Some will “this is fine”, others “it’s their site, so why not”
It being their site is irrelevant, the site is nothing without our engagement. Just because they can, doesn’t mean they should. Period.
This censorship movement is just getting worse & worse & worse in real time before our eyes.
YouTube has the same exact issue, these sites think they have to be the Authoritarian State of righteousness at the expense of people’s fullest experience ie. being able to actually enjoy the site’s good, along with the bad. A diverse experience.
Because what’s going to happen is they’re going to keep adding more and more criteria, moving the goal post here & there until no one is going to be able to do or say anything unless it’s one narrative and one narrative only.
That’s how fascism operates, the worst decisions ever made usually begin from good intentions. Censorship on a creative platform is just asinine.
You go out of your way to protect people, you’re not helping them. Shielding people from things they don’t like is going to make them ill-prepared for the situations if they have to deal with it in real life — on an emotional level.
You’d be surprised how many people just pull out their phones to supplant a reaction in a crisis, or just freeze up or don’t know how to process it because they’re so used to being kept in a crib on social media where everything is amazing & “inclusive”.
Same with Reddit, same with YouTube, etc.
A culture like that cultivates weak people, the effects of social media on our psychology in real-time is not a joke, it’s a real phenomenon.
True Inclusiveness includes negativity, hence Inclusive. You don’t simply redefine what Inclusive means to be strictly urban dictionary because there’s a specific group or 2 that you want to feel exceptional: That’s what this is really about.
Conspiracy theories that are unfounded and claim that certain events or situations are carried out by covert or powerful groups, such as “the government” or a “secret society”
Moderate harm health misinformation, such as an unproven recommendation for how to treat a minor illness
Repurposed media, such as showing a crowd at a music concert and suggesting it is a political protest
Misrepresenting authoritative sources, such as selectively referencing certain scientific data to support a conclusion that is counter to the findings of the study
Unverified claims related to an emergency or unfolding event
Potential high-harm misinformation while it is undergoing a fact-checking review
Very convenient. So with that said, “misinformation” is whatever you say it is, or if a certain entity or two decides they want you to silence someone who’s talking too much, you have it in the rules that you can shut them up by just labelling their speech (factual or not) as “misinformation.”
Very VERY convenient clause there. Because as we all know, the only reliable source are the one’s controlled by the powers that be, that’s never gone south ever in human history, only the branded corporations with clear bias & political leanings: Are the one’s you should listen to.
Right.
Not Inclusiveness, exceptionality. Emotional preservation. A bubble. Control.
To exclude an aspect of an experience because you “feel” it’s harmful is admirable, but it’s not diversity.
Diversity is broad expanse of different experiences, if you’re censoring because you want people to experience what you want them to, according to your own dogma, that’s not diversity, that’s an echo chamber. A singular digest.
I’m glad they’re not just breezing past her trauma after she came back (TOOK WAY too damn long to get here), but they’re really milking this (Casca can’t be with Guts) shit.
Come on man, you’re only going to waste time you could be wrapping this story up instead burning chapters on melodrama. PROGRESS the story, I think the plot has waited long enough.
You can address her psychological recovery without having to stomp guts in the balls for no fucking reason.
Horikoshi rushing because of deadlines, Berserk’s issue is it’s dragging it’s balls on the floor. The complete opposite end of the spectrum.
I'm telling yall, soon as Google bought it, YouTube became a prototype for dystopian simulation.
They're testing fascism on us on a small scale, to see how much they can get away with on a larger scale, mark my words man. The fact that most of us WON'T leave (including me) because there aren't any equal competitors is partly why they'll keep abusing us.That's part of fascism, controlling competition, and keeping people in a box. It's all part of the mind game.Because let's not forget how much corporations & entities harassed the original creators of Youtube until they finally broke and sold it just to be free of the stress.This is how they operate, they remove options or alternatives & break you or erase your presence.
---------------Just in case, ya'll can find some of these videos on Rumble, Reddit, Tumblr, Odysee, Pinterest, Vimeo, 9gag, Bilibili, etc. (I'll find other sites/ And in the mean time i'll start to post only my better videos that I personally am attached to)example: She stopped shoulding herself (the edit that changed the direction of my hobbies)Ie. I got backups for my projects just in case Youtube finally lose their damn mind and stop pretending that they give a shit about this community.
