imagine they made a post recommending a show to people, & then you come along- not to disagree with arguments while acknowledging what little the show also does right:
but instead telling them not to explain why their favorite show works, solely because you/we/ i decided for everyone that we don't see the "need" to have a conversation about it, regardless of good or bad.
Just slap a 10 on Mal and move on.
A flaw as it is, I get caught up in my own guff sometimes when I go on tangents but the ego on that one? In that statement? Can't compete, I'm beat. Holy moly.
All the essays I could cook up to make a damn book can't match the power levels of pretentious in that very short comment.
"I don't see the appeal of discussing-" [translation]: you stop talking about it because I'm over it. Yeah? O rly? Lmfao.
now would they say that if the opinion was exactly what they wanted to hear? Course not.
being a teacher is one of the most important roles in any infrastructure. It's why being a parent is so important.
The issue isn't that, the issue is he wouldn't have achieved anything if it weren't for him just by miracle meeting Yagi who just happened to be the #1 hero who just happened to have a transferable quirk that just happened to be a compilation type that just happened to be connected to the main villain who just happened to be connected to Tomura.
Deku achieved nothing before he met All Might, thus he needed a plot contrivance to get anything done on his own. That's the issue. He was given everything, and achieved nothing.
Him training with the power is him making the most out of a handicap, a hand-out, a mod that no one else had.
Melissa had no powers, she made it work & used her mind to contribute, so did her Father. Melissa should've been the mc.
He didn't achieve his dream because he seized it, he didn't achieve it because it was not of his own ability.
If he was already in U.A and was failing, then met All Might who noticed he was quirkless, that's different but AT LEAST he managed to get in the damn school on his own.
No he couldn't even do the entrance exams on his own. He had his hand held the entire way. Even when he went rogue, the adults were keeping tabs on him via tracking chip in his phone. Always shadowing him, the kid couldn't DO ANYTHING on his own. Not even shower or feed himself properly.
He was pathetic.
He needed God to hand him the keys to success in the beginning and apparently the end as well seeing how Yagi (the one who's always handing him free shit) gives him basically a super exo-skeleton. Which is probably what should've went down in the first place back in 2014
The teacher bit is least of the problems, way to miss the point which is Horikoshi missed/& defeated his own point.
Deku doesn't vigilante by night and a teacher by day, but yet again handed more power. Deku is a spoiled man-child.
He has zero drive, he was too passive. Too damn NPC to be the main character. He doesn't do shit unless he's activated by a quest prompt.
He's right, gotta unwind. Negativity siphons you if you just dwell on it 24/7. Criticizing something to make a point, for awareness or principle, fine; vs tearing something down & wanting it to fail out of spite, nah.
Too much effort.
#videogames#negativity
re: “It’s always lovely to see internet whiners get what’s coming to them!”
"get what’s coming to them!", ain't no way you said that just cause a n1gga didn't like a redesign.
“What an amazing response to a really needless comment.”
“Needless”, because it wasn’t a response that praised the product or made you feel good about yourself.
Very disproportionate reactions to a simple “I don’t like the new design.”
I saw a HTTYD trailer comment recently claiming they think being a true fan is supporting the creator blindly like a cult member. Or just supporting to support is being a true fan, regardless of context, ie. a cult member.
I see a lot with Manga/Anime followings.
"Have faith"
"Trust in the OP"
"It gets better"
"Trust their vision"
All the shit you'd hear in a cult fanatic circle. Common theme: Think less, consume the message and question nothing.
Instead of a god, you got the product.
Otherwise, Harada didn’t “blast” shit, they replied professionally simply stating that the detractor should speak for themselves, and they’re right.
Because thinking the devs slighted the fans in some way just because YOU didn't like the outfit is pretentious.
Tho despite 98% of fans liking the look, the 2% was enough to get a lengthy reaction from the game's own Director specifically.
So apparently 2% mattered a lot to the dude, mind you, this is all over a DLC character.
I repeat: this all because some nobody didn’t like the re-design of a DLC character.
What an asshole right? I guess for the sake of everyone’s mental health they should’ve just pretended to like it?
That was worth celebrating an internet whiner getting “ what’s coming to them!” — Excuse you? I’m still trying to recall what the actual crime was here.
Sure them stating the design was the devs being vindictive was a dumb take, but is that really worth ...all that?
This shit right here is why it’s not worth it to be a fan of anything, if the corporations themselves aren’t cannibalizing the IP, then the fans themselves turn on each other at the slightest infraction of wrong-think, it’s pathetic.
We gotta stop forcing fandoms to be hiveminds, clutching pearls every time someone defies the will of the collective.
Not very inclusive or tolerant or healthy, very radical in fact; Very abusive environment.
Since someone has to say it:
No you don’t have to support everything served to you to feel like you belong to the community or to be considered a fan. Being a blind yes-man is not being a fan, that’s a sycophant, NPC shit. It’s unnecessary.
TL;DR If you like it, then let that be enough.
A Wasp-like colony defense mechanism to any form of dissent displays nothing but a lack of confidence in what we/ or you claim to like in the first place.
Otherwise the outfit has fabulous boots✅ but without a slim skirt, gown, or dress (ok, fine but it’s definitely a minus)❌
Loud af pants, despite how little of them you actually see.
