Tuesday, February 18, 2025

/re "The Sympathetic Strawman" | The John Walker Effect

The Sympathetic Strawman - How Marvel Accidentally Created One of the Be…


7:11 Yea thats why i dont feel bad for that guy Walker offed. Never did.

https://youtu.be/SalgNl0Nnvs

(Walker was wrong but not for the reasons you think)

The terrorist just facilitated in Walkers failed execution, meaning he held Walker back in a lock so Karli could stab him in the heart. 


He wasn’t a random citizen that Walker mistook for a terrorist (which would  actually be REALLY bad) but that same guy directly had a hand in Walkers would-be death and then Lemar was killed.


  • But now this pussy has his hands up, not because he actively stopped in place & surrendered and THEN Walker attacked
  •  or the man felt bad shared condolences and Walker ignored that display of humanity & snapped his neck anyway or legit decapitated him.


No he finally got cornered after resisting & throwing a fucking block of cement didn’t work now his hands are up; AFTER an assassination attempt.  The man wasn’t innocent.

Hell he could’ve said he’d lead Walker to Karli. 

This scenario doesn’t work because this guy had a direct hand in trying execute Walker, AND these people blew up a building letting people burn to death. 


Flag Smashers get Smashed..

Hold this final move bitch.


I can hardly ever see these current MCU writers ever putting Sam in a situation like this to force him to make questionable decisions like Civil War tested Steve lying to Tony, going behind the Gov. back to find Bucky, or almost killing Stark.

I don’t see that test being held against Sam if Torres got murked, the writers testing Sam’s will.  The most Sam went through in CA4 is being told he’s not Steve, often by people we’ve never seen Steve fight lmfao. And what does their opinion matter when STEVE himself validated him personally. 

To victimize Sam when he’s clearly not a victim and in a very privileged position  .

This is why Wilson works better as a sidekick, he’s charming but he’s not interesting, not even a little. 


Walker Is flawed, has issues, has uncertainty that has less to do with Rogers and more with himself. That’s why he works better than Sam.


Walker verbally says he’s not trying to be Steve or replace him and what does he get from Sam in that same scene is  rejection, non-compliance  & in Bucky’s case: unwarranted attitude when Sam was the reason he got the damn frisbee.

And let’s stop pretending  those thugs Steve threw off of aircrafts a thousand feet in the air landed safely on pillows or something. Steve executed NPC’s too, if multiple shield blows killed that Flag Smasher super soldier, then a disk throw from Rogers definitely caved in the bones of regular humans, especially if it was a headshot .


The only difference is how the narrative/writer/director presents it. 

So that random brainwashed NPC that loki had under mind control that attacked SHIELD? Well well well he’s going enjoy going splat wherever he lands & if his landing didn’t kill someone and the movie didn’t demonize Cap for that (Avengers 2012 btw)


  • Was it right what Walker did? No, while terrorists don’t explicitly  fall under The Geneva Conventions cause they’re not agents of a Gov., they still have some coverage under basic human rights but if you’ve ever been in a fight & personally experienced tunnel vision or berserker highs in a crisis (I have)-- You know it’s not that simple. 
  • I ideally prefer he broke the bastards hands or something, or caved in his knee in and detained him for information. No, it wasn’t right how he did it, yet neither was Battlestars death right. So I get it, I’m not holding it against the man because I repeat, that dude was not some rando going home to his family.  
  •  Was it smart to do that in public eye? Hell no, that’s actually the worst part, HOW he did it. OBVIOUSLY Walker was rocked mentally due to his friend just being murdered....uhh kind of like TONYs bloodlust after finding out the truth about his parents?  RARELY EVER see anyone make that comparison. 
  • But Tony was unsuccessful to kill Barnes so he’s still a good person right? Or what about all those terrorists he slaughtered who were really just following orders of a greater evil? Oh but no one knew about that so that killing is just fine right because no one had their phones out to record that?

Ohhhh I get it now, 

Ironman doesn’t go by a level of moral responsibility of Captain America (despite killing Nazi’s but that was WW2) but post-ice Steve wouldn’t just kill someone he can easily just knock out and  clearly is no longer a threat---- 

oh....yeah....


See how stupid this shit is? It’s only a problem when Walker does it.  Realistically there’d be blood on the shield every time Steve tossed the disk at someone’s face.

It’s ok, we can stop pretending Walker was a brand new entity of corruption that never deserved the shield or now is a good person because Sam got the shield back & thus all is right with the world, which is what this was really about.