So if you need perfect, I'm not built for you (Yeah)
yet between men and women only men are expected to DIE for the other.
Not that she can’t, & some women do actually, but she’s not expected to. The pressure isn’t on her.
So i’m pretty sure that warrants men being picky or being able to “choose” what they want in women, cause at the end of the day its just his LIFE right?🤨 Who the fuck is he to pick & choose what he wants in you when in the same breath you’d like to feel you’re worth living/ & dying for.
Can’t have it both ways sis.
It's not even about perfection, it's compromise, something women expect men to do all the time when it's convenient for her.
Doesn’t mean you have to change, doesn’t mean what he thinks he wants- he’ll get (& vice versa), but yeah he can pick and choose.
Women have the luxury to forget that a man stakes his life when he gets involved with a lady, some guys die for women they don’t even know. It’s soooo easy to forget that when you’re not a man, not the protector, and that burden isn’t on you.
You’re not incriminated if you overlook it, but just keep in mind how easy it is to OVERLOOK it while you’re holding that grocery list of all the things you might feel you’re entitled to of a man because “he’s the man”.
Cause when a shooting happens, a building comes down, or something pops off, and your mortality sinks in real fucking quick — and it’s not you who’s expected to take bullets if necessary.
You naturally expect the male to “step up” and do the thing. Rightfully so, but don’t then take agency from his preferences because that’s more convenient for you, when things are peaceful and society tells you you’re the center of universe.
Even the BIBLE mandates a man sacrifices his life for the wife. (Not a girlfriend, his wife, his honor. A wife is ENTITLED to his life, & vice versa)
SO with all of that said, between men and women, a woman gets to pick & choose because she’s going to be bearing the children (that’s how she gives her body & for some that involves fatality), and he especially gets that privilege because he’s expected to 100% die for her & the kids, AND PAY for it all if he doesn’t.
Doesn’t get any more serious than the bastards LIFE. Yes he does get to pick & choose. Especially the husband.
Does that mean change yourself? Well that’s a personal decision if you feel they’re worth it, because even then: How many women go through life thinking men should change for them; if he “really loves her-”, he should, right? Or she can “fix” him.
But not the other way around right?
I’m noticing this attitude that a man changing for a woman is romantic, but a woman not changing for him is empowering, that shit’s not it bro.
That’s how you fuck up with the little things, plant seeds of hubris, ego and entitlement that will burn a lot of bridges that could’ve lead to your happiness..
And it all starts with double standards.
I like the message, but at the same time, be careful. Don’t overlook the simple things, men are too used to being told they shouldn’t have standards or a choice. Don’t take fellas for granted, it benefits you now while you’re young, but it’s gonna bite you in the ass.
And by that, that doesn’t mean you’ll end up alone. But don’t think just because you’re not (by yourself) for the rest of your life: Automatically means you’ll be happy, it doesn’t. Hopefully you don’t find that out the hard way.
Be vigilant, have standards (cause this ain’t Build-A-Bitch or CREATE-A-Sim, you’re not here to be molded by some boy’s/girl’s whims, make sure they’re worth it to begin with), but (for the love of god) be humble.
Society sets you up for failure making you believe your choice, and what women want is the only thing that’s relevant in a situation that involves TWO people, that’s bullshit, and a dangerous attitude to have.
Otherwise, the beat is funky tho, it reminds me of Selena Gomez’ songs around the 2010′s, i miss that era, i miss that Youtube.
Veggies before Dessert, let's get this out the way:
DUNE PT 2 is Blatant propaganda, I'm probably not helping the cause by spreading it/recommending it over & over again but ignorance is the greatest weapon of the powers that be use against the "cattle".
But in reality, you NOT seeing it actually the worst situation, see it, see Barbie, see Oppenheimer, see "They Live", SEE, witness and know exactly what they're coding into these movies. And have been for a long, long time.
Civil War? That's too obvious, obviously they want us killing each other. And what better way to plant the seeds than a movie where there's a line where one asserts "What kind of American?", just dangerous DANGEROUS language.
