Showing posts with label michael knowles. Show all posts
Showing posts with label michael knowles. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 15, 2026

/re Jeremy Boreing Breaks Silence On Recent Drama | "Married men live longer" & the skill issue caveat




7:23 the married man life span thing is very real, it's part of the balance of the family unit that a woman's unique perspective fills in the gaps of an average man's tunnel-vision blind spots; however we really should be taking care of oneself, wife or no wife.

  • Cause if god forbid circumstances claim her life early, then what?
  • When time claims her, then what?
  • If she leaves, then what?
  • If she's a hot mess too that doesn't know how to eat proper also, then what?


Just the broad statistic of being married as a man means you'll 'likely' or 'tend to' live longer isn't an insurance policy, because at the end of the day: if you need a woman around just so you eat properly & sleep proper, that's a skill issue.

If you already do and she enhances that, that's different.

But a lot of people cite that fact of marriage with confident complacency, not realizing there's backhanded subtext attached to it.



Monday, November 24, 2025

LOL: Angry Feminist ATTACKS Trad Wives ('Dear Women' by modernity) Rigid norms are bad, unless they came from the “good guys”. ♀️



Nothing more feminist than degrading the life choices of other women because their contentment intimidates our feminist bubble.

Contrived attacks against other women cosplaying as feminist cultural analysis for the sake of ...women. Because you'd think those women being happy, safe, content, secure, cared for, & also providing for their home- you'd think that would be enough, right? 





Women can be whatever they want to be, except *THAT*, except happy, not that kind of happy, ew. 

You know what makes people happy? Another invented mansult, another article bringing people together in the comments--- to do what? Fight, attack, ideologically wrestle and hate each other. Thanks Academia!πŸ‘





That’s the modern norm, contention, misery and animosity that's healthy. decline is good. That’s the norm we chose for the modern woman & man, that rigid ritual is good!




How DARE women try to build something with a male, someone we decided is your labor, burden & enemy and whatever other thinktank vocabulary we’ll feed the empowerment ladies next year & the year after that.  



Degrading yourselves by being an essential, crucial  beating heart of the household, cultivating future members that will keep your civilization off of life support.


Remember, marriage  takes away your agency, and lessens your impact in society. It’s not like mothers are pivotal to civilization being allowed to continue existing or something. No, you're irrelevant when you put that shackle on your finger.

It’s not "entirely degrading", but c’mon you can do better. *scoff





Why do that, when you could be slaving out here instead, paid labor (*chuh ching), commute everyday, swallowed up in the machine, also unacknowledged (because you’re literally just another cog in the machine of the corporation,  epitome of expendable. The caveat is, both the housewife & office worker are part of something bigger than themselves, playing a part, thats the similarity. Otherwise---), and give us your time until your biological clock runs out.
 
So slaving away in a finite dimension is okay, UNLESS in it's in your home as a wife. 

Remote work for some corporate titan? That's acceptable, so slaving away in your home box is okay, unless it's as a housewife-- then it's a problem.


So what this is really about, apparently slaving away at home is great, as long as it's on progressive terms, so instead of patriarchy setting the ground rules, you have us instead! There’s a cubicle out there with your name on it.  We're on your side! πŸ‘ πŸ‘


Be the modern woman we told you to be or else you're degrading yourself.

"I'm Really Tired of All Men in Movies Being Failures, Actually" by JesterBell
22:55 --- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1v93ZbeDGk

 Have the right opinions or you're the enemy, that includes women.


Obey OUR rigid norms-

like we're the new patriarchy but we coded our rigidity as "autonomy" or "self-actualization" to make it sound like a moral imperative so that you essentially obey a new set of rigid standards but not the norms WE decided FOR WOMEN that's bad. 

Because your freedom of choice matters so much to us, sincerely *3rd wave modern feminism:






Obey our rigid sensibilities that increases loneliness epidemics & divides or else you're not woman enough.







Serious note**** Imagine it--- Calling someone’s life a fantasy, not some deranged fetish, but a legitimate life decision (civilization itself can benefit from, which negates then need to circumvent natural native population boost via illegal immigrants out of desperation because your women & men want nothing to do with each other because you made the sexes into war factions, good job!) is branded a "fantasy"- because you don't have their life or? 

Chuck Schumer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grwnbk6lxdo

Perhaps Women being happy in that "trad" formula contradicts what we were told to believe, I can just feel the sisterhood from here.  The support is overflowing:



And one of her strongest points in the video that Knowles doesn't address is the the life these tiktok/ trad wives online sell or promote is "fictitious" because it's only a polished highlight movie trailer into their lives, apparently it not being a 24 deep dive makes the entire thing fallacious.