Making an example of Walker because he had something Sam wanted back.  This was never about Walker himself, this was about propping up Sam and Walker ended up being more interesting anyway.


He didn’t become a Captain America because Sam learned a lesson but because he jumped a dude, Barnes dropped the frisbee next to em (Instead of taking it himself), and he did a whack ass training montage. Vs Walker’s awards & obvious rigorous process to be called Captain America, which apparently he worked for.


Dog shit tv show, never seen anything this ham outside of direct to dvd movies that were intentionally bad.  MCU should ashamed. 

What a fall from quality.

So do I feel bad for that terrorist nigga Walker put down?  Is it april fools already cause that has to be a joke.


“It wasn’t me!“, so the fuck what? You didn’t kill Lemar directly, but just assisted in an attempt in shanking my heart, quite the innocent little angel that ain’t do nuthin.

And it’s even worse when after all the crazy crap Karli does, her minions do nothing to keep her in check, not even as friends. The show keeps showing them obviously being put off but they never do anything. 

So they are facilitators to what she does,  soooo? Fuck em, simple formula. 

Why are they entitled to afforded humanity they don’t spare for others, and they’re the one’s with overwhelming advantage. 


But Wilson shows them- specifically Karli aka terrorists more lenience & acceptance than we would spare for Walker. this guy is supposed to be a counselor of some kind, knowing Lemar was the man’s anchor like Riley was to him but his first concern was that goddamn frisbee. 

But Sam is supposed to be an example as Cap, what a joke.

Soul for a soul muthafucka, Lemar got offed by being the only one doing the right thing. 

She ran,  she saw the scene & he was still alone despite her being there, her teammate was on his own and she did not even intervene, she coulda saved em with a tackle & got him out of there, but she sat there and watched. 

Bitch made. Which says a lot about her as a leader.

Horrible writing. Walker ain’t no angel, he was only wrong for how he did it. 


Despite that forced as hell “Do you know who I am!” part the writers put in there as vindication of Bucky & Sam giving him shit, which is as the video stated: “strawman” which means basically:

  • Strawman: Misrepresentation of something so it’s easier to attack or hate, when the actual point of said thing doesn’t match up with how it’s being misrepresented. So John Walker basically.
  • Because how they portrayed him with his wife, Lemar, Lemar’s family, saving Lemar with one of the cleanest moves ever done with that shield even by Rogers standards.  And it was to save someone even tho it reduced his own defenses.

That’s Captain America. 

No serum, no convenient Wakandan All-purpose tech handouts, pure skill, split second decision, successful clutch, while hanging off a truck with one hand.


Put respect on his name.


Everything that he is actually-- doesn’t mesh organically with that sudden outburst. In fact, I’d say that was a very awkward, extremely early case of character assassination. Because how he behaves before & after that moment is not even comparable nor consistent, cause if he blew up on his wife? fine, scumbag, but that genuinely isn’t who he is.

That little moment of emotional compromise reads like justification for something else, again, a narrative having nothing to do with Walker himself. vs  him being a means to make Sam look more deserving of the mantle. A sacrificial strawman.


So what was the point of that? To justify Sam & Bucky pissing on him when they had zero information of this man to begin with.

So what are they basing their bias & resentment on? Nothing. Absolutely nothing, but him yelling in that guys face is something they don’t see but the point of that really was for us the audience to go: (Ahhh see? see! They were right not to trust him.)

  •  BASED ON WHAT? Seeing him on tv? Really? And when they met him in person he was nothing but chill. 
  •  And when he did warn them to stay out his way that was after he bailed them out again, this time out of custody and instead of thanks, he gets disrespected yet again, based on what? Nothing.
  • Who the hell is expected to just take that & you did nothing to these guys-- You think Stark or Quill would’ve taken that shit??? HELL NO.


Walker is better than me, I would’ve told them to go fuck themselves.

  • That, dear NPC, is a strawman. At worst, brutal gaslighting
  • His attitude & conduct wasn’t even their problem, he had the frisbee, that meant he was the enemy. Plain and the simple.   That was the problem.

He was not  the obstacle the show wanted audiences to think he was and people took the bait because it’s easier to just believe spoonfed surface level signals  the show downloads into you.

It worked on my ass at first, I’ll admit it, I said “Fuck Walker” by EP5 when I first watched the show. But after I finished the show, months passed and  something just didn’t smell right when I looked at him from a distance. 

  • There was more development going on with Walker than Sam but SAM is the favorite to be Captain America?
  • In fact Walker went through more changes than Sam in even Brave New World but SAM WILSON should be Cap? Why? He’s boring as shit.