They clearly want us separated, and at each others throats. While they're united in their agenda in controlling the masses. Because notice how Americans are never afforded any goddamn peace? There's always something wrong lmfao.
No Gov. efforts to get our birthrates up, nothing. That's not an accident.
They want to abolish the America as a metaphorical EMPIRE, to raise up the ONE WORLD Organization. That's all that shit's about.
Letting Aliens in, they live on our tax dollar, almost as if to ACCELERATE our economic collapse on purpose. Almost as if that were the plan, create problems and fix nothing. And make more promises.
(They Live 1988)- The Matrix 1999: Modern world as you know, predictive programming. The elites, The Machines controlling your system
(DUNE PART TWO?): Anti-Christ, revolution. The prelude to nuclear war
(Oppenheimer): WWIII.
(Barbie): The world after the war, sterilized, gynocentric fake. Men are bastardized husks of actual Men. Simulation.
Do not get swallowed up in how it sounds or looks.
Reverend Mother said it herself.
"There are no sides."
See, Witness and know. But They do.
OUTSIDE OF Conspiracy.
Dune PART TWO by itself?
A well produced, well made film.
Though it is longwinded aka long as shit.
bonk bonk bonk
Well made, well composed, well acted, sound design is solid. The writing was satisfactory, well paced (Mainly because this movie is a direct sequel); More so better than LAST JEDI ever accomplished for me, that was also well shot, but trash. DUNE Part ONE did the slow-pacing storytelling work to set the groundwork so PART TWO could bring the thunder, and it brought it mercilessly. Too damn long, but the pacing is way better than Endgame despite the length. And ironically, it's impressive that this franchise has custom lore that most ppl (including me) weren't that familiar with, and it's this well executed, so far anyway.
Paul is ok, he's sympathetic enough at first, an awkward-nerdy book worm, good fighter, someone plain enough for the audience to project onto, he was a good boi; A shonen protagonist.
He reminds me of (Matrix Reloaded) Neo, a bland slate mc, deadpan most of the time, visions out the ass.
He didn't really leave a major impression on me in PT1, his outbursts don't really sell me, he's not intimidating, but he was a good kid, he was learning, and in pain; Bro lost a lot. PART ONE was the boy being set out into the wilderness, away from home, robbed of his father.
But his transition, that was good. Timothy sells it effortlessly. Lisan al-Gaib is a serious mf: SOLD
Paul was the boy. Muad'Dib was the young man. Lisan al-Gaib is the MAN. All Man.
In a weirrd way, it's make me realize how much of a wasted opportunity it was that NEO in the Matrix didn't take after Morpheus and didn't really "lead" Zion in any way.
It makes sense why he chose Trinity over Zion, because he wasn't attached to Zion. Not even a little bit. How long was he there? A few days? He didn't connect with the people, yeah he talked to a Council member but because the Elder came to him. Neo didn't seek to know their ways or anything, to know the people that he's "delivering" out of a century long bondage.
Unlike Lisan al-Gaib who is integrated with the Fremen, he earned his keep, they know him, and respect him. He leads them because he made it his business to respect their ways and know them.
Neo? Didn't do that lol, thanks to seeing this movie and better executed THIS version of the anti-Christ is playeed out, now I have a new grip with the Matrix Neo character lmfao
Whoops?! Lol
Now. That's not to say, Neo is worse, because in context. Paul was a Prince, he was raised to eventually lead the Atreides house. Vs Neo being an introvert, no leadership skills. It'd be weird for him to suddenly step up as a Steve Rogers personality for no reason.
But then again, Steve wasn't exactly a purebred prince himself, sometimes in life, despite comfort zone, you have to step up and be that figure when it's necessary. Hence Captain America
How you started. Is not what you have to be forever. The difference is you deciding not to be.
But it definitely makes Paul look better lmfao, more legitimate.
The Zion people didn't trust Neo, they didn't know him.
The Fremen know Usul, they follow out of trust and respect. It's why Stilgar asks what's in store for them, on behalf of their people-- he asks this boy he once mentored, what is in store for them all.
"Lead them to paradise."
DUNE 1-2 is pretty much a more tightly written The Matrix 1-2, we'll see how it stands as a trilogy, eventually, possibly.
But Part Two is the boy becoming a man, in more ways than one.
