Look up the "Perestroika" project from 1980s.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/C8YDTFjvV7U?feature=share
Socialism is so whack the Soviet Union tried to cultivate a more efficient model for it and still failed.
Socialism/Communism are an "Everybody wins" ideal, cause Capitalism made production look easy.
- Many people don’t like capitalism because it leaves people behind, the corporations. Exploitation. And they think equity is justice or the answer to that & the working class owning the property makes everyone a winner
thing is, idealism sounds great but it ages terribly.
The worst thing about Capitalism is without a doubt: Exploitation and will atrophy of constant production. But the benefit that is production, competition and thus advancement.
But it can atrophy, which is why mixed-economy adoption of some socialism can be beneficial (welfare, family support programs, etc.)
Otherwise It’s why Warfare is lucrative in it’s own ways, competition drives production.
- With a system of total equity, you stifle possibility, potential and what would happen because there’s inequality of circumstance. No one is motivated to push the boundaries because the outcome is guaranteed regardless of what you bring to the table.
- Not to be confused with inequality of Human Rights but inequality of production and ownership of property is the point here.
“So you’re not competent enough to compete so here’s a handicap because you’re that useless.” - The condescending attitude of Equity *coughcough* DEI
The complaints about Capitalism come from people mainly in Capitalist systems who need or want for nothing because the system they hate is why they don't go without.
Rarely do these people ever break off and go find out, try it for 4 or 10 years and tell us how great it is. They stay their asses right where they know they’ll keep their wealth.
Or these socialist streamers with expensive as fuck homes aka private owned property, because socialism; known for people owning their own property that others don’t have or have access to
Even tho Bidens team was scum for that border policy, there's a lesson in the mistake.
People weren't running from China to North Korea or other Socialism/Communist (same fucking thing) states, even tho they were closer in travelling distance than America.
There's a reason why they went to the Americans land.
People don't go to failed models (Socialism/Communism) for a fresh start, they don't move to another country with a socialist system they were already born in and already knows is garbage, they go to the system that works.
If Capitalism was that antiquated, people from socialist states wouldn't have been literally breaking national border laws just to get into capitalism.
The Capitalist nepo babies simp for socialism but never let go of the skirt of capitalism; yet the people born in socialism/communism don’t run to more socialism but instead run to Capitalism. Why are we pretending Socialism works when you won't go try it for yourself.
The punchline writes itself, and it’s not just nepo babies, people’s own language in the overarching media sphere with DEI programs and diversity efforts: “EQUITY” (Forced outcome, not earned)
Equality suddenly changed to Equity, mass gaslighting & now people think "that’s how it’s always been or?" They think it’s the same thing, the people running the flow of the zeitgeist ain’t slick, tryna change language to a more socialist leaning mindset.
There’s Socialist parasites in the upper echelon too that think the color RED (Socialism) is greener grass--- But I repeat, instead of these rats going to socialist states that already exist, they instead want to pervert & warp America into another
“Socialism works guys, we’ll get it right this time, promise!”
But meanwhile capitalism pays their bills, they own property out the whazoo, whole islands under their name (I certainly can't take my ass there when I want, because that property belongs to them, NOT US), & they manipulate the proletariate with various private owned companies, items, organizations, propagandas, inheritances closed off from the lower class (NOT SOCIALISM) and infrastructure they only possess because of personal owned elements---
Is that Socialism? Nope.
It’s CAPITALISM. Unless we accomplish making socialism look superior by using socialism, we’re making socialism & communism look weak. (cause it is)
Elites using a system that’s benefitting them to hype up another system that constantly fails. Proof being: Socialists thriving in capitalism while masturbating to socialism..
Capitalism ain’t perfect, it’s subject to exploitation of people & property and the have nots suffer. Some are lazy, most just start off at a bad beginning point than others, that’s literally life thus "economic factors" hence the allegedly need for equity.
The Lion & the hamster are not equals, but both have to make it work.
Someone is born in a poor home with a healthy body and will live to see 80. A wealthy child is born rich, but only has 20 years of life to live because of illness. Is it equitable? Nope, it’s reality. Have’s and have not’s.
There are things socialism just can’t control, which boils down to the issue with socialism: The illusion of control & fairness. And forcing an outcome for the have not, will not mean fairness for the one's ignored for the person who fit the right box. Someone will be a have not, no matter what you do.
When Capitalism does show more of it’s rusty bits beyond exploitation, it’s often when you try to force Socialist practices into it, which to no one’s surprise involves extreme left, woke ideologies that emphasize collective & equity over individual earns & efficient production.
Not perfect but efficient enough, because Capitalist production is not perfect.
There is no utopian formula to civilization, just the one’s that work and the one’s that don’t.
Equity over efficiency. Capitalism to Socialism to Communism isn't an evolution, it's age progression to inevitable death.
Socialism & Communism aren’t bad in concept, they work better in concept in fact, emphasizing welfare, public access to goods, nobody left out, working class has more control so workers are exploited less, everyone’s a winner and shit.....while the money’s hot anyway, and everything starts out good initially.
Thus it’s all rainbows when it’s early stages of infancy socialism. Thats what homegirl in the video testifies per North Korea.
Socialism works until you run out of money, until you get mileage, until you realize everybody winning tips the scale in one direction & someone is going to lose, or everyone will eventually. Equitable balance is an extremity, thus it’s not balanced.
Because stifling production to force equitable outcome stifles production, why work harder or innovate anything when the outcome is the same.
The aging process is where it gets messy for socialism.
When you really pay attention to what it is, thus what it is is an attempt to force a fair shake for everyone, and that’s impossible. But it’s out of good intentions.
But as with anything, forcing equity, or forcing anything with good intentions is not organic nor by proxy a good thing.
- Example. if Hannah provided a model for a company that boosted sales ten fold from then onwards for decades & she puts more into her work but lazy ass Derrick & Olivia gets paid the same as her anyway and they’re always late. That’s Equity. a forced, leveled outcome regardless of input.
Forcing leveled outcome is not fair to the people carrying their weight, equity & socialism are made from good intentions but burns everyone because it’s anything but fair when the point was fairness.
Because no matter what you do, you can’t make people capitalize on their own potential to push harder, and if you get an equitable means regardless of what you do, why give a shit to try at all?
Everyone is not a winner, no matter what you do. But with socialism, you guarantee everyone loses eventually. Ask the Soviet Union, ask the National Socialists of the 40s.
America & her interests (for the most part/& for now) are still here, they’re not.
And socialists occupying the states (who have made their presence known in various forms of media) will be the reason America ultimately falls, not because of capitalism, despite it’s faults.
Cause socialists like to plant socialism in a form of quasi-success/ prosperity that socialism didn’t cultivate in the first place then wonder why socialism fails.
“Equity” is a socialist element, so this shift from equality to equity is a red flag that said occupation in the States is accelerating shedding it’s subtlety.
And really, it’s okay. Every country doesn’t have to be capitalism, but It just kills me how these people & young wannabe Socialists (IN SPIRIT ONLY) or these upper echelon posers want to slither socialism in the zeitgeist but meanwhile they own islands, domestic land & various other investments nobody on the street has access to, completely private. Which spits in the face of what they claim to believe in.
The point of socialism & then communism is everyone sharing the same pot so everyone owns something, and has something the other possesses, common welfare. Community Commonwealth. That’s the point. The best thing about socialism/communism is: good intentions.
Can’t make this shit up. They themselves don’t even believe in their own bullshit but always have the word “capitalism” in their mouth while sucking on the tit of capitalism, that’s the part that gets me more than anything regarding actual socialism or communism as concepts, it’s the hypocrisy for me.