Ugly top & leg straps with buckles, lol ok then.
Santa Claus red fabric & white fur jacket (cute) but with GOLD AND BLACK? Not cute🤮, I didn’t even realize how bad it was until I got a high-res photo and looked at it.
Definitely looks better from a distance.
Her Chinese dress look was underwhelming but classic, simple, this is just doing way too much in the other direction. Like a shitty oc.
If they had to have the boots, give ‘er a mini-dress or something sleek & slim that compliments them and the jacket. Especially that jacket.
Should’ve combined this fur jacket with a Jessica Rabbit motif, some kind of dress; Something more classy/diva.
Its so odd they didn’t go with a leather jacket with this specific outfit choice & instead went with white fur? WITHOUT a gown btw. Or any other significant white in the rest of the outfit to compliment it, vs clashing with it.
Very in-the box decision making.😂👍oh well.
As long as the game plays as it should & the story is decent, it’s the same character regardless.
All I know is, people really need to stop working against themselves, especially when it’s with good intentions. Why push away other fans just because they committed the sin of not reinforcing your feelings over a given topic. Fuck them, amiright?
"Diversity" for you, "inclusion" for you- Until you go against the grain, and now you can get lost & shut up, good riddance. And over what?
Show that criticizer who's boss by .....criticizing them. #Consistency
All the Director said TL;DR was "speak for yourself", and that's fine because the commenters narrative of the devs getting back at the fans or some crap was reaching, yet in short all they communicated was they didn't like it, that's it.
Everything surrounding that simple fact was entirely unnecessary, including the Director replying to it at all. Cause again it seems that person would've done themselves a favor by just pretending to like it so everyone's happy and they're not ostracized.
What kind of space is that if you have to keep your head down & capitulate 24/7 or else you're Public Enemy #1, horrible, toxic environment and for no reason.
No room for dialog but Everyone's got something to say but no one wants to talk. And over what? An outfit choice for a video game character.👏
It's entitlement that that fan thought the devs was sticking it to the fans somehow just because they in isolation didn't like the design choice and it's entitlement to think someone owes you vindication just because you liked it.
Or they got just desserts because they were made an example of for not liking it, like what the fuck.
This propensity for aggressive self-regulating group-think is becoming more and more concerning by the week. It's not a new phenomenon but usually people catch themselves but I'm starting to notice a lack of that lately.
It’s not worth it, you then corrupt the purpose of a fandom in the first place. It is not worth it.
Plus i think the sword she had was magic or something,, if the monster wasn't a Lovecraftian Elder or something with PSI or TK. Her beating it ain't even an issue. Her S1 debut was ok enough, she did cool shit the 1610 Rogers did.
I wish they feminized her super soldier build a little more like the 90s Spiderman Cartoon Black Cat. Peggy's petite face on that butch body was uncanny valley in the worst way, distracting at the least
Her head's too small, shoulders too wide, torso way too big & long, small chest, lanky legs. Just horrible. They tried to make her like Steve instead of making her the ideal physiological specimen of a woman super soldier, visually as well as practical.
Unless I heard wrong, op criticizes that the show implies being remotely kinky being a bad thing is a bad thing.
Then calls Orb Weavers kinks "weird", "fucking freak", whoah buddy. 33:14
Be consistent dude.
All in all, it's okay to say Kinks is just childhood baggage, and people use sex as a coping mechanism for it, whatever it is the kink represents.
Yes, it's weird, no majority of it is not okay. It's silly.
It's not the best sign a childhood was well adjusted and a lot of it is people overcompensating for something in the past. ESPECIALLY the SM ones or the dom ones.
The definition of it is "unusual sexual behavior", so yes if the overtone is Kink-isms is weird because villains do it, thus it's weird-
it's correct because that's the definition of the word. And even if it wasn't, just look what people are doing just to get to the actual point of stimulation: The ACTUAL love making.
In no language, in any context is Kink synonymous with "Adjusted", "Aspirational" or "Good job parents". The villains being the kinky ones fits in exactly what the word entails.
You like your feet tickled while restrained? You have issues. Plain and simple
It's no one's job to give you a cookie and say "Good job" for being a maladjusted whacko who somehow complicated a simple formula of reproduction.
Who prolly got their feet stimulated by a friend or something as a child, maybe you were pinned down playfully & got tickled, you felt powerless (technically violated) and you just never let that shit go, now you call it this obsession a "kink", when it's just a coping mechanism .
I promise you that's how easy it is to get a kink, children's minds are fragile man, none of this shit is normal, okay or natural.
And notice how most of it doesn't come from a healthy place like your parents hugging you or something nice.
It's usually something negative or off putting that births a lot of kinks, a lot of it is literally just repressed experiences you need to get out your system properly but all we want to hear is what we want to hear.
Because path of least resistance is the NPC's default brain mode.
There's a big difference between being rough, liking lingerie, a little oil body massage to rev her engines, oral VS wanting to be wrapped in plastic, balls stepped on, candle wax, whipped, kicked, spat on or some other stupid shit that clearly screams "Grow the hell up"
This is one of few times the show was actually gangsta in it's subtext and probably unintentionally.
est.AUG 2024 Productive criticism is necessary to any civilization, it helps prevent gradual social devolution, which is exactly what this is.