This movie is when Timothy shines a little more, he knows how to sell a Messiah figure, my biggest worry was he'd be cringe when he "woke up" but he actually reminded me a lot of Christ, triggered Christ-- that southern temple scene was nothing but Jesus checking the Pharisees, same exact energy-
Same aggression.
To reiterate--- Ironically, it's impressive that this franchise has custom lore that most ppl (including me) weren't that familiar with- it's not a superhero movie, it's not Star Wars and it's not all that mainstream and it's THIS well put together (so far)??! Not bad. (EPISODE 9 Rise of ScumWalker eat your heart out), PART TWO is very close (but not precisely because Thanos was next level) but not that far off from achieving a level of epic scale that it took the MCU 10 years to achieve.
Main Gripe #1: And this is one is exclusive to the movie, the not the book-- THE MOVIE.
--- How the fuck do they get off the Worms?
And more importantly, how do they manage to get a pregnant woman on a worm and how the manage to get her off. The movie never showed that. It came to mind after first watch. These worms aren't Elephants, they don't seem to stop when in motion, they're like Sharks, they must move.
And the only way to get on is while they're in motion, specifically in motion, so how they managed to get off by the same principle (with a pregnant woman) is something my brain meats ponder, as far as the movie is concerned. Obviously there IS a way, hence how Jessica got to the temple or how anyone dismounts the worm at some point.
(And the fact that in PART ONE a Dune worm stopped in front of Paul & Jessica, so they can stop)
So it's not immersion breaking, just a thought. They might dangle off the side and just gradually descend, but again, pregnant Jessica lmfao. Somehow they must be able to get the beast to halt with just those two handles.
Gripe #2 : *If Sand Worms for the Harkonnen are a known problem, why haven't they cultivated an orbital weapon to take care of them?
They have space ships, hover packs, energy shields, **SPACE -SHIPS**, some kind of needle gun tech, Fremen use blue beam weapons, but no Rail-Guns or Macro-Needle Gun installed to deter or kill Worms? The HARKONNEN of all Houses would/should possess that tech. I could definitely see them using like a Decibel Concussion-Cannon to blast some dubstep so loud it's a weapon of mass destruction to scare off or hurt the worms. (But that's probably a bit outside this universes technological capability but a big needle rail-gun for sure.)
----------
Muad'Dib
See like My Hero Academia, this modern DUNE is spoiling the story in a lot of ways even when you don't realize it, but unlike My Hero, it's done right. The information is given in pieces, fragments, like a dream. And even the most minute detail like Paul & Chani looking at Muad'Dib in a vision or the actual mouse encountering Paul the morning after the attack in PART ONE or Muad'Dib bugging Paul while he was trying to hide before the Harvester raid.
Something simple like that foreshadowed Paul turning the name of a simple desert mouse into a title of infamy that even the Harkonnen dread. A little mouse that can derive water from the desert, resourceful, a survivor.
This shit is well made, it ain't no masterpiece. But it was definitely the closest thing to genuine epic scale "Cinema" (without bullshit or contrivance) that we've gotten outta MCU since Avengers: Infinity War
If someone has to approach you for something to happen, every time?
Maybe Men shouldn't have been made to carry women through the dating process in the first place.
Complacency is laziness, Why is it you get to be lazy and men HAVE TO ask you like you're a first class citizen above males
See that's the conversation we need to have.
Not feminism being the reason why men don't ask, the question is WHY DID IT TAKE FEMINIST propaganda for men to wake up and refuse to be tools anymore.
If grownass adults need you to approach them like you're here on this planet to serve, maybe thats not a game you should be playing if the traditional rules say majority of the risk is in your court, but only if you're a man.
_It's soooooo easy for these women to ask why-- when they risk nothing of their ego, when all they have to do is sit back, look pretty and wait for opportunities to come to them._
Earning nothing of a mans time, and expecting so much. And boys are taught just handing over their attention is how its supposed to be. You're supoosed to crawl to her like a dog & pay and pay & pay & pay.
Woman: I'm not GOING to meet you in the middle, why WON'T you come TO ME?
Thats a parasite. Not a partner.
A grownass child you have to babysit with your wallet, not an asset to cherish.