“Fuck Walker“ ??? ...Huh? What exactly did he do ? When SAM was the one that gave up the shield after Rogers passed it to him.  Disrespectful ass. 

Walker nor Bucky would have ever done that.


But “FUCK WALKER”? HOW?!

So that moment of epiphany is when I woke up & realized the truth. Sam & Bucky were barking up the wrong tree on purpose, Sam was the reason Walker got the shield but Walker is the problem. Why? Cause the show said so, nah, not buying it. 



So much could’ve been accomplished and avoided if Sam & Bucky just worked with the guy. & Lemar off jump.  But the show won’t hold them accountable for that on their part, It’s whack and dishonest.


Walker was a means, nothing more and nothing less.

Friday, February 14, 2025

Ruth Bat-Seraph should've been enhanced (captain falcon: brave new whomp)

Watching Ruth's (Bat-Seraph) little self take down grownass men at 5ft2 is some of the funniest shit I've ever seen since Home Alone 1



They really thought her being an ex-Widow was going to explain that shit😂

How Nat fights leans into facial strikes to stun, nut shots, knee strikes & that body spinning bullshit to disorient the opponent.

That's how a short woman could POSSIBLY pull it off, like ScarJo, she is not that much taller but she knows how to sell it better.




Grace from Dark Fate is someone I can see selling beating a dudes ass legitimately (because she's trained, lean & tall)

And she's enhanced, which is what Ruth should've been. If they insist on these shorty women ragdolling grown men, please make them enhanced, PLEASE.

And I called it after her first fight scene, I knew they were going to make her a Widow. But I was HOPING she was cybernetically enhanced or something, (because why not, plus you'd get brownie points for the PC sponsors, badass woman and prosthetics? Easy pandering- you're dropping the ball MCU)

I still shake my head that we never got to see this character (& her peers) fuck shit up. Instead we got Karli's corny ass.


The movie's action is ass overall, the scene where Sam & Torres find (you know who) OFC the guards don't have guns because then the movie would be over. Red flag # 1

And how they (2 grown men) beat ALL THOSE guys with armor, helmets/padding + charged batons, without enhancements or powers was also Grade A+ 100% bullshit.

Then her little ass shows up & then the real comedy begins.

Sam's suit should've been exo-skeleton from day 1 (vibranium cloth is not the same as actual armor) and Ruth should've been enhanced, I couldn't believe my eyes at the White House scene but that corridor fight was just too much.

Thursday, February 13, 2025

Lightyear is Beyond Infinitely Stupid


gay couple sprinkled in a kids movie made in the 90s, likely

The movie was basically Hawthorne's, ngl. Buzz was the side character, she had more thematic presence and significance than him lmfao.

That was my biggest issue, Hawthorne as an entity hijacking the damn movie.

the gay couple was just eye roll worthy, not even worth complaining about, it's predictable. The west insists on reminding the 99% that the 1% exists, my heroes

another company too scared to commit to what they INSIST on shoving down your throat as if Gays are 40% and up of the species, scared to death of China to not subject their audience to halfassed diversity, but not scared enough to not insult America's audiences with it.

It added nothing to her character, and ofc she was a side character so whatever queer they would flash to the audience like a limp dicc it would be brief anyway, so bold, so brave.

Her being gay is irrelevant as a criticism and to her actual character, which is the problem with it.

Not impressed by the movie or OP's double virtue signaling, if someone didn't like the movie because of the unsubtle propaganda that doesn't even work in meta or in context and adds nothing to the woman in question- that's their business if that was their reason not to like the movie

is it a good reason??? no but i'm not going to berate faceless NPCs to grow up like im making the world a better place by shooing away people who dare to have a preference

It's not that deep, on both sides.

GO1 vs Sonicfox (GRAND FINALS) | Red Bull DBFZ World Tour Spain


13:33 Go1 godtier counter
6:41 Sonicfox godtier counter


both these guys are something else

Saturday, February 8, 2025

Teenage mutant ninja turtles out of shadows raph and Leo argue

one of a handful of gems in that mess of a movie, just let the turtles own the scene & you get good content

I fancy Raph's Yorkie accent

Zombie Movie | 28 Weeks Later | movie reaction | reaction mashup | first...


Alice made her choice. She made the moral decision and got lucky because of one out of a million genetics. (because plot)

But realistically he made the smart decision and lived.

In a world like that morals keep you sane, but it also gets you killed.