I often have to remind myself that the majority of people posting this Giantess garbage are actually-- NOT children being silly, these are grownass adults. I have to actively remind myself of that.
People are waaaaaaaay too comfortable making their issues & internal complications everyone's business because some 'think' no one will say anything. And frankly the entire point of sharing it is to be told you did a good job, you're not harming anyone and nothing's wrong with you as you masturbate to genocide.
Which explains the desperate defense mechanisms & deflection whenever someone does say something, pure fragility born of a culture of weakness that spawned from a culture in decline.
Way too spoiled by those echo chambers bud.
Macrophilia is-
a telltale symptom of civilizational failure, because the entire fetish boldly representsrawhuman incompetence in the form of an ironically/likely an unintentional silly parody of toxic gynocentrism destroying people's lives. Which it does IRL.
How do I know? Because propaganda emulates where it comes from, which is why the "fiction is fiction" cope doesn't work.
In this case, the fetish emulates the toxic culture that created it. Just look at America 2000-2024+.
look at how much they respect the men
Are the men honored, or made to look incompetent, inferior, defective & dehumanized?
Look at their birthrates
Is the traditional family reinforced, supported or trivialized?
Look at how the women are put on pedestals, infantilized, and mistreated in the same breath.
Are American men and women in a good place or are they disconnected, hence Macrophilia emulating that disconnect through size gaps, Stockholm syndrome, narcissism, self-loathing, insecurity, & inferiority complex. Him on the bottom, her on a pedestal, above.
None of this just happened spontaneously, like any virus or sickness, It was cultivated from corruption.
Bad thing created bad thing.
Macrophilia is a blatant manifestation of collective cultural, parental, societal incompetence. Hence why the fetish at it's core is a misanthropic disgrace.
As insecurity tends to do:
One makes their macro-linked socio-struggle (whatever it is, because it's not the same for everyone) thus everyone's business: aka A cry for help.
Which is why macrocreeps often feel compelled to spread their propaganda everywhere like a virus, because as insecurity tends to do also: Misery needs company. It needs it.
📌Fact of the matter is, this kind of obsession is too era specific to ignore, even with indifference. (Patience has a limit)
It's unique by how it emulates the toxicity from the overarching culture, not the era from 1973 but the specific era of misandry & gynocentric woman worship culture that birthed it in the first place post 1990, it wasn't that bad in early 2000, I won't lie and say it was. But the misandry was there but it was tame, subliminal.
Thus unnatural, cultivated. Created.
And how Macrophilia represents that society's failure (one of many), failure to empower women & girls without misleading them (badly misled), whilst abandoning boys & men in the process and neglecting them. (badly neglected, castrated and broken)
The visual size gap, the disconnect, her being above. Is symbolic of disconnect. Separation, the agenda.
Is merely a coincidental symbolic parallel thus evidence? No.
But what it's being compared to (real time statistics vindicating decline & social divide vs the decline & social divide that the fetishist needs in order to get off. Even if it's gentle, the disconnect is necessary because that's their reality. It didn't come from out of nowhere. )
Representing the literal pedestal women are propped up on for no logical reason, no earned reason.
The IRL Disconnect that modern society is imposing on men and women; Hence the tense gender relations. The agenda, if you wanted to destroy an empire on purpose? Do what American has been doing for the past 50 years..trivialize the men (the tinies) and inflate the importance of women, tell them they don't need men, even when the castle they stand in, men built. (giantess, the illusion of security)
That's how you demoralize a nation, now people made a fetish out of demoralizing themselves. That's how you destroy an empire. Destroy peoples ability to discern what to submit to and then they'll impose that horror on themselves.
Now that: is power
When left alone, in nature, men and women were/are designed to be together; even intellectually. It's not like they'd never fight without modern culture, sure disagreements happen, that's human, but this level of animosity? Confusion? Genocide being painted as a game?
That's the kind of problems you get in fantasy when you force problems in reality.
Art mirrors reality, even if the artists have zero idea what the hell it is they're even doing most of the time, severe waste of talent btw. Severe utter waste.-- they're definitely communicating something. That's not something to just ignore when it's so consistent, they're obsessed with letting the world know.
It's why this film is so....ironic. I recommend it.
If you raised boys in a culture that respects men, you don't get this obsession on mass.
Actively stopped mocking males, hold corrupt men accountable & revere productive manhood so boys & young bucks actually want to actively plug into society instead of running from it 24/7
📌Trying to replace reality and replace women with fantasy, lies, constructs, shackles, wonderland; things they can appropriate & control like waifus, goddesses, a proxy for possible mommy or daddy issues (because the biggest people a child imprints on first are the parents)
Anything and everything to retreat from what's real here in the real. Only to unplug & live their lives and technically be "functionally" deranged & imbalanced, but not healthy.
Anything and everything to avoid a solution. Shinji Ikari Syndrome, running away. Peter Pan Syndrome, stuck as a boy, refusal to grow up.