If she NEEDS you to approach, you're babysitting someone's child, a girl. Not spending time with a woman.
When you hear women complain like this, that means they're letting you know they have some growing up to do. Stay clear.
That's not feminisms fault, that's actually a good thing. Why in the fuck would you ever play a game where the rules intrinsically favor one side over the other, and then blame feminism for freeing you from being the made the fool & after being taught that being the fool was how it should be- only if you're a man.
That's not a game, its not courtship, actually; its a punchline. And the joke is any man that signed up for it.
7:55 / 9:00 Are the highlights, the juicy parts of what's going on in propaganda media. From your movies, misandrist conditioning, etc.
The decline of culture, sabotage is never instantaneous, it's a slow burn, a slow infection to poison generations. A slow knife- the patient blade, that infiltrates your ads, your tv shows, infects the minds of girls, and derails the minds of boys:
The slow knife, cuts deeper. The slow decline, the patient sabotage, is what brings down Empires.
The core of fanservice is exploitation for audience retention, for some it might not have "been bad" to see her bent over for no reason beside the fact that she's not ugly.
But to exploit a character solely because they're attractive, thus commence "fanservice" ie. sequence of events to reduce them to just a hot piece of meat in circumstantial situations geared specifically to further reduce them to a sex object---- Doesn't help them either.
Characterization builds character, fanservice takes away from them or does absolutely nothing for the character but dehumanizes them.
Because it's FAN+service, not CHARACTER+service.
And true fanservice? In reality is reference, through-lines, easter eggs, that's fanservice.
Stan Lee's cameos throughout the years, that's true fanservice. Anime/manga, predictably has this degenerate context where fanservice in anime specifically means a character (mainly FEMALE, ofc) gets bent over the couch for some instant gratification dopamine fixes, meaningless.
Basically Anime & manga has hijacked the term fanservice to mean "Sex-ploit characters for no reason, at any cost even at the expense of the story and character in question-- ya know, for the kids"
ie. Consistent Cockteasing is considered fanservice.
I hear what they're saying. But let's be frank, for some it wouldn't have been bad, but what good would it have done Dianna? Absolutely nothing. That's the point.
Her being attractive, is enough.
We, fandom/society/culture, have to learn not to exploit what we admire, just because it activates monke brain.
We don't have to ruin everything we touch just because it wouldn't hurt anyone.
And that's precisely why I respect the restraint on part of the writers, Turn A Gundam has fanservice, but for Dianna? It's especially toned down. And it further helps how seriously she's handled, and I can watcher cuter, lighter moments without worrying about an obligatory shot of her ass, crotch, or chest for no reason.
I can trust this show to know what the fuck it's doing without treating me like an idiot who has no other incentive to watch a show beyond the basic-minded factors. I like shows that take itself/ thus me/ we the audience, seriously.
Perhaps given the fact that her twin (Kihel) was a stand-in for the other "fanservice" moments and there was no point in doing it to Dianna when you already saw Kihel. Whatever the case, Dianna is more so solid because the writers (in an anime no less) respected their work enough to know NOT to do it.
Wouldn't have been bad, but it wouldn't have helped. Because it never does.
aaaand yet Deku is curing or subsiding Tomura's lifetime of trauma by literally punching the darkness in his heart away to free his inner child or some shit. So what the author made fun of or addressed as a cliche, he's subscribing to in the Finale of the series anyway.
"Self aware" my ass, the man is a hack. Good guy i'm sure, but he didn't know what the fuck he was doing. The story is FULL of references from better shit, dude literally has MARIO in the story as a Doctor. A street called "Tattooine."
CLEARLY Kohei is a fanboy of western ideas but did not know what he was adapting when he copied that homework.
That's like ridiculing the color blue, but the visual motif of the entire story is blue anyway. You're not a genius for pointing out the trope exists, you get props for doing something different FROM the thing you're referencing as a bad thing or at least try to expand what you have.
So far, the movies have done a better job treating deku as the main character than Horikoshi's himself.
Episodic Impressions: My Hero Academia (episode 40)
"It's their culture-" *I love that excuse. Weak as an arthritic kneecap and yet people repeat that same non-point over and over again as if "CULTURE" is an argument.