But how is that any different from a woman working at twitter showing off a wine dispenser or the cafeteria, or a google employee showing off their workspace?

Is their career path then void & null because we didn't get the FULL SCOOP?

See the real issue is, women are leaving the plantation to go back to something they were told was the original plantation they were freed from.

Women submitting to the husband isn't slavery, it's respect. And don't forget that Feminisms original hard fought achievements applies to housewives too, so they have education opportunities (before they have children, to optimize their time resource), you're not in the 50s so men are in a much different place.

Even as far as the 50s were concerned, things aren't as rigid as people want you to believe. In a office, on a work site, on an oil rig, rigid simply means "normalcy" or "role". 


"Role-phobia", since feminists can just make up mansults that people somehow take seriously. 

I just made up Rolephobia, the irrational fear of structure & people having roles. Specifically gender roles, ooooOOOHhhhh, be afraid. 



 Even though to have a place in any job requires having a role. 🧠 But within a marriage, then it's a problem. 🧠🧠 but my oh my, all this loneliness, confusion, opting out, I have an idea, let's abolish more & more trad standards, and dismantle more and more norms & replace them with MY NORMS that I decided is better for everyone. I'm helping! I'm a good person.)





Women’s choice, her choice all the way until it complicates the “women must be disconnected, impressionable, miserable, & obedient to our norms only- so we can keep the gender war maintained” narrative going. 

Women are oppressed by patriarchy, but imposing self-worship, vanity, burnout culture, isolation & (for many as we're finding out) loneliness: That is a much better alternative.



Rigid norms are bad, unless it came from  the “good guys”. ♀️ Expectations of womanhood are up to women's choice, until we find out it isn't by the people who said it was women's "choice". ¯\_(ツ)_/¯





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e44jDgYU7BE&list=WL&index=76

Friday, October 24, 2025

EBT Freeloaders CRASH OUT After Getting Cut Off (minor excerpt of Michael Knowles on Birthrates)



5:45 nah, ppl have kids regardless of funds all the time. ppl don't breed, because people don't value families because society has destroyed the value of the family for more than 20 years.

can't just undo the damage of decades of propaganda in a few years because NOW you can't ignore the birthrates anymore. Thats not how it works & thats the only reason why people talk about it. You can’t pretend it doesn’t exist anymore.

  • The money is a factor for the smarter people who think first but the fact is: If the sexes don't want to deal with each other in the first place, yer not getting kids.
  • If the people together have more desires than values or principles, more wants than reciprocation? You're not getting families even if you get kids.

If 40-60% of people are opting out of dating, mankeeping, womankeeping, all these terms just to illustrate “frustrated”, if more men are retreating to fetishes, ai, addiction, online para-social crap like OF/Vtubers/Tier 3s, peter pan syndrome- anything and everything to replace women and men. And there's more and more puff piece articles ENCOURAGING IT? Enabling exploring this crap. 

You're not getting kids.

If the women are raised in feminized society that doesn't raise any men for them to choose from, and all they have are wannabe footslaves, boytoys, shrunken tinies, bottoms, and docile manchildren- a generation of weakness, self-loathing and incompetence.


you might get kids, MAYBE, but you're not getting stable families, let alone 40 yr + long marriages. It won't happen.


That time is long done, at best the flukes are the ones that do succeed. Success isn't the norm for westerners, because the norm is dysfunction, dysfunction is progressive.  Destigmatization is inclusive & tolerant.  Decline is the reward.

Japan has the exact same problem.

Why are any of us confused as to why birthrates decline in civilization that values dysfunction, hedonism, neutering masculinity because femininity is easier to control & manipulate, nerfing femininity by signaling to women that they have to emulate the masculine to compete with men instead of just changing how the competition works, & enabling disconnect more than pushing the family.


And you're actually surprised that your country got to this point? The real surprise is you didn't get here sooner.


This birthrate situation is not a complicated algorithm, and im so sick of the same 2-3 talking points being brought up as if that's all there is to it.

South Korea 2025 is somewhat fixing this issue by just changing the attitude of the overall culture AND providing monetary support, but it's more about the attitude of society.

And not just changing an outlook because it's a gut reaction to the numbers falling but a genuine admission that independence & Marxist abolition of the family for that ignorant sense of progression because your country THOUGHT you could afford to take traditional values for granted: was both a mistake and a lie.


Consequences.