Principles vs preservation, one should not be abandoned over the other but neither is useless.

Friday, February 7, 2025

HULK Vs. SAITAMA [REMASTERED] Fanmade Animation - Taming The Beast


 Just the first shot is better framed with aspect ratio bars, you added a glow to the hole in the wall, better quality. Bigger debris on the ground, bro just the FIRST FRAME of the first shot already is an improvement. 

Thursday, February 6, 2025

Why Jurassic Park Needs To Be Scary Again (it needs to be horror)


4:48 "might is right, true violence, and true primal rage." Beautifully stated. And yes, thats what i need out of this franchise and the only way to do that is to stop treating Jurassic park like a theme park ride or a promo for a ride and treat it more like Jeepers Creepers 1,or the bug pit scene from King Kong (minus the plot armor) or The Descent, sheer terror. A world predating Pre-Human beings misconceptions of acceptable, Dinosaurs spit in the face of that, at least the carnivores anyway. The issue is the movies got hijacked by PETA sensibilities. This is why the movies corny habit of only killing off NPCs or "bad" people really turned me off from all the movies save maybe for the first. Trying to insert convenient righteousness in a situation where Dinosaurs have no moral compass conflicts with what these movies could've been in terms of sheer horror or showing how serious the situation is. Not showing us Roland go toe to toe with such a world was the missed opportunity this side of the century for the series.

The Lost World: Jurassic Park (1997)| Full movie reaction | reaction mashup (Roland Tembo is painfully misunderstood)


Their reactions to Roland is so melodramatic, in a civilization full of tamed monkies that fight for nothing unless it’s each other but complain about everything, few of them can relate to this man who seeks to live through the hunt, a man thats in touch with his hunter genetics.



Too many softbellies, at least the lady on the 2nd to bottom right sees he's not all bad after he checked on Sarah. 

The guy wasn't bad at all tbh, he doesn't apologize or crack jokes, & he hunts animals they see as cuddly Pokemon or something.

I guess their MCU groomed sensibilities aren't compatible with a personality like his. Roland is awesome, rip to his homie Ajay.

Roland had a code, he had someone he cared about, cut throat leader but didn't put anyone in danger, he STOPPED Peter from endangering the camp and could've saved everyone including Ajay if that photographer didn't sabotage his gun.

I hate that Roland never punched him in the face for that, everyone that died because Rolands failed shot is on that guys head and the movie never holds him accountable for it and because the movie overlooked it 95% of audiences miss it as well.


I hate that even to this day.

Sunday, February 2, 2025

a generation of boy-men raised by women (Fight Club 1999) quote

 

Tyler: Durden: My dad never went to college, so it was real important that I go.

Narrator : Sounds familiar.

Tyler Durden : So I graduate, I call him up long distance, I say "Dad, now what?" He says, "Get a job."

Narrator : Same here.

Tyler Durden : Now I'm 25, make my yearly call again. I say Dad, "Now what?" He says, "I don't know, get married."

Narrator : I can't get married, I'm a 30 year old boy.

Tyler Durden : We're a generation of men raised by women. I'm wondering if another woman is really the answer we need.



men don’t walk out randomly for no reason after generations of nuclear families making it happen and women aren’t just itching to chase away men or be abandoned because that’s so fucking fun.

The issue happened in what society (collective human) itself thought was a priority and what it saw as trivial or outdated, and then people naturally picked up the vibe & gee, I wonder why dysfunction is the reward?

Who the culture put on a pedestal, telling them they can do it all & have it all as independents, even though they’re not the one’s building the cities, so in reality they are dependent but not powerless. That’s what people miss.

(Conflating dependence with powerlessness.)

(No different from how Katara is dependent on her friends but still powerful as shit- Dependence is not a weakness if it’s mutual, that’s how teams function. If one person is dependent and the other is not, parasitism can happen, one person is doing more work than the rest. )

Deifying one side and then left behind the other side to decline, incomplete cultivation, confusion, perpetual boyism and in many cases: willful self-destruction to escape from living, in whatever form that takes.

Escapism, decline, regression, devolution, fetishism — 





Ongoing boyhood. No Men.

And while the former side is being empowered, EVEN THEY still get systemically mistreated and violated. Thus also in decline.

So nobody wins. Nobody.

And then this society thought everything was going to work out just fine with all this disconnect spanning decades, lmfao, that’s not how that works.

The Future isn’t Female when females aren’t the one’s building the very foundation of the present nor are they dying for it;

The future belongs to the whole or it doesn’t exist.