If you raised boys & girls (Because Women, Girls & Womanhood is under attack as well by this cultural abolition) in a biome where they're not culturally abused, exploited & made to feel inferior, they won't then normalize or conflate being small/ and abuse with arousal, the human brain is not complicated. At all. Neither are women.
You don't get to abuse women, the only natural threshold of human life and your culture will be successful. It will never happen.
Deify women, you will still fail, because a woman is mortal, she is not a god, she does not create life, she delivers it.
📌Men are not here to serve women, women are not here to serve men. They serve each other. It's very simple.
You can't slander, degrade, or abandon men or women. Or prop up one, neglect the other and expect success when the working formula is you need both, unity. YOU NEED BOTH.
A Giantess didn't build America or Japan, Men did. So imagine the irony of a symbol of a mountain sized femcel being a burden to everyone, that's your definition of power and yet the people that build the roads you drive on are men. At some point, every adult must leave childish things behind, or remain a child forever & life a quarter of a life, because the other 75% is in a delusion that you will never possess and truly? You don't want to be real.
Prosperity in society will never happen with her looking down on him, emasculating him while being gentle. it will never happen with him oppressing her, demeaning her. Dysfunction will never be rewarded with prosperity. Never.
It's how you got macrophiles in the first place, that's the reward. The reward is people are essentially communicating (whether they realize it or not) that:
📌A Woman with any advantage is a threat to Men, Women and Civilization. And that's a damn lie, pure 100% misogyny (And I hate using that word, it's overused).
But many people assault the internet with that same propaganda over and over again, things I'd rather ignore, but I repeat, patience has a limit family.
Like they have something very specific to prove; something or someone to prove it to. (Misery needs company)
And the sad part? I guaran-fucking tee- you, they don't even realize that's what they're projecting. And that's the point of propaganda. That's how dangerous it is.
But still people play with this for years on end because they have nothing better to do, alrighty then:
Misconceptions repeated, repeated misconceptions eroticized, is how you lose people to hedonism, then eventually devolution. Social-decline in intelligence.
Which is one of the few ways/ ONLY ways you can explain how people can unironically enjoy macabre of human genocide (their own species by the way) by a woman, the threshold of life. It's a fucking insult, a mockery. Pure disrespect.
Now flipping off the middle finger is an insult, it doesn't harm anyone but you still shouldn't do it.
In this case, I can't imagine anything more misogynist or insulting than painting a woman with power a burden to society or something a man must rely on without reciprocation or equal protection. Because if he's the size of a crumb, what is she getting back? Nothing.
So that's not harming anyone, it's an insult, blatantly disrespectful; but that should be left alone? On what planet does that make any sense?
Devolution in motion baby, that meme of "dying brain cells" isn't that far off from reality in this context, even if it's hyperbole, you have to kill your own brain cells over the course of years (thus becoming a fetishist at all) in order to be able to eat that shit up. This is why criticism is necessary, accountability needs a comeback.
Women trampling civilization is a damaged child's notion of control or power, it's an illusion
Really think about how infantile that is in context of a GTS (Gynocentric Trivial Silliness):
She's in control only because she's the only one with the advantage, without a rival. But when she gets nuked, she dead boi: Then Humanity had the power still. Story over.
So it's a contradiction.
📌And if she's like 6'000ft tall (A nuke can still kill her #1), #2 if not, she's going to suffer brain damage from oxygen deprivation, so even Earth herself is going to kill her. If she doesn't need to breathe, she'll starve, she'll dehydrate, go insane from no social contact, no medical assistance for monthlies.... It's beyond silly.
Women need civilization that men provide, so showing women destroying their inheritance is the ultimate spit in the face to women themselves. Especially as a fantasy, it's actually worse when you think this shit is funny & don't truly understand what it is you're peddling into the world.
See she can break stuff, but the little people have literally EVERYTHING she doesn't have, from food to other people. They have tampons for fuck's sake, so who really has the power & who's trapped? Lol.
Infrastructure is power, the ability to take care of yourself.
That kind of nuance makes the entire fetish look like exactly what it's always been: Babytalk. "Tiny, teeny weeny, small, itty bitty", actual dialogue from the context. And no, these are NOT children pumping this stuff out. I promise you these aren't 11yr olds in a phase. A community and everything, I kid you not.
Moderate suspended development, hence the obsession with being small or tiny; because for most, the seed gets planted when one as a child; Small and vulnerable. Suspended development. The reverse? Being the giant, overcompensation, wanting to be surrounded by vulnerability, illusion of self-importance.
Or what if, theoretically, something smaller than the giant entered the chat and was still superior (Ghost Rider, Dr.Manhattan, Superman, Wonder Woman, Helspont, Dark Phoenix, Silver Surfer, Shazam, Hulk, Thanos, an average Super Robot or something possibly Interdimensional/ ethereal...)
Point being: Illusion of power. You're in control, until you're not. You're a goddess (not rly lol) until you're not. You have "the power", until you don't. Which simply means you had no power to begin with, Illusion. A child throwing a tantrum.
No matter how you slice it, it's silly, it's goofy. It's corny. An illusion.
Fact is, needing to impose one's will is not power nor strength nor control nor leadership, it's incompetence. Overcompensating. So when thats the fantasy for decades on end? There's a case to made.
You can't control anything or anyone if you are not in control of self.
