she kept riding on was just being a woman running for President again.

This is why many Americans’ national IQ averages are dropping, people are too easy.

Trump won, but the coping mechanisms/rationalization coming from detractors shows many of us didn’t learn a goddamn thing.

Your leaders truly have grounds to believe the masses are this stupid & gullible.

Praise actual merit and women/people in general will rise to the standard, keep lowering the standard, and you get exactly what you deserve.