Different culture makes sexualizing minors okay, meanwhile, you're justifying another "culture" while having nothing to do with the paradigm you're defending, so what's your basis of defending a world you're not even a part of.
And it's not even "culture", it's Legalization. Which is a stupid, & dangerous argument, for if Daddy Gov. says it's okay does that mean morally it's sound??? No. Incorrect.
If severe Martial Law in the U.S started tomorrow & reproductive rights for everyone were stripped to reduce population and everyone in the U.S had curfew effective immediately--Or marrying 5-10 year olds was legally allowed or giving up your infants to the State if they say so-- would any of that being "CULTURE" & Legal make it okay? No.
Apologetics trying to justify exploitation of kids in cartoons because "it's allowed", are social risk factors. VERY dangerous attitude to have.
And it's even more embarrassing when these mooks don't even subscribe to what actually is "Japanese culture", like their theatre, their language, history, festivals, etc.
but will defend the sexual exploitation of girls/characters in general (cause it's not just girls but mainly girls) because age of consent or (muh boners) and call that Japanese "culture".
Ppl wildin, hard.
2023 [UPDATE]: Japan raised the age of consent to 16 because sex crimes against women and children have gotten out of control in the past 30 years, geeee i wonder why a Country with a booming industry with a sub-culture that glorifies dehumanizing and over-sexualizing women and children would for no reason at all have a rising issue with sex crimes against women & children?
Did some research to confirm what I suspect, but I know what I know. Youtube has some kind of killswitch function to basically take a video off of life support and then it flatlines.
Example:
Video does 300views first 24–36 hours to a week (because not everyone is entitled to go viral, everyone knows this), and so instead of rising on the graph then naturally sloping down & rising like a normal graph, like any normal pattern of graph.
In 2024s CorporationTube, the video that was doing consistently well suddenly just flatlines after 12 days.
Prior to the 10th day mark, the graph rises and rises.
So the question becomes: Why isn’t something that’s doing good continue to rise and do good?
What changed? I/We/You certainly didn’t do anything and we just sat back and wondered why a low effort video is getting more attention than our better videos. Sooo it wasn’t us.
See YouTube agents, shills, some people love love Loooove to gaslight small creators into believing that they (creators) are the sole issue.
Your content is “just not good”, and yet so many people can attest that their LOW EFFORRT uploads that they themselves know are not good, for some reason gets more views than the content they put effort into.
Its not consistent. Not that logic nor the system they’re defending.
(So basically, between not pushing your content to your own subscribers, they’re not recommending it to anyone. You don’t exist. And then they have the nerve to give you tips, like you’re the problem when the solution is to just let people’s content run it’s course and god forbid: Let people decide decide what they want to watch instead of some soul-less algorithm deciding what you watch.)
I repeat: People are not ignoring your content, YouTube is ignoring you, they’re not endorsing you, they’re neglecting your contribution, thus no one knows what you exist. Not because no one wants to watch your shit, NOBODY knows it’s there to be watched.
Your channel is doing “ok” aka barely making bread, but its not dead so “everything okay, question nothing”.
See, When a good video flatlines like someone decided in a booth that your video did good “enough” for the month, and decided it was time for it to go to sleep for 10 years.
Or 5 uploads in a row do less than usual like your content is being hidden from traffic altogether.
(Because how the hell is a video supposed to get traction to grow if it’s not allowed to circulate in the first place?) 🧠
Like dead on arrival. Custom thumbnails, specified time so subscribers know its up, certain boxes checked & unchecked for maximum algorithm efficiency (All the functions SponsorTube added to make posting videos more and more of a burden than FUN🌈 ie. the original purpose of the site)
You do everything on your end to ensure results, all while missing the fact that you don’t run the site, you can’t MAKE your videos do good because there’s but so much you can do. We are not Youtube.
But by gaslighting creators into wracking their brains, and being frustrated by the same lack of results, it’s a hamster wheel, it’s blatant manipulation.
And a brutal means of demoralizing people. It’s actually pretty genius. Keep people grinding to do better & better when they have no control, while you know 100% the solution was never in the hands of the users but your own because you run the site.
Absolute genius level manipulation.
Point being: With ALL the people on YouTube, clicking and clicking and clicking per second- a channel gets only 50views of traffic on a fairly well produced video after a year?