And if you were in control, thus wouldn't feel the need to control anything or anyone, you'd be secure. But whilst out of control you think you're in control. That's the paradox of the power fantasy. Insecurity is the throughline.
It takes power to create a system. It takes weakness, it takes even less than nothing to destroy what you had no hand in creating, that's the fallacy of abolishing family, abolishing norms that built the pot you piss in.
The point is to give up control because you have none even over yourself, zero agency over your own will. Submission and surrender is not the same thing.
Depressing, I know. Society did a number on A LOT of people, one serious fucking number.
Which is not a conscious choice initially in a kid's mind, kids don't pick up signals, they internalize them, thus it's a seed planted. A child doesn't watch Totally Spies, and just choose that Giant Mandy episode and go 'I'm going to be an obsessed tool for the rest of my life'. This is something subconscious.
But in an adult or hormone driven teenager, after the seed gets triggered? Naturally, people choose to be stupid after they desensitize themselves. Some even make a career or living off this stuff.
But the entire point of the initial "Just Do It if it feels good" propaganda is to encourage people to do exactly that, indulge, plug out of reality, into the Matrix, down the rabbit role:
📌NPC's with no discipline or agency is easier to control. Which is why the hook here, is surrendering agency to basically a Governmental dominance. Easy to lie to.
Men & women separated are easier to control than Men and Women united. That's why the size gap is so ironic.
Consume, compliant, obey, apathy, question nothing, surrender. Like a viewer from Little Nightmares, sterilized and distracted:
📌And I do NOT blame these guys/gals entirely, macrocreeps. Goofballs they are, as fucking annoying as they are, are just a product, people with an affliction, people, a casualty.
The actual problem is what caused that obsession in the first place, no baby is coming out the womb thinking "Crush them all", "kill me", "How can I ruin this character for no goddamn reason?", "You know what? Next time have her eat her kids alive. That's a neat trick"-- Because #ParenthoodFail
Even outside of Macrocreeps, no child comes out the womb acting like Shadman or your average Sexual Predator that actually physically hurts people.
That shit doesn't happen, children aren't born stupid, they are in fact smarter than adults due to lack of socio-advanced ego. They are untainted.
The corrupting Is introduced, installed: The culture they live in, (in this context) in some subliminal way or blatantly- signaled that men are subhuman, less or just stupid and women are to be put on high.
All lies. All propaganda to twist, corrupt, bend, and pervert a person/ a child's natural instincts. that's what macrophilia is, a perversion of instinct.
Seeing a giant woman in an animated movie won't do that to you, but socio-political narratives you ingest later in life will give that giant a schtick, a script, and that's the "power", "control", "Gynarchy" script these people regurgitate for akin to a lifetime in this part-time or even full-time non-clinical/unconventional insanity.
The (Philia) is not the cause of these issues, but It's a reflection of why Americans/UK/ The west is failing, birthrates, shotty gender relations, marriages, marriage retention, all failure, lack of accountability, etc..
📌Macrophilia did not create this failure, it merely is another symptom among the many, a reflection of failure. Because macrophilia is certainly not something reflecting anything edifying or something to endorse in civilized society.
The Japanese are feeling it too, both the decline of the "Man" & birthrates dips, which is why so many overcompensate their personal incompetence with fetishism in order to feel belonging or purpose. I get why people do this, they want to exist--
and the taboo of it makes it exciting, & it's even more exciting with how epic it is because of the scale.
I get it. But we're not 10 year old children anymore.
📌Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.
For Japan, around 2012, their Gov. stated (paraphrasing): 'Owning CP Doujinshi's is not a problem because it being on their computer hurts no one'
"It's not hurting anyone.", You'll hear that a lot when people don't have an argument for their case.
But in 2023, the Japanese bureaucracy changed their tune, why? Because enough people got hurt via SA & violated (children & women specifically) to where after 100 years they changed the Age of consent to 16 from 13. But only after people got harmed. The suits thought fetishism was a harmless pass time, until it wasn't.
So what have we learned, the same thing that's always been true:
"It's not hurting anyone" is not an argument.
📌Excuses are not arguments. They're excuses. Fiction is not just fiction, it's a reflection, an heir to reality. Because reality forms fiction as the parody of itself.
📌Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.
Sure men are literal forces of nature that build all the goddamn cities, die doing it and still get it done, keep the power grid on, clean the sewers, build the roads, the bridges, the flooring, the roofing, all the things we take for granted.
But nah man, they're insects beneath the feet of women. "Yes Goddess, whatever you say Goddess. *dur":
The irony isn’t lost on me that some of us use the phone/tablet/computer/machines men invented/contributed to build/pioneer to indulge in a fetish that lauds that men are less than human, slaves, weak, insignificant- basically trivializing life (women’s/sometimes children's lives included) as a whole as a turn-on.
I could rightfully say: Fuck you too.
But you see, resentment is also part of the trap, because it solves nothing. Fighting is distraction. Resentment of the people pushing this garbage, (while should be held accountable) when they themselves are victims of ulterior or direct abuse & propagandizing.
That’s misplacement of anger, the system is the source.
Explanation, analysis, elaboration, calling out the lore, the truth, filling in the gaps the professionals are overlooking (long-winded be damned) that is more productive than an attack and nothing else. And no, I don’t care how many times I need to say it.
If no one else is saying it, it will be done.
(Because contrary to popular belief, women don't want slaves, they want someone to give a shit, respect & love them, and give back. CONTRARY TO popular myth, Women are NOT complex. Just misunderstood, A LOT)
Otherwise epic metaphorical or literal visual castration over and over again in fantasy La-La Land is definitely something we want to pass on to the baby boys that come after us, right? Right. Genius.
99% aren’t even thinking about that, stuck in Peter pan syndrome mode, instant gratification mode, product of the times. This is why people need to think.
We need less boys, and more men. Because no surprise, while women are macro-afflicted too, the majority of macrocreeps are men.
Seriously dangerous shit people are playing with, and imprinting on it so many times jacking off to it. entertaining it for years, internalizing it deeper and deeper.
All according to plan. Who's plan? Fuck If I know, all I know is, if i wanted to bring down an empire; macrophilia is how i'd know from a distance that what I'm doing is working.
📌Starting with Him. The Male, the founder. And the most effective way to break the man, is through one of two things he'd die to protect: Her, the Female.
It's a sick joke, but that's warfare.
Even if this phenomenon is unintentional on part of the media, that's the result you're going to get from failure, destabilization, decline.
Which is why, not to my surprise, the popular scenario these cats are obsessed with beside a man being broken by a woman- emotionally or physically. Or usually both. The foundation being emasculated, destruction of the family unit through the woman or absence of the man or the surrender of the male's manhood.
With the "you're tiny " this, "small" that or commenting on how small his manhood is, just childish. All kinds of babytalk, Schoolyard bully shit that would annoy anyone with their balls still attached, women included.
The symptom mirrors the actual problem, the fetish mirrors and emulates the dysfunction of the overarching culture. You can't make this shit up.
They're the one's posting this stuff a million times like religious zealots, like their lives depended on showing men or women getting castrated, domineered or slaughtered for the thousandth time, but what they're actually illustrating & how it relates to the world they live in: See that all goes right over their heads.
Blissful and ignorant. By design.
Psychologists avoid getting into the actual problem (despite Macrophilia being an open book) because it's either not in their jurisdiction to admit people have a problem, which actually is their goddamn job, but the truth makes people feel some type of way.
"Pathologizing" is the term I've come to know, which means stating something negative as negative just might make people feel bad about it.
Accountability makes people feel uneasy (good, that's part of the healing process)
So sticking to "maybe" & "perhaps" & "possibly" 24/7 is safer for optics.
Status quo successfully maintained, cancellation avoided but nothing is solved.
Or theorizing this lie that giant women is "possibly" men possibly wanting more female empowerment..........in a society that at one point trended #KillAllMen on a social platform (twitter i think), soooooo yeah, it's not a mystery where this hateful, bitter fetish came from when men are openly disrespected in the same sentence as the word "kill" here in reality.
BUT WOMEN NEED More empowerment?
They didn't specify women that live in third world societies that are actually treated on a similar level as pets; But instead pampered first world society women are the one's that need even more pandering?
Not that men need to be cut a break (because they do all the dangerous jobs women don't even know exist) but women need even more elevation.
Huh, that's interesting deflection.
Or at one point, you could type "men are" on tumblr hashtags, and one of the recommends is #MenAreTrash, but no, this is about women not getting propped up on enough pedestals.
Really Doc? That's some rusty theory there.
Okay granted, they were smart to offer it as a possibility, so let's play this game real quick before I wrap this up:
So the gaslight of the decade is:
men are projecting women committing genocide on entire cities *which last I checked housed babies & children* (sometimes even playfully, because #Parenthoodfail, good job mom and dad):
Not because men are abused in the culture & dehumanized to the point where they own the abuse & glorify it as a very psychologically self-destructive, self-deprecating bad coping mechanism (which would involve psychologists having to finally admit society failed men *& by proxy women*, then humanize men as the victims of misandry)
But no instead let's make it about women not having enough empowerment (Which makes women the victims as usual, deflects the actual problem and men are YET AGAIN an afterthought, bottommost priority. As usual, AS USUAL.)
Too much fence sitting & enabling from the "authorities". Too Irresponsible.
How is it irresponsible? Easy. Being vague helps absolutely no one when people look to you for answers. Period.
People in certain positions of credential authority are so fickle these days, always worried about feelings and thus their own livelihood & how it looks. Thus neglecting the truth, the context, the lore, how powerful an influence culture is on how people think, on what children shelve into their subconscious.
Thus neglecting the truth is neglect of the people.
You can be considerate to someone's humanity and still say: "No, not okay",
or "It's not your fault that you have it, it really says more about how abusive your environment is than it is about you, but you don't have to/shouldn't settle for it for the rest of your natural life just because you think this gives you purpose, or you think being controlled gives you security or a reminiscent feeling of maternal or even patriarchal comfort of authority: when really it's just masking deep rooted ineptitude, pain, insecurity, trauma, unresolved socio-emotional struggles. Women are not your overlords. You have options, it's on you to break free. Don't settle for less. Don't play a game designed to make you the loser." --- Or something like that / The professional can do that, anyone can do both.