Huh?
That is very VERY unnatural. You’ll have people with 50k-1M subs struggling to get even half the equivalent views. Some with sponsors.
So imagine the likelihood that a small channel of 5k and under is being suppressed by a platform that blatantly shows its dishonesty, distance, and double standards.
When a good video doing good suddenly flatlines like it was smothered in the crib, thats not the “algorithm”, that was analytical assassination.
YouTube made a HUGE mistake giving us the ability to see our videos numbers, now their fraudulent system can be see in action in realtime.
If your video is shit, then its shit. The actual issue is YouTube are frauds BECAUSE the system is inconsistent and fraudulent.
INCONSISTENT.
YOU do not Broadcast Yourself anymore, WE broadcast our sponsors. No sponsors? Tough nuts. You don’t matter. And if we want? What you create won’t exist either.
The “it’s a business” bullshit doesn’t hold up, because if the video isn’t supporting hate, terrorism, all the isms but its just an edit or a cool fight, or some original music and its being shadow banned-
Consistent suppression of potential & creativity, is not good business, it’s a blatant failsafe to prevent anyone self-made from ever, and I mean EVER competing with paid Youtubers and specifically Big Companies, the favored spoiled children of the platform that they’ll never strike, or shadowban, block or takedown (until a certain point, for the paid youtubers, because even they’re not safe). Corporations owned by elites, YouTube will NEVER treat them with half the shit they spare for us.
Its about maintaining hierarchy.
It’s fascism, and it’s remarkably stupid. Its a mechanism to keep med-small channels in their place and keep the sponsored groups on top. Cause even big Youtubers, while they get privileges, even they’re not safe for long if Youtubes good graces go sour.
That’s all this is. And its very obvious when you don’t allow people to gaslight you when there’s but so much you can do when the people controlling the system do not care about creators to begin with (everyone knows this), or deflect the actual problem as a non-issue because apathy takes less braincells.
Cause if channels were allowed to develop and grow naturally? A lot of us wouldn’t be at 1Mil let alone 500k, lets be honest, you’re worth what you produce.
But you’d definitely would be big enough to where people would know you exist, Why? Because that’s called GROWTH.. That’s a fact.
The entire point of this new system is prevent you from Broadcasting Yourself. That’s the point.
Because there’s no lucrative point for any business to suppress content that follows the goddamn rules anyway.
Because ads run on every video now, so why repress anyone if it wasn’t about maintaining a status-quo?
Unless it’s to gatekeep or regulate who gets to succeed on your watch.
I repeat: Unless it’s to gatekeep or regulate who is ALLOWED to succeed on your watch.
It’s control.
(And the less people that watch the smaller channels, that's less ads being ran, meaning less money per ad that's not being played because youtube wants to smother videos, soooo technically they're actually losing money by being scumbags lmfao)
YouTube Analytics, all those functions, them giving you “tips”, agents dispelling “myths” about the almighty algorithm, they are trying to keep you ignorant by giving you the biggest means of misdirection known to man: HOPE
If people can tell you to fix the problem, then you have hope, if you have hope, then you won’t ask questions anymore because then you feel in control then you feel a sense of security.
When the one’s with the keys to a good portion of your success, are the one’s running the goddamn site.
Its all control through giving you an illusion of control through all these shiny buttons and seemingly sophisticated UI.
Like looking at numbers & a thumbnail is making a damn difference, they know exactly what they’re doing.
Make you & your content the problem, you’re not good enough, just do (this) or just do (that) when in reality we have the solution with the flip of a switch. Because we run the goddam site. But gaslight you to keep you in check and prevent you from asking questions.
Control. Control. Control.
YouTube became an experiment for Dystopian level fascism, it has all the hallmarks for a little “S” word with an “ism” on the end. But I’ll let you put two and two together.
Point being, The keyword is the flatlining, erratic graphs are: Unnatural, inorganic, orchestrated, inconsistent. Unnatural.
And if the best explanation you have is constantly making creators the problem? The issue is being deflected.
This isn’t me saying everyone deserves 1mil subs, this is me saying people should succeed by their own merit & effort, not what merit you’re told you’re worth ie. stunting people’s growth with a variable ceiling.