Or? The likely situation is a lot of these people with all their academic background, they see the surface level symptoms, they know all the glossary terminology per their training and make their best guess to remain neutral.
But they don't realize how it actually correlates with society. So them being "vague" is literally them not knowing what this thing actually is.
Because it's very unlikely they're hiding the truth because "Mwahaha, share my article you plebs!", I doubt it, so this really is a situation where the propaganda is so integrated even the professionals don't even see it hiding in plain sight.
Which is the entire point. The most blatant example of propaganda is a movie trailer, a poster, a movie website. Plant seeds of suggestion to make you buy product. Control.
Macrophilia is too intimate and spiteful to have been entirely on purpose, again, the fetish isn't causing a first world society's gender relation problems, it's yet another symptom of failure resulting of that disconnect.
Because you don't get a phenomenon like this in an era where men and women are in a good place. You only get something like this when something is wrong.
Even in a gentle setting,
that very awkward overtone of superiority just has to linger or be inserted or forced in some way, usually through the man, he, she or the narrator has to point out in some contrived way how superior she is, how big she is, how effortlessly powerful she is, how much control she has over him with the slightest movement. It's so nauseating, infantile and pitiful but grownass adults are writing that garbage, not a 5 year old, someone's child is writing this crap.
"Teenytiny" and what not, just holy moly. It's really something to see how people act when they assume everyone in the room is in on it.
Point being: She has to remain on the pedestal, or be domineering out of context- even when she's being nice. You can't make this shit up.
Second hand embarrassment to the max.
It's so funny how persistent that narrative is, that "Future is female", "#HeForShe" Male servitude conditioning is strong boy, goddamn.
It's why their "content"- even ironically always sucks, it screams insecurity, even when written by women. It never ages well, sure it gets the job done for the "initiated" but it's written like shit.
Sure they find new ways to make it look convincing but it never evolves. Suspended.
Rarely is the popular scenario having anything to do with the natural design of intimacy because Men and women are separated, disconnected because of a superficial distancing, an unnatural obstruction.
JUST LIKE they are IRL in modern culture, Macrophilia's birthplace, the cultural disconnect of men and women.
Macrophilia emulates exactly what created it. A system of hatred, confusion, abuse, and destabilization. Not between men and women, we have zero reason to fight, but the looming, domineering system that owns everything we see. Society, Big Brother, the actual Giant in question, orchestrates the disconnect.
Macrophilia emulates the disconnect. No different from a child emulating the traits of a parent, it's origin. Same exact principle.
Lastly, the most powerful propaganda-
are the impressions that you don't even realize exists, not the things you reject, but the things you actually like, the content you don't question, the media that gets past your defenses, the signals that plant seeds in you. That's where your guard needs to be up.
Which is why a child is ground zero for all kinds of potential damage and or potential, because children are too young to have too many/ if any defenses. It's why you teach & train them to develop that social immunity. Or don't, let society raise them and see how that turns out.
It's why a lot of people don't know where this manifestation comes from, some people will have had non-traumatic childhoods but still end up afflicted with Macrocreepisms cause they saw the wrong shit and something snapped.
Why? Because Parents aren't the only one's with access to a child's mind. It takes a village people,
Society is the village.
Society can take the form of an ad in a business magazine, gag comic, cartoon dream sequence in a show with a man on woman's fork, regardless of context, that vivid imagery where a man is helpless, that's a seed planted when the kid could be as young as maybe 4 or 10 or something.
The kid isn't going to know how to process that, and they won't know to go to the parent about it, so that uncertainty just sits there for a decade, and then they grow up (but not really, they just get older) and emulate & project what they saw 10-15 years ago and don't even remember it.
Or a movie where the topic is literal shrinkage, the child's confidence is already vulnerable and then seeing shrunken people at the mercy of bigger people in motion picture, this makes the kid identify with that size gap on epic scale, and boom, seed of corruption planted.
An ad, picture, a bully, a comment, an insult, a movie, you raising your voice at the child.
They come up in a society that clearly hates masculinity, men are bashed, husbands are made to look stupid, father's are trivialized. There are superhero movies where men are cool, but the dominant social climate takes men for granted and that's what matters.
Men & boys are either presented as irrelevant, stupid, weak, incompetent, expendable, dehumanized, small, beneath.
So that seed rots even more, so now the subject has an outlet to fall into deeper shenanigans: The Internet
I even saw a study years back that asserted that being male or the Y Chromosome was a "defect", the overtone being maleness is a defect. (Bullshit ofc, more misandrist propaganda, coming from a male author If I remember correctly, not surprising.)
Which to no one's surprise is actually a storyline in a Macrocreep comic, where men shrink at a certain age because of the Y chromosome being a defect.
You can't make this shit up. You just can't. And these gents & ladies are eating it up, internalizing this hatred coded into that crap. Just digesting poison.
Propaganda is not coincidence people. It emulates it's origin: Every. Single. Time. It's like DNA. And DNA at it's core is evidence of descendance.
This is why parents need to be proactive, you'll have no idea what your kids will see & hear at school, a friends house, how much they're carrying in their little hearts. And you'll have no fucking clue what that will do to them later.
You have to be proactive, preemptive, go beyond. Not smother them, but be invested, that same investment the day you bring em home, keep that same energy, don't get comfortable.
You have to build up the child's confidence now when they're malleable, build them up now, fortify them now.
Empowerment is actually meant for children, not grownass adults
Because if they get it as a child, they won't need it as an adult. That's the system; so the female empowerment campaign is a very covert op to cleverly infantilize women while feigning good intentions.
Keep them dependent on the system, dependent on external vindication and not their own inner strength as women. Sell them independence, while keeping them dependent on the collective to validate them.
Genius manipulation, a form of control.
So you empower the child so they don't remain small, weak, self-loathing, and vulnerable for the rest of their natural lives ironically as a turn-on or kink or whatever the rationalization is to justify it and avoid an actual solution which is:
📌letting it go.
Suspended, trapped in their own mind looking for mommy & daddy in wonderland because they either didn't truly have them in real life or what they had wasn't productive or stable. Even if the childhood wasn't entirely bad.
You can live in the same house as your parents and still not know them, or have a bond, or be close to them.
This shit is not a fucking game, parenting is not a spectator sport, children are not a new toy for your egos.
We need to stop having them to have them, and raise them to train them, to build stable, adjusted adults. #DISCIPLINE
Parents are the first actual giants in a child's life, children need to see you as a place of security NOW- so they're not chasing for security in god knows what way forever for the rest of their life, confused as fuck and all they get from society/ other people is enabling and cosigning which is the LAST thing people need.
You fail the child now, you fail them for life. Cause who should care more about them than you? They didn't ask to be here.
Take this parenting shit seriously, or don't do it at all.
Cause all you’re going to do is just create damaged cases broadcasting their insecurities for the rest of their natural lives because they need someone/anyone to pay attention
(aka they'll chase down what they should've already gotten from you); "Misery needs company."
Or you create something worse.
More so, criticism isn't persecution, it's an immune response to bullshit.
That's like asking a White blood cell count to mind their business while a stomach virus makes itself at home. Good luck with that.
It's part of being an adult, it's part of being member of a society, holding each other accountable.
People in power need to grow some balls. Starts with giving a shit about the issues, the big picture, not just what you read in a 12th edition study book. (No offense, much respect to the credentials)
The fact that people lost this balance, is why many of us are getting way too comfortable, too bold, yet so fragile, and cowardly.
Make it everyone's business, then panic when someone doesn't follow script and say all the things to make you feel good about one's mental issues. We are not entitled to praise, nor agreement, nor an echo chamber.
The Internet nor mankind was put here for your or anyone else's personal convenience. Living in the wrong timeline if you think you're entitled to cosigns bud, and so so so many I see are so spoiled by their cult safe spaces they talk as if they are when they're met with the slightest challenge and after I rap with them, their energy is completely diffused. And all it took was logic.
They only get bold to share this garbage on someplace like Youtube because they're counting on people saying nothing but cosign-nese.
And what's funny (not all) is a lot of fetishists will ignore the hundreds of people cosigning them but will give their attention to that one person that didn't:
That's the power of conviction of being held accountable. Corruption & insecurity instinctively hones in on it's natural enemy- accountability.
I just don't get how that's what you want to leave behind in the world when you're dead in a box, serious decline in the brain meats. You want to leave behind inhumanity, abuse, insecurity, misogyny, misandry, evil: Massacre's of your own species, no child is coming out of the womb twisted and broken like this, like a factory defect.
This is no defect, it's psychological sabotage, artificial damage.
This is a pure nurture/parenting/Cultural skill issue.
Parenting is not a joke people.
Apathy is the standard now. A generation of tolerance & unbridled weakness. By design, that's the point of tolerance.
Compassion, empathy are not the same as tolerance, tolerance is code for:
"Question nothing. Shut up. Mind your business."
We're all too used to being told exactly what we want to hear, not what we need to hear.
And it's not men & women's/little boys & girls fault/ hell it's not the fetishists fault their culture/ society (everyone as one entity) failed to teach them anything useful, how to be emotionally/socially functionally competent.
It's not their fault society failed them with a smile and now watching them burn & corrupt everything they touch.
Their parents failed to train them, not just RAISE, but TRAIN the child. You don't get psychological decline like this when the parents actually did their job.
The collective of the people, failed the people.
Cause something in a person is broken, bent, violated, and disfigured as a human being if genocide is a turn on (male or female). Your society, your parents, your culture failed you. And unfortunately it's on you to compensate for what they failed to do for you when you were small. Or don't and just consume, stay suspended, follow the script. Because that's definitely the easier path, but at what cost. It's not worth it.
The solution (partly on the level of a civilian): Accountability, criticism, inhibition, discipline, the basics of adulthood. All the things modern culture wants you to abandon for convenience, consumerism, conformity & indulgence. NPC.
All the things that'd raise/train more functional children thus more grounded adults, all the things most people see as a threat to their echo-chamber dogma.
Overarching cultural dysfunction breeding insecurity, corruption, internalized misery repurposed into sadism coded stockholm syndrome, decline, suspended development, and more dysfunction. As it tends to do.
Criticism is necessary. Accountability is not scary, it's part of growing the hell up.
